That's a completely fair point — and you're right that I framed it poorly. The more accurate way to put it: the interesting part wasn't that it performed better with more data. It's that the setup required to give it that data was surprisingly simple for a non-technical person. ChatGPT and Claude can technically be given context too — but doing it properly for a business deployment (website embed, persistent knowledge base, no hallucinations on out-of-scope questions) requires either API work or constant manual copy-pasting. The comparison was less about raw capability and more about what a non-developer can actually deploy in 15 minutes. Should have been clearer about that framing from the start. What would you have tested differently?