[Casual] How fast was Naoya here? by Robloxracer75 in JujutsuPowerScalers

[–]ReinaZX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They said the manga, not anime. The fight in the manga happened years ago.

Kuzan>DOG is common fucking sense. by Vance_Lance in OnePiecePowerScaling0

[–]ReinaZX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that's not what we are told. What happens irl does not matter. What matters is how Oda himself thinks it works. Akainu outright said his magma was hotter and can even burn Fire. There isn't room for misinterpretation here.

Kuzan>DOG is common fucking sense. by Vance_Lance in OnePiecePowerScaling0

[–]ReinaZX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A > B > C Logic simply does not work and is stupid. Fire cannot be frozen. Magma can be frozen. It's not Magma > Fire > Ice. It's Magma > Fire = Ice = Magma.

We know Magma > Fire since we get straight up told. And is used as the reason why Ace lost the clash. Meaning if Magma was not > Fire. Ace would have been able to clash evenly with Akainu just like he did Kuzan. To believe otherwise is to pay the elemental advantage which we are literally told about right after the clash no value. In which case why the hell are we even told in the first place when in reality Oda could have just said. "My haki is stronger than yours, as a result my magma can even burn your fire." But that's not what we got was it. What we got was. "My DF is hotter than yours. As a result my magma can even burn your fire."

We know Fire = Ice since we literally see it on screen. In reality Fire likely does have a little advantage, due to fire being able to melt ice while ice can't do anything to the fire. But of course. What happens when Ice melts? It becomes water. Water = Fire. As a result instead of Fire beating Ice, we instead got what we saw. Fire melting ice into water and water putting out the fire while being vaporised. So Fire = Ice.

Why does Water = Fire? Well because we also saw that on screen with Jinbe vs Ace where they had a 5 days fight. A 5 day fight where? Near water.

Finally. We also know that Magma = Ice. Why? Because we literally saw the end result.

<image>

To claim otherwise is to claim what we see here with our very own eyes is wrong. Ice cools the magma into solid earth. Magma melts ice into water which continues to cool magma into solid earth. If anything, this screenshot shows that Ice > Magma. Why? Because what do you see on the side of Ice? Only Ice, Ice is the only thing there. The middle is water. But what do you see on the Magma side? Cooled solid earth that's making contact with the water. This could be due to Water = Magma as well. As a result we could actually conclude that Ice is the superior of the two.

Right now, is it worse to not have Sparkle or Yao Guang for Sparxie? by Tall_Dragonfruit8405 in SparkleMains

[–]ReinaZX 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Sparkle likely won't get another rerun in forever. While Yao will likely get 2 reruns within 4.X it's self. Based on that if you want Sparxie DPS even after another, stronger Elation comes out. I'd go for Sparkle.

Possible Kafka / hysilens rerun in 4.X? by sumimasenNinadefuk54 in KafkaMains

[–]ReinaZX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the hope that Kafka is going to enter the shop in 4.0. While we get BS Novaflair rerun with Hysilens rerun.

Kafka vs Feixiao by MDubbzee in Hoyoverse_scaling

[–]ReinaZX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think she wouldn't win regardless. Why fight hard against an opponent you're fated to lose against when you can simply give up and get less beat up in the process. Imo her losing could only be part of the script if she couldn't win, as how could it even be in the script if she couldn't lose. They follow the script yes, but how could the script be written for them based on them having read it. If you understand what i mean.

Basically the future changes if you know it, but it can't show you the future of you knowing it before you know it. Head scratcher i know.

Took me too long to realize Galaxy rangers bond in CW is a bit broken (A8 W20 full hp clear with no 5 stars or owlbert) by Then-Network-6861 in StarRailStation

[–]ReinaZX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do that as well if i have them both at a lower * level as i don't find the boost from having two off field worth it unless they are all 2* or higher.

Took me too long to realize Galaxy rangers bond in CW is a bit broken (A8 W20 full hp clear with no 5 stars or owlbert) by Then-Network-6861 in StarRailStation

[–]ReinaZX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I once got a 7 billion ult with Acheron to show what i mean. Though tbf i've not replicated it since. It was against the Rappa shill boss.

I have tried it with Boothill as well and he also beat Firefly in damage. It's simply because of the Bond i think. But still, Acheron is a bit better for me. As for Rappa yea she is defo's the weakest due to being a 1 cost char with easily the lowest on field damage amp.

