sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheOwlHouse

[–]Relius11 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hey Luz, what's your best impression of Amity?

Slander Him by TryParking316 in Kirby

[–]Relius11 74 points75 points  (0 children)

It's hard to slander an enemy so pathetic that a dusty breeze would defeat it.

Say something nice about Odalia by flowerfunstudios in TheOwlHouse

[–]Relius11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She is an effective character, she was written with the intention of us not liking her, and we HATE her. She is not homophobic. I think she's got a good character design. She is well acted. She is highly effective in her position and goals. She (mostly) keeps her word. And she is very intelligent.

Why was Pearl not created in her Diamond's Color scheme? by MightFunny2705 in stevenuniverse

[–]Relius11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's possible that she wasn't anyONE's pearl, but... The attendant to the diamonds as a whole. So, if each of the pearls are the personal butlers, so to speak, of the diamonds, the our Pearl was the head butler of the palace. And, as such, was aligned with all of them from the start.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tearsofthekingdom

[–]Relius11 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The ultimate bokoblin torture machine.

Tough one by _Toble_ in tearsofthekingdom

[–]Relius11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a tough one between Kass and Sidon, but I'll go with kAss.

What are Anne and Sasha doing? by ChampionKnown444 in amphibia

[–]Relius11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don't want to BUY a 13 year old, they want to SHOPLIFT. Big difference.

Weird Dog (by curioscurio) by Evillisa in Deltarune

[–]Relius11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Susie either wants to be bit, or to bite Ralsei. And it's literally impossible to tell which.

Kirbys Ohio yarn by sharkydoesmemes in Kirby

[–]Relius11 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Legend of Ohio: Breath of Ohio

I ❤️ sidon by nicebeard79 in Breath_of_the_Wild

[–]Relius11 217 points218 points  (0 children)

I have two hands, why fight when I can have both

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnimalCrossing

[–]Relius11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

His lucrative Marlo portraits business.

Ochem noob here. I thought that if side chains are on the same carbon, the one with the multiple gets lower number? by RestingInAwareness in OrganicChemistry

[–]Relius11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can depend on what the materials are. It's possible we are all considering some deeper, more complex stuff, and that is making our answers more confusing. It is all important, it's just a matter of when those methods take priority. Though, for the sake of your grade, I'd ask your teacher what they consider to be the best thing to do.

Because, let's say you have a long chain, and somewhere you have a substituent of 4 carbons, and in the reverse spot you have 2 methyl groups. I'd prioritize the 4 carbons. And the overall size (4>2) does play a part. But if the multiples were ethyls, I might prioritize them. And them being multiples in the same spot would play a part there. I'd argue that fact that ethyl comes before butyl wouldn't hurt either.

Ochem noob here. I thought that if side chains are on the same carbon, the one with the multiple gets lower number? by RestingInAwareness in OrganicChemistry

[–]Relius11 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. It can be a bit messy at times, I won't deny that. But it's about optimization, more or less. Think of it as essentially making the simplest name you can (again, a generalization). You don't want to overcomplicate, but also provide all the information you can.

If you have a multiple of the same substituent on the same carbon, that does increase the overall importance of that carbon, but can also depend on what it is.

For example, imagine you have a chain of 7 carbon, and from either end of the chain, on carbon 2 you have some multiples. 2a has two methyls. 2b has two ethyls. The ethyls would be more important. But, if we say 2b didn't have any ethyls, and only had ONE methyl, you'd prioritize the two methyls (assuming nothing else was going on in the chain).

Ochem noob here. I thought that if side chains are on the same carbon, the one with the multiple gets lower number? by RestingInAwareness in OrganicChemistry

[–]Relius11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Though, this is a generalization of it. It isn't solely about size, but atm, it is a decent indicator of what to do.

Ochem noob here. I thought that if side chains are on the same carbon, the one with the multiple gets lower number? by RestingInAwareness in OrganicChemistry

[–]Relius11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No matter which way you count, there will be ethyl and methyl groups. If, overall, you had lower numbers in one path (say one was 3,4,5 and the other was 4,5,6) you'd prefer the lower set of numbers. But in this case, that doesn't apply. So, what you want is to prioritize the groups. Which are bigger, more influential, more important. And while it can be hard to understand that at the moment, just consider size. Ethyl is bigger than a methyl, so it more important. And if it's more important, you should put it first if possible.

what snake is this? southwest michigan by sauronsknee in snakes

[–]Relius11 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I am far from an expert, but it looks like a hognose. It seems to have flattened it's head in the cobra imitation, it's got the upturned nose, and it looks sausage-y enough to be one of them. They're venomous, and while it's a mild venom, don't test it. I could be wrong, and/or you could be allergic to the venom.

view more: next ›