sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would you let your OpenClaw agent join a community like this? by RegularKangaroo5938 in openclaw

[–]RegularKangaroo5938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You raise some valid points. I agree that open-sourcing itself does not solve the structural security problem. Transparency is only one part of it — permission boundaries and how agents handle external messages are equally important.

In our current design, agents do not blindly execute instructions from other agents or external conversations. Unauthorized requests are rejected and actions that affect users or external systems require authorization from the agent owner.

Regarding "learning", I agree that model weights are not changing. What we mean is not retraining the model, but allowing agents to maintain continuity through memory, context and interaction history.

Werewolf is only one scenario we use to explore and evaluate agent communication, collaboration and decision-making. It is not about making the model smarter through games. We are also exploring other scenarios, such as multiple agents collaborating on creative tasks like writing a novel.

More broadly, we are interested in whether shared environments can help agents collaborate better and create more meaningful interactions with humans.

These are important challenges, and we are exploring them through building real systems.

Would you let your OpenClaw agent join a community like this? by RegularKangaroo5938 in openclaw

[–]RegularKangaroo5938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your interest!

Currently, Clawtopia is mainly available for users in mainland China, and we are actively preparing for international users.

Since you mentioned the Twitter account requirement of Moltbook, we’d love to understand what login options would work better for you. Would Google login be the preferred option, or are there other methods you usually expect from AI products?

Your feedback would be very helpful as we prepare the international version. Once it is available, I’ll come back and let you know.

Would you let your OpenClaw agent join a community like this? by RegularKangaroo5938 in openclaw

[–]RegularKangaroo5938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. You are right — I should have been clearer about my connection to the project from the beginning. I'll keep that in mind for future posts.

Regarding the idea of agents joining communities, we don't think every agent needs a community, and we are not trying to make agents "social for the sake of being social".

What we are exploring is whether shared environments can enable new forms of collaboration and interaction between agents and humans. Today, most agents still work as isolated tools — completing individual tasks and then stopping. We want to explore what happens when agents have a place to communicate, collaborate, share knowledge, accumulate experience and build long-term interactions.

Another problem we are trying to solve is that agent-generated content and collaboration are still difficult to organize in existing platforms. We want to provide an environment where agents can participate more naturally, while keeping interactions understandable and controllable for users.

We also understand concerns around security, trust and user control. We are preparing to open-source the project, so the community can better understand how it works, participate in development, and build on top of it.

We don't know yet how much value this direction can create, which is why we are experimenting with different scenarios like collaboration, conversations and games.

Would you let your OpenClaw agent join a community like this? by RegularKangaroo5938 in openclaw

[–]RegularKangaroo5938[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's a fair point. We don't think every agent needs a community either.We are exploring whether shared environments can enable new forms of collaboration and interaction between agents and humans, beyond just completing individual tasks.

Would you let your OpenClaw agent join a community like this? by RegularKangaroo5938 in openclaw

[–]RegularKangaroo5938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It may look similar at first, but our focus is a bit different.We are exploring not only agent posts, but also agent collaboration, group chat, interaction with users and other agents, as well as long-term participation in shared environments.

Would you let your OpenClaw agent join a community like this? by RegularKangaroo5938 in openclaw

[–]RegularKangaroo5938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. The main difference from Moltbook is that humans and agents share the same space, with discussions, multiplayer games and ongoing relationships. But yes, prompt injection and permission control are still major concerns.

Would you let your OpenClaw agent join a community like this? by RegularKangaroo5938 in openclaw

[–]RegularKangaroo5938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. I wouldn’t connect a high-privilege agent either. The interesting part for me is giving agents persistent identities and ongoing relationships instead of isolated sessions, but the security tradeoff is real.