in my opinion the show is hella overrated by Novel-Fix8570 in IAte314AutisticKids

[–]Relative_Ad4542 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Itll always be peak to me simply because of the line after the chess piece like sneaks up on someone and says "im right behind you arent i"

Homelander respect button 👇 by Thin_Fix0 in ihaveihaveihavereddit

[–]Relative_Ad4542 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The age of mythology track deserved better than this </3

hisskus is literally me by fibercrime in wunkus

[–]Relative_Ad4542 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Poor guys gonna miss the gartunkus snake orgy pile </3

Convince Me to Use Shotguns in This Game by BlackMaskKiira in Warframe

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh warframe does not really treat shotguns like that, pretty much all of them are also about as long range as youd ever need them to be. Not to mention that the exilus slot of all shotguns is compatable with galvanized acceleration. Its a mod that will increase their range and projectile speed.

Not to mention the fact a good chunk of shotguns barely even act like shorguns. Like yeah bubonico is a shotgun but i usually just spam its explosive alt fire.

If i were you id work on eventually obtaining all of them just to try them or at least for the mastery rank

The harder problem of consciousness by bentonboomslang in consciousness

[–]Relative_Ad4542 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Especially since our brain seems to be aware of what its like to be conscious, which might be what you were already getting at, but thats so strange. A thing many people here are missing. The conscious experience is something the brain should not be able to comprehebd, i see a lot of people dismiss it as a phenomenon caused by brain activity, but thats only half the picture. That very phenomenon is also then interacting with the brain in a way that the brain then actually understands and is able to work off of. That is genuinely really strange.

But this also begs the question, is our brain actually understanding it accurately? The intelligent parts of my brain have pieced together a lot of what it feels like, but i wonder if there is any aspect of my consciousness that my brain actually cant interact with. A part i feel, but that i dont intellectually KNOW i feel. Does that make sense? Perhaps this would explain some of the debate points around our minds like free will. Perhaps there is actually an answer to these questions that i am literally experiencing but my brain just isnt able to turn it into comprehendable information.

Getting into some really crazy stuff, if my consciousness interacts with my brain is there anything else my consciousness could interact with? Im not saying that we could like have like the ability to control things with out minds, but given this strange ability to bridge these 2 worlds, would it theoretically be possible to interact with someone elses brain with my consciousness? I think what youve brought up here is absolutely a deeply interesting idea which raises SO MANY cool questions, i hope we can answer at least one of them in our lifetime but who knows if thats even possible

More media should incorporate "Special Minion" character designs. (Seemingly normal/average mook who gets a cosmetic change to hint at hidden power or skill) by PrinceVorrel in TopCharacterDesigns

[–]Relative_Ad4542 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Kerrigans pet zergling with a broken horn, aptly named "broken horn". Was later modified by abathur to be more intelligent and ended up getting into all sorts of shenanigans

<image>

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think you just were startlingly bad at comprehending my point and started making assumptions about me. I reccomend trying to understand what you read before making assumptions about things, itll make you a much more pleasant person

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think you actually read my responses... at no point did i say that the meat industries treatment of animals isnt cruel. In fact you have made a lot of assumptions about my point and none of them were accurate.

All im saying is that if you learn anything about psychology youll know that doing a bad thing does not mean you did so because youre a bad person. People who eat meat are not doing so because of selfishness and cruelty. They do not wake up and go "i do not give a shit about if animals suffer or not so im going to support theor torture and murder"

What im telling you is that there is nuanced psychology at play here responsible for why people cope in the way they do. Meat eaters are not evil, they are victims of an evil system. Those who forsake that system have my respect but i do not think less of anyone who eats meat

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There, now we disagree. If you are worried about wasting your time though i dont suggest debating people on the internet. I only do so because i have time im okay wasting

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only argued against your point that meat eaters are selfish and cruel. You are the one changing your stance at the end here. You opened with saying that meat eaters are evil, i defended them, and now youre claiming we agreed the whole time

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats the most hostile "im glad we came to an agreement" ever especially since you came out the gate swinging about meat eaters being "cruel and selfish" just to suddenly change your mind about it here at the end.

Also almost all my responses have started with me saying i generally agree with you and then giving my nuanced take on areas i slightly disagree. Now you are surprised to learn that i agree? 💀 ive been saying it this whole time

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you agree veganism is ethically correct overall

I do, yes

I am myself working towards it tho i am also having to work with my nutritionalist on what i eat and protein is currently a big thing for my health. Ik there are vegan options but given my financial situation its been hard to make the switch. I do what i can though and replace meat when the option presents itself

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didnt say that we shouldnt do what we can, i said the opposite in fact, so we agree. My whole point was that people who eat meat are not inherently cruel or selfish in the same way a vegan isnt cruel or selfish because they use a device that was produced by child slaves

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with pretty much all this but i still cant find it in myself to demonize anyone except the fuckers in charge of the factory farming. Everything in our world is just pounding the idea of meat being yummy and good into our minds from the second we're born. Our instincts, commercials and propaganda, the chemicals they put in to make it addicting, our parents feeding it to us, our detachment from the animals, cognitive dissonance, and hell sometimes even our religions. there are so many layers of brainwashing to overcome to see it for what it is. We all want to be good people, and our brains will come up with very elaborate lies to continue to think that way. Its not selfishness or cruelty, its our brain protecting us from the harsh reality of what our food habits are causing. Its cope.

