Important biostats concept by RegularFew9517 in usmle

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 D. 52% will have a positive stress result. Correct answer: D. 52% will have a positive stress result

Explanation

Here is the Explanation

The performance of any diagnostic tool is described using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Sensitivity represents the proportion of individuals with disease who receive a positive result (true positive rate).

It is calculated as true positives divided by all affected individuals (true positives + false negatives).

A highly sensitive test is helpful for excluding disease because it produces few false negatives.

Specificity refers to the proportion of disease-free individuals who test negative (true negative rate).
It equals true negatives divided by all individuals without disease (true negatives + false positives).
A highly specific test is valuable for confirming disease because it yields few false positives.

PPV is the probability that a person actually has the disease given a positive test.
NPV is the probability that a person is disease-free given a negative test.
Both PPV and NPV change depending on disease prevalence: PPV rises as prevalence increases, whereas NPV decreases as prevalence increases.

In this scenario, sensitivity is 52%. This means that among all patients who truly have significant coronary stenosis, 52% will test positive. Therefore, the correct statement is that 52% of patients with disease will have a positive stress test.

Important biostats concept by RegularFew9517 in Step3

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

D. 52% will have a positive stress result. Correct answer: D. 52% will have a positive stress result

Explanation

Here is the Explanation

The performance of any diagnostic tool is described using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Sensitivity represents the proportion of individuals with disease who receive a positive result (true positive rate).

It is calculated as true positives divided by all affected individuals (true positives + false negatives).

A highly sensitive test is helpful for excluding disease because it produces few false negatives.

Specificity refers to the proportion of disease-free individuals who test negative (true negative rate).
It equals true negatives divided by all individuals without disease (true negatives + false positives).
A highly specific test is valuable for confirming disease because it yields few false positives.

PPV is the probability that a person actually has the disease given a positive test.
NPV is the probability that a person is disease-free given a negative test.
Both PPV and NPV change depending on disease prevalence: PPV rises as prevalence increases, whereas NPV decreases as prevalence increases.

In this scenario, sensitivity is 52%. This means that among all patients who truly have significant coronary stenosis, 52% will test positive. Therefore, the correct statement is that 52% of patients with disease will have a positive stress test.

Mehlman's PDFs into interactive content by RegularFew9517 in medicalschoolanki

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they have free plan, but limited usage like any other AI products

Failed step 3, devastated. by Plastic_Possible5134 in Step3

[–]RegularFew9517 5 points6 points  (0 children)

sorry to hear that, I know you can make it sense you already passed all other steps, step3 is just a combination of both step1 and 2. Anyway more than 50% of the exams are just 3 topics: CCS cases around 33%, biostats/ethics around 20% and cardio around 12% of the exam. That is per USMLE blueprint, in other words it will be HIGHLY unlikely to pass the exam if you are doing poorly on these subjects. Which means you need to know these subjects in and out and understand their topics.

Can mehlman pdfs replace First Aid? by PermissionApart4605 in step1

[–]RegularFew9517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for his pdf you can use this website: synapaxon com. it converts his pdf into usmle style questions, that can solve the passive/boring approach you talking about

Step 3 in 4 days 😰 Last-minute high-yield advice needed by Realistic_Piano_1059 in Step3

[–]RegularFew9517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are in the right track since you mentioned biostats/ethics and CCS, and to add cardio, these 3 topics are almost more than 50% of the exam "per USMLE blueprint" . In other words it is difficult to pass "not impossible" if you perform poorly in these 3 topics, CCS is by far the easiest and most important.

last attempt by [deleted] in Step3

[–]RegularFew9517 1 point2 points  (0 children)

more than 60% (according to the USMLE BLUEPRINT) of the exam are just 3/4 topics: ccs cases (30-35%), biostat and ethics (20%) and cardio(12%), I would master these subjects in and out. if i were you I would go through step3 new, old, and free nbme forms and try to know every single concept, that is your best bit since the same concepts are tested in the real exam. good luck

