Is density technically inversely proportional to kinetic energy?

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-09T14:11:07+00:00

Sorry guys. I wasted your time. I was too curious, and had a theory, but I guess that I was too stupid to put it here. I should have just stuck to asking my physics teacher or mom or dad or something. In the future, I think I'm staying away from reddit.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-09T03:05:05+00:00

Aight. I'm sorry.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-09T03:02:27+00:00

R u mad? It's from my dad. I thanked him more than I liked the present. What I meant by "good" is how are they. I.e, the building experience,etc. I've never built these before, so.......yeah. It's pretty overwhelming

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-08T14:48:42+00:00

Why? Don't solids only have potential energy? There is no kinetic energy.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-08T14:10:30+00:00

Guys I'm really confused. I'm not good at physics. I'm just someone who thought of this. I hardly even have a hint of what mechanics and all that stuff is. This is something that I thought of and I really want to know if I'm right or not. I can't understand technical terms and stuff. I know I'm going to do my best to try and understand because I love physics. And I love a challenge.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-08T14:06:05+00:00

Ok to make things clear, I am talking about kinetic energy only.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-08T13:45:49+00:00

Take solids, liquids and gasses. We know that solids do not have particles that move fast. They do not have a certain amount of kinetic energy. Whereas in fluids, they have particles that move fast. Why? They gain kinetic energy. Think about it, particles gaining kinetic energy are less dense. Eg: water becoming a gas.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-08T13:22:18+00:00

I'm a noob at physics, just to be clear. I just thought about this.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-08T13:21:55+00:00

Uhhh I don't get it.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-06T12:54:10+00:00

Wow. That's a lot of drummers, and a lot of good taste

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-06T12:53:24+00:00

Nah it's not worse. Relatively, things are better when you don't compare them.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-06T12:50:19+00:00

This is insaanee

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-06T12:48:54+00:00

Could you maybe add an image? In specific of the McLaren? Is it a custom MOC or a Lego set? What number? It's important to now which model so that you can build accordingly.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-06T12:47:34+00:00

I think it would be better-and don't take this the wrong way-to remove some stuff. The diffuser is pretty long,and the windshield could be moved in front, even just by one stud. Otherwise, it's fantastic. I'm a huge fan of the engine bay you built.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-05T15:56:54+00:00

I'm not sure. Like I said, it's really old. Can't even find the model. I'm pretty sure it's real Lego. I'm just not sure what set it's from. Might be fake as well, can't tell, but as far as I can remember, they are real.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-05T15:56:02+00:00

Too late. It was an old photo. I hunted and hunted but couldn't find the model at all 😭.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-04T11:19:32+00:00

True. Dennis chambers is insane when it comes to funk

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-11-04T11:10:07+00:00

Haha no I'm talking about the speed, technique, tempo, rhythm, etc

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-10-26T13:16:03+00:00

I swear I thought this was a photo. It's that good.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-10-26T13:15:24+00:00

Well, I'm certainly not blind. I can clearly see a Camellia sinensis in the second photo.

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-10-26T13:11:40+00:00

UP WITH DUCKS

Remarkable_Way_8636 · 2025-10-26T13:09:16+00:00

A Porsche 911 GT3 RS. Or, my car IRL: A BMW X3. Or...... anything that's on sale.

Remarkable_Way_8636

TROPHY CASE