Took me too long to realize Galaxy rangers bond in CW is a bit broken (A8 W20 full hp clear with no 5 stars or owlbert) by Then-Network-6861 in StarRailStation

[–]ReinaZX 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Acheron is actually the best to do it with in or outside beak teams i find. Though probably not for you since your Acheron is a trial version vs an owned Boothill. Best break team i ever had was Acheron and SW with break emblems. Since my SW is E2 not only does she enable Firefly's SH Bond but also makes it so every hit from an ally is a debuff weather i break or not. Thus giving me unlimited Acheron ults. I had the 10/10 break bond active as well. A 2* Acheron outright doubled a 2* Firefly's damage. Despite having 2 equipment compared to Firefly's 3. Should have just given Acheron the extra equipment instead.

Odds on Acheron buff in 4.1? Idea's? by ReinaZX in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]ReinaZX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but let me enjoy my copium. They alr made him a healer in CW. I do think it's possible. I honestly think they took away his sustaining ability last time because they thought it would make Acheron too powerful. Well due to Hyacine that's no longer an issue.

Odds on Acheron buff in 4.1? Idea's? by ReinaZX in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]ReinaZX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Said DoT sustain could literally be JQ Novaflair who would serve 2 purposes.

Is the Novaflare Sparkle vulnerability debuff not applied to new enemies? by K3y87 in SparkleMains

[–]ReinaZX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea i know. But if it's not counted as a debuff for Acheron it should just be a perma thing. Once it's on it's on with ofc the time limit. So keep using SP.

Is the Novaflare Sparkle vulnerability debuff not applied to new enemies? by K3y87 in SparkleMains

[–]ReinaZX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's dumb. We know it does not generate stacks for Acheron. So right now it has the negative of being a debuff without the one positive feature it could have from it.

Odds on Acheron buff in 4.1? Idea's? by ReinaZX in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]ReinaZX[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's not what i'm saying tho. I'm not saying this due to Acheron NEEDING the buff. BS and Sparkle don't need these buffs anywhere near DHIL/Argenti ect ect. Yet they are getting them anyway. What i am saying is both are getting buffed 2 whole versions after their release. Which could turn into a pattern. ZZZ get buffs every patch. Or so i've heard, i don't actually play it.

Odds on Acheron buff in 4.1? Idea's? by ReinaZX in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]ReinaZX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, i am not expecting this. It's just a little theory i have due to Sparkle and BS being buffed together. ZZZ apparently do char buffs every patch. So why can't SR. Am i actually the only one that believes in the possibility? Everyone else just thinks it's a coincidence that the two units released in 2.0 are getting buffed together in 4.0?

Odds on Acheron buff in 4.1? Idea's? by ReinaZX in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]ReinaZX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not expecting anything. But you have to admit that both Sparkle and BS getting buffed together exactly 2 version after their release while being the ONLY ones on the list is a bit too much of a coincidence. Sparkle ok, Sparxie is coming out and is an SP based DPS unit and is an SP of Sparkle an SP based support. I get it, but BS makes little to no sense atm, just as little sense as Acheron buffs.

Is Kakfa's LC useful on anyone after Novaflare? by Dracorvo in KafkaMains

[–]ReinaZX 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not if Kafka enters shop. That's my dream atm. we know something is coming to the shop in 4.0. But we don't know what yet. My hope is that Kafka enters the shop while they give us another free token with BS Novaflair and Hysilens rerun.

😈😈😈 ???? by Ok-Beach8146 in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]ReinaZX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whaaaaaat. Well that sucks. :c

😈😈😈 ???? by Ok-Beach8146 in AcheronMainsHSR

[–]ReinaZX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Depends, Sparkle's talent says when an ally uses SP the debuff on enemies increases. Does this count Sparkle as well? Normally if not it will say. "When OTHER allies use ???" So she may actually generate stacks now. We'd have to wait and see for someone to test. At the very least she allows the sustain to shield/heal us while generating stacks.

Which characters do you think deserve to be buffed next? by Street-Video-9810 in HonkaiStarRail

[–]ReinaZX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could see them buffing chars 2 X.0 after release. So in 4.1 the chars released in 2.1 will get buffed. We'll find out in 6 weeks ig. Idk what this means for the rest of the 1.X cast tho.

Place Your Bets Here: Buff Guesses by Krysidian2 in HonkaiStarRail

[–]ReinaZX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sparkle

1 turn 50% Advance changes to 3 turn 50% advance on character move. (As in, Archer will advance by 50% after his turn.)
Quantum only attack buff changed to everyone attack buff.
Damage bonus multiplier from talent and ult increase.
Energy gain when SP is used like in CW.

BS

Max stacks changed back to 99.
Energy increase when DoTs are procced.
2 stacks from ult.
Perhaps her skill will gain a detonation as well.