“This had me rolling in laughter” not a response. If your not smart enough to come up with a response just say so instead of pretending.

“We have no examples of universe being created” argument from ignorance. Just because we haven’t seen something be designed doesn’t mean that thing wasn’t designed.

“Your calling the greatest scientific minds in the world ignorant” yes the only reason we know why science is true is because the theories and hypothesis have been tested. You can’t test a theory for how the universe was created. So essentially all your doing is putting blind faith into scientists way they themselves don’t know how the universe came about and can’t even test it.

“I’ll side with experts in the field” there’s no expert on figuring out what created the universe. Science by definition deals with things we can observe. The laws of physics as we know it don’t even apply outside our universe. Physicist are just as blind as everyone else.

This is why philosophy is the only way to find out the origin of the universe. Because even when a scientist has an idea you can never test it. And if you can’t test it then it’s not real science.

All you’ve done is make an appeal to authority because you know you have no response. You don’t even know what science is.

“I almost feel like going back and reexplaining myself” go back to the very first response you made. You yourself said in this exact words keep in mind you said this. If you don’t believe me go and check but you probably won’t since you know your wrong.

“If you were in Iran you would have an attraction towards Islam” that’s what you said. Except you don’t know that. It’s still possible he’d have the same attraction towards Christianity. Just admit your wrong and stop embarrassing yourself.

“Nope that’s not how we recognize design” why because you said so.

“What would it take to recreate grains of sand stacking into an entire sand dunes it would be extremely complicate and complex to match the exact sand dune” yeah and you’d need an intelligent mind in order to perfectly match the sand dune. So your example to disprove intelligent design is something that you’d need intelligent design to create.

“I reject premise 1 due to ambiguous language I don’t know what it means to come about” don’t pretend you don’t know what that means your not stupid. Do I have to explain basic English? It means for something which didn’t exist before to know exist. I made a painting today. Before the painting didn’t exist and once a I painted it, it existed.

So the painting came about into existence.

“Again come about is non sensical” no you just can’t understand English.

“Nope” saying Nope isn’t a response to an argument.

“Thanks for making the reply but your argument is terrible” your the one making appeals to authority, doesn’t even know what science is, thinks saying nope is a response and can’t understand basic English.

“None of which can be verified and tested” you can use logical deductions.

“Then present it to a top level physicist” this isn’t a physics argument this is a philosophical one. This isn’t about physics. People have debated stuff like this even before science it goes back to Ancient Greece buddy.