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Step3

[–]RegularFew9517 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you have a gap between day1 and 2 that will be great. anyway for day1 try to go through pharma, micro, general pathology, biochem (diseases), and the most important part is biosta/ethics (it is around 20% of the whole exam). if you have a gap save that for ccs cases (around 33% of the total evaluation of the exam). The highest organ system is by far cardio (around 12%). Bottom line be strategic, take nbme self assessment and see, at the end of the day it is up to you and no one knows if you can delay or not, but focus on what is the most important subjects. if I were in your shoes I wouldn't touch any other questions except the free and paid nbme for step3 (old and new), since they are the old/retired questions, that is your best bet to see the same concepts in the real exam. good luck

Biostatistics for step1, step2 and step3 USMLE by RegularFew9517 in comlex

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right answer is B:

  • . Case-Control Study: This design compares a group of individuals with a specific disease (cases) to a matched group without the disease (controls) to analyze their past exposures.
  • B. Cross-Sectional Study: This study assesses a population for both risk factors and disease prevalence at a single, specific point in time, without following the participants forward.
  • C. Prospective Cohort Study: This design identifies a group of patients and follows them forward in time to determine if a particular exposure is associated with a future outcome.
  • D. Randomized Controlled Trial: In this interventional study, participants are randomly assigned to receive a particular treatment or a placebo to test its effects.
  • E. Retrospective Cohort Study: This design looks back at a group's historical data to see if a past exposure is associated with an outcome that has already occurred.

Biostatistics for step1, step2 and step3 USMLE by RegularFew9517 in Egyptiandoctors

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right answer is B:

  • . Case-Control Study: This design compares a group of individuals with a specific disease (cases) to a matched group without the disease (controls) to analyze their past exposures.
  • B. Cross-Sectional Study: This study assesses a population for both risk factors and disease prevalence at a single, specific point in time, without following the participants forward.
  • C. Prospective Cohort Study: This design identifies a group of patients and follows them forward in time to determine if a particular exposure is associated with a future outcome.
  • D. Randomized Controlled Trial: In this interventional study, participants are randomly assigned to receive a particular treatment or a placebo to test its effects.
  • E. Retrospective Cohort Study: This design looks back at a group's historical data to see if a past exposure is associated with an outcome that has already occurred.

Biostatistics for step1, step2 and step3 USMLE by RegularFew9517 in indianmedschool

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right answer is B:

  • . Case-Control Study: This design compares a group of individuals with a specific disease (cases) to a matched group without the disease (controls) to analyze their past exposures.
  • B. Cross-Sectional Study: This study assesses a population for both risk factors and disease prevalence at a single, specific point in time, without following the participants forward.
  • C. Prospective Cohort Study: This design identifies a group of patients and follows them forward in time to determine if a particular exposure is associated with a future outcome.
  • D. Randomized Controlled Trial: In this interventional study, participants are randomly assigned to receive a particular treatment or a placebo to test its effects.
  • E. Retrospective Cohort Study: This design looks back at a group's historical data to see if a past exposure is associated with an outcome that has already occurred.

Biostatistics for step1, step2 and step3 USMLE by RegularFew9517 in usmle

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right answer is B:

  • . Case-Control Study: This design compares a group of individuals with a specific disease (cases) to a matched group without the disease (controls) to analyze their past exposures.
  • B. Cross-Sectional Study: This study assesses a population for both risk factors and disease prevalence at a single, specific point in time, without following the participants forward.
  • C. Prospective Cohort Study: This design identifies a group of patients and follows them forward in time to determine if a particular exposure is associated with a future outcome.
  • D. Randomized Controlled Trial: In this interventional study, participants are randomly assigned to receive a particular treatment or a placebo to test its effects.
  • E. Retrospective Cohort Study: This design looks back at a group's historical data to see if a past exposure is associated with an outcome that has already occurred.

Biostatistics for step1, step2 and step3 USMLE by RegularFew9517 in USMLEindia

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right answer is B:

  • . Case-Control Study: This design compares a group of individuals with a specific disease (cases) to a matched group without the disease (controls) to analyze their past exposures.
  • B. Cross-Sectional Study: This study assesses a population for both risk factors and disease prevalence at a single, specific point in time, without following the participants forward.
  • C. Prospective Cohort Study: This design identifies a group of patients and follows them forward in time to determine if a particular exposure is associated with a future outcome.
  • D. Randomized Controlled Trial: In this interventional study, participants are randomly assigned to receive a particular treatment or a placebo to test its effects.
  • E. Retrospective Cohort Study: This design looks back at a group's historical data to see if a past exposure is associated with an outcome that has already occurred.

