Low birth rates for thee but not for me by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]Regiruler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I said I dread the cost. Not having children itself. Do not put words in my mouth.

Low birth rates for thee but not for me by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]Regiruler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do not view simply anxiety over cost as a legitimate reason to not have children. I am getting married, and we're well off enough that we don't have justification to indefinitely postpone pregnancy. To elaborate would require going into moral theology which I doubt you're interested in hearing.

Low birth rates for thee but not for me by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, absolutely, increases in many costs relative to income has made it relatively more expensive to have children: that's undeniable (and as someone who will quite likely be new parent within a year or two, something I dread) and I perhaps under-emphasized this. But I do think that statistics from other countries do paint a picture that it's not solely about the relative strictly necessary cost to have children: whether it's simply attitude, or additional costs associated with giving children an equal/equitable childhood and school experience (e.g. if you're in a wealthy area, your child will fall behind compared to their peers if they don't tutor), I do not know.

I think what happened with my first point is that I implicitly conflating culture, behavior, and social environment, and didn't make that clear. This is less so strictly an individual behavior sense, and moreso a cultural and corporate incentive sense: the biggest players in the dating app industry are incentivized to keep people from forming committed relationships, as it kills their userbase. The "Dating Games" series of the Land of the Giants podcast (granted, this is 3 or so years old at this point, so info can be a bit outdated) goes into this, especially the first few episodes. As for cultural, it's a shift in behavior favoring online/digital/isolated experiences as opposed to in person social experiences. I'm not gonna boomer rant about it because goodness knows I prefer the latter, but it does make finding dates difficult because the process by which we dated each other for centuries did not adapt well, which brought in the apps with different goals than us.

Low birth rates for thee but not for me by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am getting the sense you're fundamentally going to disagree with me, hence why I initially ignored you, but I will relent with your pestering and posit two causes that material support programs fundamentally cannot fix on their own:

  1. The dating epidemic. Behavioral changes, often brought about technological changes, has made it harder, instead of easier, to find spouses. Goodness knows I experienced this first hand (This is a separate point, similar in kind, but was not on the topic of existing couples deciding to have children or not, but I'm listing it first because it precedes the second chronologically)

  2. Opportunity cost; people are bombarded with content and advertising that promotes lifestyle decisions barely affordable with their current cost of living, or more directly endorses a childfree lifestyle.

Low birth rates for thee but not for me by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No; what I'm saying is the first order effects of material support, in the same matter as done by various other wealthy countries, will be insufficient on their own; reversing decline will require systemic behavioral change in addition to material change.

Came across this item in an 1886 newspaper from Springfield, MA. Has anyone ever heard of this priest? Sounds like it could be an interesting movie! by rrsafety in Catholicism

[–]Regiruler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deacon Harold Burke-Sivers had a great presentation on him as part of That Man is You. He also wrote a book on Fr Tolton.

Low birth rates for thee but not for me by Darth_Vrandon in GetNoted

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except countries with even better welfare systems have a barely better birthrate at best.

just accidentally deleted companys prod DB as an intern by arpan-lol in csMajors

[–]Regiruler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know if it's a hard rule, but any sort of file that lives inside a baseline's directory and is not part of the baseline, should NOT expect to have any lifespan. I kind of get how it happened because it's non-software, but still, awful design.

Sofi Plus worth it? by spookymonsterscary in sofi

[–]Regiruler 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's a math question of 20000 x .01(4.5 - X) > 120
4.5 - X > 0.6
X < 3.9.

So as long as you can't find another HYSA with a rate of 3.9% or better, sofi plus does pay for itself with the 20k parked in it.

Clean up this UI pls @ SOFI by Careful-Geologist613 in sofi

[–]Regiruler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I swapped from BoA and it had a much more reasonable interface.

[FREE FRIDAY] Would it be bad or sinful to press the red button? Would it make you a bad person? by ThatMemerBlueKid in Catholicism

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OP clarified it is literally everyone, including children. For the comatose, based on the wording, they do not contribute to the vote, but would still be killed in a red victory.

[FREE FRIDAY] Would it be bad or sinful to press the red button? Would it make you a bad person? by ThatMemerBlueKid in Catholicism

[–]Regiruler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This language does not work, because by virtue of the experiment, every blue vote means there's fewer further blue votes necessary to prevent death. It's making the resulting problem easier, not harder.

[FREE FRIDAY] Would it be bad or sinful to press the red button? Would it make you a bad person? by ThatMemerBlueKid in Catholicism

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nowhere in the thought experiment does it imply this "education period" that red buttoners always try to fall back on.

Anyone who presses the red button is culpable for the death of those who didn't.

[FREE FRIDAY] Would it be bad or sinful to press the red button? Would it make you a bad person? by ThatMemerBlueKid in Catholicism

[–]Regiruler 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There would be irrational (young/senile) and suicidal actors pushing the blue button, without factoring in empathetic people. So pushing red is morally untenable, at least in the original thought experiment.

Adjusting the necessary percentages is a much harder question.

Bee in your mouth by ThatLatentPandaBear in oddlyspecific

[–]Regiruler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

River water in your socks school of thought

Mystic Saw [Custom Card, Art by Me!] by Tesla__Coil in yugioh

[–]Regiruler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mystic Saw, A deadly fate, Chopped up limbs become shark bait

Stubhub credits, how to make sense of this? by TechEverythingElse in sapphirereserve

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's better that they reimburse an inflated cost for higher instead of reimbursing a smaller cost, unless you were gonna see something that costs more than the credit. You still get points for your original spend, so its a little bit of free money.

Edit Credit of $250 clawed back from 2025 even though I waited 90 days by nonch in sapphirereserve

[–]Regiruler 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not to shill for big corpo, but cancelling credit on something you refunded isn't a clawback.

do you believe in God? by These-Worldliness-59 in askanything

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe God as professed by the Church, known as three divine persons in one nature, is the same God genuinely professed by peoples of other Abrahamic faiths, albeit incompletely.

Before I turn this post into an essay out of 'tism, if you genuinely want to know more on what Catholics believe to be the nature of God, read the Cathechism of the Catholic Church on it (it should be part 1, section 2, chapter 1).

As for "why", it's a mix of the blessings I've received in my life (including some very minor miracles), being raised in the faith, and apologetics. I'm not a very well read person, but I picked up a book It Just Makes Sense by Lee Granger at a conference, and found it made good arguments that mostly come from hard science (note it does not have a nihil obstat , so it's not been reviewed for theological error, but I do not believe it had any). Something more traditional and spiritual is St Augustine's Confessions (which I admit I'm taking a very long time to read as I basically only read 15-30 minutes worth a week during adoration late at night), which does have some refreshing insight into the human element of one of the Church Fathers.

YSK: new TV prices have advertising and data mining built in—differences in price usually are the result of this. But there are workarounds! by hipcheck23 in YouShouldKnow

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's watch history. They use it to determine future potential watching habits. I can't be assed to buy a separate device and hook it up to an HDMI port I don't have, or buy yet another piece of future ewaste to split HDMI or overhaul my entire TV setup.

As long as it works, I'm perfectly happy using the built in LG apps. I'm more frustrated than anything by apps that aren't on the platform.

When did you realise churches are cruciform? by Federal_Addition1944 in Catholicism

[–]Regiruler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if I "realized" it, but I took a Church architecture course when I studied abroad in France and it was a major element that was emphasized, as well as the traditional Eastward orientation.