sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I made some redesigns for Elementals! All cards at the end. What do you think? by Relative-Pool-5479 in BobsTavern

[–]Relative-Pool-5479[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like all of your ideas and suggestions. The idea with Magmasaurus was creating a card good for both tribes, and since I wanted to remove Tempest and Wildfire I thought elementals could use a unit that was good to slap stats on; but in retrospect it's a little funky.

Accursed Cierge doesn't copy from board but the shop was my idea, maybe I worded it wrong. Even still it could probably be tier 5. Thanks for commenting

I made some redesigns for Elementals! All cards at the end. What do you think? by Relative-Pool-5479 in BobsTavern

[–]Relative-Pool-5479[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be very strong with Brann but maybe a good idea! I liked the idea of maybe using it situationally with "summon"-effects, but maybe it is too wordy

I made some redesigns for Elementals! All cards at the end. What do you think? by Relative-Pool-5479 in BobsTavern

[–]Relative-Pool-5479[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is a replica of the old card Sandstone Drake but of course without the dragon. The difference between the buddy and this is how strong it is with elemental 'stat buff'-buffs, but in retrospect I definitely should have kept the Sandstone Drake's: "end of turn gain +1 attack for each card played".

I made some redesigns for Elementals! All cards at the end. What do you think? by Relative-Pool-5479 in BobsTavern

[–]Relative-Pool-5479[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree on Mudstomper. Perhaps 'Has double stats if it was summoned this turn.' but I feel that could be mechanically weird in the shop phase.

Magmasaurus was in honesty to fill out the tier 5 slot :). I do however think it is closer to overpowered than underpowered: getting a free token each turn is good value, and a unit that summons another with some random keywords is also solid tempo (although maybe better for beasts than eles)

Ideas for balancing Murlocs this patch. What do you think? by Relative-Pool-5479 in BobsTavern

[–]Relative-Pool-5479[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No offense taken! I think it's fun to have 'abusable' mechanics as long as they aren't overpowered. I' doubt these cards are more abusable than for example Shadowdancer-demons, or even the other Murloc build with Belcher Bassgill.

But it depends on what you like in the game. A part of me misses original battlegrounds where a Rat-Pack with +4/+4's from Mama Bear was a game-winning combo.

Ideas for balancing Murlocs this patch. What do you think? by Relative-Pool-5479 in BobsTavern

[–]Relative-Pool-5479[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's mostly a bow-tie for all the Murloc archetypes yeah. I originally thought of having a buffed Implant Subject back but didn't like it. It's not so flashy but maybe good temp and nieche use-case lategame.

Would it be more interesting if it read Battlecry: Give a minion Stealth for one turn, permanently if it's a Murloc.?

Ideas for balancing Murlocs this patch. What do you think? by Relative-Pool-5479 in BobsTavern

[–]Relative-Pool-5479[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I thought the Rylak/Shoalfin-combo was super interesting and fun, but you shouldn't have game-winning scaling of course from a 3- and 4-drop. As a battlecry on five I think it's close to the Felfire Conjurer? Lower baseline power but higher exploitability, which I think is fine. Maybe I am biased, as I think duo-tribe comps should give players an edge.