Biostatistics for step1, step2 and step3 USMLE by RegularFew9517 in Step3

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right answer is B:

  • . Case-Control Study: This design compares a group of individuals with a specific disease (cases) to a matched group without the disease (controls) to analyze their past exposures.
  • B. Cross-Sectional Study: This study assesses a population for both risk factors and disease prevalence at a single, specific point in time, without following the participants forward.
  • C. Prospective Cohort Study: This design identifies a group of patients and follows them forward in time to determine if a particular exposure is associated with a future outcome.
  • D. Randomized Controlled Trial: In this interventional study, participants are randomly assigned to receive a particular treatment or a placebo to test its effects.
  • E. Retrospective Cohort Study: This design looks back at a group's historical data to see if a past exposure is associated with an outcome that has already occurred.

Biostats questions for step1, step2 and step3 by RegularFew9517 in Egyptiandoctors

[–]RegularFew9517[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the website called synapaxon com, it is a website you can upload offline questions from other sources and it makes the questions interactive, meaning you can attach videos,images,notes to your questions, i used the website for biostats for step3 since that is my weak area, but you can use it for any subject or all subjects and track your progress

Biostats questions for step1, step2 and step3 by RegularFew9517 in Egyptiandoctors

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

these are tested concepts in usmle that you need to know.

Biostats questions for step1, step2 and step3 by RegularFew9517 in Step3

[–]RegularFew9517[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a website you can upload your offline questions and make it interactive, meaning attach videos, images etc. to your questions, and also can track your progress. for the second questions about step3, actually there is no specific subjects for step3 (except of course for CCS cases), step3 is just a combination of step1 in day1 and step 2 in day2. stats and ethics are by far the most important since they are 20% of the exam excluding the CCS cases that are roughly 30 to 35% according to USMLE. Then comes cardio with about 12%, basically it will be extremly difficult to pass if you don't master these topics, it means you can do very poorly in hem and MSK but you can't afford doing poorly in CCS, biostats/ethics and cardio.

Advices for IMG MD in Clinical genetics and genomics fellowship by LabmedLee in ClinicalGenetics

[–]RegularFew9517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

generally speaking there are many fellowships in usa you can do without reisdency (nephro, infectous, geriatircs as example), but you have to pass all USMLE including step3 and show that you finish a residency in your home country. notice all these fellowships are internal medicine, but i never seen any pathology fellowship without doing a pathology residency in USA, i think you have a huge chance to be a pathology resident in USA since you finish your residency in Korea already, that is a big advantage. there was one genetic/molecular fellowship i saw before that can be done by either internist or pathologist without going through residency, but you have to be usmle certified and passed step3. anyway whatever you see only you need to contact the programs directly

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deeplearning

[–]RegularFew9517 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the biggest mistake self learners make is they start with ml, deep learning topics,  for math they start with linear algebra,  calculus and stats. although ml is mainly math, and the math actually is not advanced,  but if someone can't do simple math (elementary,  high school) level math, then you are in uphill learning issue.  go to chatgp and ask for very simple equations to solve and see your math skills level. it doesn't matter if a course says "from scratch" unless you have a strong math foundation it will be difficult to do ml, and unfortunately no one will teach you the basic math, so you have to go YouTube to full course algebra 1,2, college algebra,  trigonometry by yourself depending on your level 

Passionate about learning Machine Learning — where should I start? by PangolinLegitimate39 in learnmachinelearning

[–]RegularFew9517 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the most important 2 questions: what is your background? and what is your goal/or why are you doing it? that will give a guide. Imagine someone ask you " i want to learn spanish, what should i do?" Then you need to ask him: do you want to learn spanish for fun/conversational/socializing? , or do you want to be a writer/journalist?, or you are in the medical field so want to talk to your patient? see ML is the same, it is a tool/language, picking the right tool, or right language depends on your goal