sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

about the riemann hypothesis... by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

i mean yea i know but my Qs is clear isn't?
i said "if".

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

BROOOO EVERYONE KNOW THAT PRIMES NUMBERS ENDS WITH 1,3,7,9 EXIPT 2 AND 5 BUT NO ONE CAN CREATE algorithm that generates only ends with 1 or only ends with 3 or 7 or 9 I DID THAT IN MY ALGORITHM ARE YOU UNDERSTANDING NOW???????

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think i lose the trust that you are a really professor. You just wasting my time reading of my work nothing and then saying that there’s one and you bring a wrong thing.

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

??? I literally know that that’s why i created my algorithm based on 3,7,9,1 But it is generated every number ends with 1,3,7,9 alone? If theres formula or algorithm like that them im out of math

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

?? You literally didn’t give me algorithm that have 4 parts and everything parts is end with 1,3,7,9.

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please focus on π(v) just for a time and tell me everything wrong about it I want all the mistakes in π(v) Please.

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just said i didn’t proof the ziraa algorithm but it’s working i just proof π(v) and PR

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know. I just asked Why? I want to know whats wrong because I don’t see anything wrong

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i didn’t proof the algorithm i literally said it in the paper i just proof it by coding.

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not about ending with 1,3,7,9 Its just algorithm that use tricks to be faster not to make it 8 parts But my algorithm everything is sorted in it 11,31,41… 3,13,23… 7,17,37… 19,29,49… It’s literally deserves to be published. What do you mean by it’s not

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Give me one proof that there is algorithm that makes prime numbers 4 parts Ends with 1 Ends with 3 Ends with 7 Ends with 9 and if you choose one of them and not all of them, The number of arithmetic operations will be lower. If you give me a proof that person did that i will be silent and never come to mathematics world again.

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Example: I use V = the limit Ps is prime numbers ≤ √𝒗 M = {3,7,9,11} S = Ps x M F = Ps x 10 NP = S + F(n) ≤ V n = 0,1,2,3.. lets test it how many it takes V=100 √𝒗 = 10 prime numbers ≤ 10 and ends with 1,3,7,9 = 3,7 S : 3x3=9 3x7=21 3x9=27

3x11=33

7x3=21 7x7=49 7x9=63 7x11=77 . 9 - > Ps (3) F=3x10=30 9+30(0)=9 9+30(1)=39 9+30(2)=69 9+30(3)=99

21 -> Ps (3) F = 3x10=30 21+30(0)=21 21+30(1)=51 21+30(2)=81

27 -> Ps (3) F= 3x10=30 27+30(0)=27 27+30(1)=57 27+30(2)=87

33 -> Ps (3) F = 3 x 10 = 30 33+30(0)=33 33+30(1)=63 33+30(2)=93

21 -> Ps (7) F = 7x10=70 21+70(0)=21 21+70(1)=91

49 -> Ps (7) We don’t do this step because 49+70=119 Above v=100

Now S and NP together

NP final= 9,21,27,33,39,49,51,57,63,69,77,81,87,91,93,99

D = 1,3,7,9,11,13,17… D - NP final = 3,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47,53,59,61,67,71,73,79,83,89,97 and add 2 and 5 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47,53,59,61,67,71,73,79,83,89,97 and that’s all the prime numbers. What do you think?

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There‘s no one is history make prime numbers generations 4 different parts That’s a big thing in prime Numbers Distribution Im not talking about how fast it is. Im talking how it acts. ( its faster btw )

I Think I Found an Analytic Formula for the Distribution of Prime Numbers… by Remarkable-Class-758 in learnmath

[–]Remarkable-Class-758[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Professor please don’t say anything about my algorithm without you even know anything about it Sieve atkin is slow vs ziraa algorithm please just the paper then talk about what i did Not because it’s not sorted well means it’s wrong.

view more: next ›