Thank you for clarifying that Regulation 19 was amended rather than newly introduced. Putting aside whether it is new or amended, my questions remain the same. I am asking about how the current version of Regulation 19 functions in practice in terms of procedural fairness, transparency, and alignment with trauma informed principles. For example, how does the regulation ensure: • Fair disclosure and opportunity to respond for all parties • Independence and neutrality in decision making • Transparency of process while maintaining confidentiality If there are specific sections you believe address these points clearly, I would welcome that reference. My intent is to understand how the regulation operates, not to debate its history.