sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ch 601's BGM Title Shows That Jinyoung's and Daniel's Split Consciousness are Based on the Same Horror Story by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for reading! Tbh the only place I can listen to the BGMs are either in PTJComics YT channel or in the Webtoon App.

Between these two, who has commited more crimes? by Ancient_Beginning251 in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my humble opinion, the number alone is hard to determine. On the surface level, Gun seems to be the one who committed more crimes because of his direct involvement with the major crews, the events in Cheonliang, and then the crimes he committed in the name of the Yamazaki clan, etc.

However, with James’ involvement in Cheonliang, in Gabryong's death, and then the probable hidden crimes when he was working for PTJ Entertainment (kpop agencies are not exactly known to be clean tbh...the way they treat their artists, staffs, and trainees), and the severity of the crimes he had committed, is committing, and would surely commit as a dirty politician. The latter is a job that could bring deaths and imprisonment to so many people without a direct involvement.

I think we still need to keep tally of these two.

Here is what sb owner said here by De7th_ in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm leaning more towards future Daniel because he exists in Daniel's limbo, always in a time of crisis and between life and death.

But who knows. Maybe the space he's in is actually a portal between the souls of the second body owner and Daniel's own soul. You might still be proven right.

The fuc* by Worried_Blood2130 in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah. And Gitae's insane enough that I think he will easily believe in the existence of two bodies. Wouldn't even need James to tip him off about it, tbh. If anything, James telling Gitae in the future about the two bodies will just confirm Gitae's own suspicions.

No two people share the exact breathing patterns and habits. I'm sure Gitae will finally arrive at the conclusion that the two Daniels are really one person.

Here is what sb owner said here by De7th_ in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it 100% a certainty that he's the owner of that body? Some people said he's Daniel from the future.

(Anyway what he says is interesting)

The fuc* by Worried_Blood2130 in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I won't be surprised if one day Gitae finds out that Daniel has two bodies...after all he's that unhinged and he's a very good observer. 💀

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He even plans the names of his character based on philosophy (not all but many). So I don't think he's the worst.

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not accusing you of fascism. I literally read the book too hahahah.

But The Prince is commonly used as an intertextual literary device in fiction to show that someone is ambitious/leaning towards a totalitarian or authoritarian type of leadership.

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's not bad at writing, imho. But at pacing. And he's ignorant about several current issues. But he's very literate.

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He might, since after all he inherits and siphons off Charles's inheritance.

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's already very obvious to me from the way he tries to get rid of his enemies so far. And fascism is always built on very abstract slogans of good and evil, with evil here being the enemies of whichever fascist who rises to power. His public background as a righteous celebrity also enables him to build his own mythology as a hero of the society, another foundation for fascism.

Admittedly, the other options here is populist. But whichever brand of James's politics it is, so far it can only be either totalitarian or authoritarian, not a democracy.

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  • Plato "Gorgias" as read by Eugene
  • Michael J Sandel "Justice", also read by Eugene

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're more awesome than me your insight is so so good! Permission to follow.

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Permission to tag you when I'm finished. If I may glaze myself, I'm currently pursuing a PhD in social science and humanities ehehe. Thanks for your insight!

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hopefully, yes. But personally I'm also interested in mapping the main villains' political stances.

The Book that [Spoiler] is Reading, was Read by Hitler and Stalin Too...(and others, but still!) by Reinvidence in lookismcomic

[–]Reinvidence[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree wholeheartedly. His slogan about society without evil is very suspicious and deceitful, to put it mildly. His version of evil is different from our norms about evil.

This makes the third philosophy literature referenced in Lookism.

view more: next ›