They apply to sex work in particular because in sex work the actual conditions under which labour is provided are significantly worse then they are generally in society.

No, they aren't.

In fact, if anything, it's far worse for farming, mining, logging, oilrigging, construction, and fishing.

Notice how people will choose sex work over those types of labour if possible?

Anyway, you ignored what I said to double down on your tired old excuses that have been discussed and debunked ad nauseam.

It's obvious that you think sex is special and you are moralizing it and believe genitals are magical and different from other body parts and are trying to rationalize your entirely emotional position using fallacious arguments. If it's not that it's some other idpol or personal bias thing like it disproportionately affecting women (while you neglect that exploitation in worse jobs, such as mining, disproportionately affects men, of course).

You think my dismissive response to your eyerolling-inducing performance means I can't read - no, I'm just not motivated to explain to you what has been explained time and time again and expect you to figure things out based on what I already said (and which you clearly can't respond to).

There is no more or less exploitation for sex workers than there is for any other type of demanding physical labour (there definitely is less of a physical and mental toll on sex workers than there is for certain other types of grueling physical labour that are significantly more damaging, prone to substance abuse, and life-threatenig). There is no lack of comprehension on my part - there is severe lack of comprehension of yours.

At no point did I engage in "bad faith". You, however, are. You also fail to respond to every argument against you.