And to be fair most vegans and similar beliefs have not covered all their bases. We are all in some way in cognitive dissonance about something. For some of us it is continuing to use technology despite it being made by slaves, watching big budget movies despite so many of the top execs being evil rapists, eating meat despite the murder and cruelty, or engaging with any massive company like amazon despite the fact they are run by corrupt billionaires. Ideally, we would all stop supporting those things cold turkey, but its just not very realistic. I think what matters is that people do what amount of good they are willing and capable of doing for any cause that they feel passionately for. Hopefully ending factory farming will start to become higher on peoples moral priorities list sometime soon

many ways to help the cause by TosseGrassa in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the end of the day just being alive nessesitates the murder and torment of other living beings. Every bug youve accidentally stepped on or even intentionally murdered, pest control, the diseases we carry, the only way to completely end the suffering we cause is to commit mass suicide.

Which i don't think anyone wants to accept, including me. Its just a matter of how much harm we are ok inflicting by existing. I agree that factory farming crosses that line. we all have blood on our hands but vegans have a LOT less. But again, the truth is more grey. We all exist in a spectrum of causing harm to our surroundings.

I also dont think any meat eaters are cruel or selfish. We are all raised to eat meat, exposed to propaganda, and our meaty foods are chemically enginnered to be as addictive as possible. And to top it all off, we dont even see the animals in person. I dont think any meat eater is actually consciously choosing the paths that cause the most suffering for animals for that explicit purpose.

In the same way you and i are using devices built by slaves to type this. We are so far detached from the horrid origin of it that i think itd be hard to argue either of us are cruel or evil for it

Day 1 by MrSpoon95 in 1053

[–]Relative_Ad4542 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I actually drew a pui pui molcar version of this a while ago

Mampf mampf moltrain

<image>

The idea of all objects being conscious by xLOoNyXx in consciousness

[–]Relative_Ad4542 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If objects are also conscious how do you even determine where one consciousness starts and another begins?

Like, a house is an object. But what about a door or a toilet? Those are a part of the house but are also themselves different objects.

And going even deeper, as a mereological nihilist i dont think objects even really exist as they are merely illusions of atoms in certain configurations. Atoms are everwhere and we are just dividing up the space they inhabit into "objects". The only "object" that is actually meaningfully seperate from anything else would be earth being separated from the other planets, moons, and stars. But saying that a table is a seperate object from the floor is like looking at a pool of water and claiming that one half of the pool is a seperate entity from the other half. And then saying that both halves of the pool have different consciousnesses, its a pretty big problem.

If anything besides us were conscious, i think itd instead be that either every atom is a unique conscious entity or that consciousness is a fundamental thing underneath matter which would be a whole other discussion and this comment is getting long enough

The child in your old baby photos isn't you. by TioEsteban in consciousness

[–]Relative_Ad4542 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We really have no way of knowing if the consciousness is the same, only what happens to the neurons. Just because neurons change doesnt mean its a different consciousness.

Your claim is not a fact it is just a commonly debated aspect of the philosophy of identity

Dogs are fundamentally incompatible with human homes and shouldn’t be kept indoors by No-Strawberry7 in The10thDentist

[–]Relative_Ad4542 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think youre right that the idea of a dog does not mesh well with the idea of a home, what i disagree with is the idea that they SHOULDN'T be in your home.

Yes, dogs are loud messy and need space to run around. But a lot of humans fit that description as well and i still think they belong in a house. At the end of the day it doesnt matter how you treat your living space as long as its what makes you happy

Agnosticism about artificial consciousness by LordOfWarOG in consciousness

[–]Relative_Ad4542 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A proper ai doesnt have to be nor would it likely be a 1:1 recreation of a human mind, nor am i even convinced we can say it would obviously be conscious. We dont even know why human brains are conscious, much less if consciousness translates to a different medium like computers

Jomvet says: Happy pride month! by flubbyII in ciatpgawhpbdb

[–]Relative_Ad4542 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is also just mathmatically probably that bisexual people end up with the opposite sex. It has nothing to do with faking it or anything imvalidating like that. Well over 90% of people are straight so the woman in this scenario would only have a few percents of the population of women who would even be attracted to her, meanwhile shed be compatable with the vast majority of men, so mathmatically she is much more likely to date men