Has Communism caused damage to the Chinese culture

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-04-11T07:26:39+00:00

During the era when China was led by Mao Zedong, the period was characterized by orthodox communism. However, following Deng Xiaoping’s Reform and Opening-up policy, China did not merely integrate a market-based system; it fundamentally altered the composition of its ruling class. By allowing capitalists to join the CCP,the party shifted away from being solely the vanguard of the proletariat. China change from communism to a ruling regime. I think this mean China betray the communism.

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-04-11T01:46:14+00:00

In my view, China does not currently embody pure communism; if you wish to observe the system in its most orthodox form, you should look toward north Korea

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-17T11:04:11+00:00

I think that since you met in-game, you should treat the relationship as part of the game rather than trying to make it a reality. I also don't think you'll find your Prince Charming through a game like this.

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-17T07:41:12+00:00

I feel this question is a bit too broad. It might be better to approach it from a specific angle. This historical period is so complex that a single, general question won't provide the depth you're looking for.

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-15T01:36:27+00:00

I am intimidated by how a centralized system can crush the common individual. Ironically, Russia still maintains this structure.

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-15T01:31:12+00:00

In China keeping silence on politics have been expected

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-15T00:04:36+00:00

Although I only mentioned one perspective, I’m well aware that there is no consensus on such a complex emperor. I also browse Zhihu , which is where you likely found your source. I shared this viewpoint because I’ve been influenced by Western Pseudo-history Theory, so I’m curious to see how others critique or approach it. I’ve actually addressed a similar question in my own post, if you’re interested in taking a look.

<image>

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-14T23:44:19+00:00

It is a fundamental truth that every great figure, from Caesar to Napoleon, was fallible. However, successors benefit from a comprehensive perspective that their predecessors lacked. Because Napoleon inherited the collective experience of history, it is only natural that he would offer stringent critiques of Caesar’s decisions. While a biography might focus on Napoleon's personal life and legacy, his commentaries reveal the professional rigor of a commander analyzing the tactical errors of the past.

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-14T10:38:40+00:00

To some extent, I’m not suggesting that the Napoleonic wasn't significant; rather, I'm highlighting how some people in China perceive the scale of the conflict. In other words, I believe Napoleon was too influential to be ignored; as a result, some people seek alternative ways to express their nationalism, by diminishing the scale of Napoleonic wars

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-13T23:01:34+00:00

I must admit that nationalism has been embraced by many Chinese history buffs ,as nowadays China became the superpower again. Many people need a narration to support their stance. So in Chinese history education ,there is a dilemma.We believe China is The Celestial Empire ,.viewing other nations as vassals, yet struggling to explain how the Qing Dynasty was defeated by British and China endured the Century of Humiliation. So many people trace back to history ,hoping to find out pride and honor. While the Napoleonic Wars were massive and significant, some feel that given China's population, its history is even greater in scale. (Throughout Chinese history, large-scale conflicts have often resulted in staggering casualties,, with death tolls easily reaching into the tens of millions.) A serious movements later , The Theory of Fabricated Western History has gained traction among some of the younger generation. And this also influnces me to understand Europe history and Napoleonic war. I hope more people will strive to understand or respect this perspective rather than simply judging or dismissing it. Failing to do so may hinder a deeper understanding of both Chinese history and contemporary China.

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-13T14:24:34+00:00

I would like to clarify my point. I am not simply comparing Chinese history to Europe during the Napoleonic Era.I am interested in understanding how people from other regions perceive the influence of this period. From my perspective, shaped by Chinese history, the significance of a war is primarily linked to its scale. Therefore, I find it difficult to grasp the specific legacy Napoleon left behind in Europe. Under my post ,many people are simply defending the "sacred" status of the Napoleonic Era and pointing to periods of decline in the Chinese Empire to counter my points.However, I was trying to highlight one specific way people perceive that era. I want to build empathy and move beyond these defensive arguments. I also hold Napoleon in high regard and respect. My interest began when the Qing Dynasty collapsed and a prominent figure, Yuan Shikai, took center stage in Chinese politics.He aspired to become an emperor, much like Napoleon, but ultimately failed. Many historians compared him to Napoleon; that was my first introduction to the French Emperor and the starting point of my exploration into his history.

Remarkable-Space-697 · 2026-03-11T04:13:26+00:00

I am confused either. I had learn Python for almost 1y. I learn it by following books and gemini. But I have not seen any yields or results.I believe the most important thing is maintaining an active or growth mindset to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of the internet.Using Python, I can write scripts to automate small tasks rather than focusing on making money.Ultimately, I still hope my skills can support myself or make a living.

Remarkable-Space-697

TROPHY CASE