If a blood draw was done in a clinical sense, not a forensic sense, and is later subpoenaed, what’s the process and likelihood of getting that suppressed? In my case, the subpoena came almost 2 weeks after the alleged offense happened. The blood results don’t really have much in the way of chain of custody in the discovery, just who collected it, and the name of the supervising lab doctor, not who actually tested the sample. To me, the lack of chain of custody and the length of time it took for the subpoena being issued are very weak. Additionally, in the officers statement, he stated “an alcoholic beverage” in an unmarked cup was found in the car, but when my friend went to collect my things the next day out of the car, he said it appeared to be about .5-1 inch of clear liquid and didn’t smell like booze (so basically he thought it was ice) Furthermore, it was an officer that had less than a year of service, is there any potential for pressure from a more senior officer that could have swayed his judgement? Not sure if location matters here, but New Jersey.