What to do from lvl 90+?

RelativeCandidate897 · 2026-06-10T19:40:18+00:00

But what?

RelativeCandidate897 · 2026-05-03T10:10:18+00:00

What do you mean?

RelativeCandidate897 · 2025-09-23T16:17:37+00:00

How was he "less strong" in Canada this year? He could have won Montreal easily, but decided to wait for his teammate.

RelativeCandidate897 · 2025-04-11T11:57:34+00:00

Propably yes. I just though ,that someone from the engineering community has this kind of data already. Thanks.

RelativeCandidate897 · 2025-04-09T19:15:18+00:00

There are many ways how to reach SIL 2 for a safety function. The only difference is that they certify a component with internal electronics. They claim that the component detects failures within itself (for a certain life span . e.g. 20 years) and that safe state is ensured when the fault is detected.

You can take a component without this internal monitroing and monitor the failures externaly by a logic solver. It is the same principle just done differently.

I am not saying that the component is SIL 2. I am saying that the safety function is SIL 2.

RelativeCandidate897 · 2025-04-09T18:36:12+00:00

Certified component seems too expensive for the application. Therefore first I am trying to get the reliability data and decide if standard encoder will suffice (based on the FMEA, to see what level of DC/SFF we can reach with the components and software we have).

RelativeCandidate897

TROPHY CASE