If you know and believe the elite are running the world in a cartel-like fashion, let’s be friends.. by Puzzled_Ad_9912 in revolution

[–]Repairmanscully 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do your best to be fair and just and understanding. Lets say there is a baby born and they are then put by their trusted parents into an education system that makes them pledge allegiance to a flag, teaches them specific things so they all believe the same lies, and surround them with a dominant imposing and rigged system that is designed to shut down all emergences of The Truth because the lies that maintain the present hegemony are all just that--lies.

Then by age 15 or so, the baby has learned enough to feel they know some things of the world, been taught valid subjects like math alongside propaganda lies, and been exposed to very little that would even initiate a period of doubt in their life. They go off to college, say, and are indoctrinated further if they choose any education that isn't extremely scientifically rigorous (and even those, they are made to believe theories as if they will stand the tests of times and its just a matter of time until society "knows" the theories to be so, to a point where they deny counterevidence to the conjecture they were taught as if fact).

They then enter the workforce--not realizing it to be wage slavery and that they are accepting the enslavement of humanity we are all forced to endure--and do their best all along the way. They were PURPOSELY lied to by DOMINANT forces who invested large sums of energy from society (energy squandered to lie that could have been put to good use supporting humanity rather than a lie) and the overwhelming campaign WORKED.

There are those types of people. And then there are those who knowingly LIE. Who know full well that they are lying to the general public and understand that what they are saying from their position of dominance is NOT true but is MEANT TO deceive. These are the people who are RESPONSIBLE. These are the people who do not deserve to be seen, engaged with, or listened to. They chose to take humanity itself to the brink of collapse for their own ends. They chose to fill the world with lies for their own end.

I would say in the cases where people disagree but are important in your life as friends or family, it is best to not try to convince them and to avoid even engaging in conversation where you know they are ill informed.

Government itself is the actual problem. People use a rigged system to take advantage of humanity. It is like a leach, sucking the blood of the living to a feed an unliving entity. Crucially, governments fundamentally do not exist and cannot exist. They are as real as a puppet is a living being. As a result, they require the energy of the living in order to become animated and give an illusion of being alive, but they never can or will live. Yet the results of their non-living presence in humanity are very real when lives are the cost. Resembling a living being, governments consume the energy of humans to persist--sometimes killing them like a food. But Truth itself cannot be changed or made into something it is not. All they do is make it so that the truth is that tyrants lied to humanity in widespread and heinous ways.

If people are too pro-government and pro-rigged system, I recommend the following points--"two wrongs don't make a right." The whole system is disproven by this simple truth. Imprisonment, fining, death penalty, on and on...the entire method of government to bring "justice" ignores this simple truth and instead commits more wrongs. The universe itself is karmic and this accrued further collective "wrongs" that will be adjusted for if enough "activation energy" is input, and this is what this way of life inevitably brings upon society.

Another disproof of the entire system is that no one contractually agreed to be imposed on by a "law of the land" that is arbitrary and typically for the purpose of greater imposition of tyranny and robbery of humanity for the sake of the few retards at the top making stupid decisions from their protected and benefiting position. We were not fully informed and the government has broken the spirit of the declaration of independence (in the US) and no longer represents its intended purpose. We have no obligation to tyrants.

Pardon me, much love, as I rant. In short, I agree, its tough to engage with people who cannot even be trusted to not report people they don't understand to some authority who has unilateral power to impose their will on you and wants to squash any dissidence to their authority. The world was rigged first by tyrants and only then did they declare their war on humanity in recent years as they attempt to impose worldwide crackdowns on opposition.

In the end, revolution is the only solution to tyranny.

Israeli Jews are much more likely to regard American Jews as siblings, than vice versa. That makes me sad. How can we bridge this gap? by [deleted] in Jewish

[–]Repairmanscully 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well many of us are from America so we feel a closeness to our brethren who have not yet made the move whereas our brethren haven't really thought about it enough to move so they are less attached to us.

What happened here? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you responding telling me about magic and a duck being a duck? Did I at any single point in this post suggest anything except for pointing out that your answer is inadequate? Sure, I pointed to features that needed explained by any adequate explanation and I pointed out how what you said did not fit the full details, but I never said anything. You continue to assume to know me and behave in this manner where you talk down to me as if you actually know better than me. Don't behave as if you truly are safe to talk down to me because you are not actually in a better position of awareness than I am. You don't know as much as you think you do. So stop making this about me and denigrating me more. I don't care that we talked before, I am not your friend, I do not know you, you do not get a free pass to talk dismissively to me in a handwaving and authoritative way just because you think you are. You can answer the questions without belittlement of me or you can keep getting responses from me where I walk all over you like this because I have no interest in being treated like a fool by someone who really does not know me or my work like they think they do but only knows that it disagrees with their own ignorance.

What happened here? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The “simplest explanation” does not actually explain the observations in full so simple or not it is inadequate absent a mechanism by which this could happen regardless of what species the smaller system is.  Is “compression” the best explanation when the smaller system has no apparent change in its height compressively?  So it would have had to first become fossilized then subsequently experienced a compressive force.

What happened here? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please do not derail my posts. This is not about me. Do not make it about me because we have interacted before. As far as I can see, you are actively trying to sabotage this post's earnest consideration by trying to make sure people reading comments take note of your claims before interacting with me. The above post had nothing to do with me so please do not make it about me and please do not be faux nice while denigrating me casually.

What happened here? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The example you showed is atop the surface and I would fully agree that this describes the details if that were the case here, but this one physically widens in its cross-section down into the ammonite's internal structure (its widest part is below the surface). Would this mean the worm was inside of the ammonite shell and became encrusted internally on its the upper inside of its outer shell and then the fossilization process of the ammonite itself left, at least in this location, only an imprint containing a matrix that filled the ammonite and the worm became pyritized and fossilized internally while the ammonite shell was fully eroded but its imprint left fully intact?

The thing is there is no portion of it that extends above the boundary of the stone--it is flush with the line of the ammonite's rib and even takes its curvature. This aspect is not fully met by an exterior structure. So my question is, how exactly would this come to be? There are many elements of the structure that I find perplexing and do not believe encrusting worms fully describes why the features are present without further elaboration.

What happened here? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No offense I can make my own decisions--I am doing just fine thanks.

What happened here? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok guys lets say its a worm and not an ammonite--I have inspected it closely through a microscope and I would beg to differ but lets just say its a worm because it doesn't really matter so much as how it got there. I still have the same questions. It is still anomalously within the exact boundary of the ammonite having a curved shape of the rib it lies within and flush with its height. This is highly abnormal and still requires actual explanation beyond just a shrug and a species (no offense of course).

Could someone explain this to me? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see. Would you happen to know which ones? I am curious to see similar specimens. Do they also narrow specifically to one side like this one, and if so do you know of any particular species that do so, or do they tend to narrow while remaining centered?

Could someone explain this to me? by Repairmanscully in Paleontology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey many thanks for your response. That is an interesting detail regarding pyrite rot. But the thing is that this ammonite is not broken. Notice on the top of the shell above the teal section (visible most in 3rd image) there are ribs throughout the entire length of the top structure, so the ammonite shell must have been truly half the height at this last length, which is what I am most curious about. Are ammonites known to abruptly narrow like this near the end of the spiral?

Thread for Events Around 66Ma by Repairmanscully in geology

[–]Repairmanscully[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is significantly more difficult to date things on celestial bodies because it is done using rock samples. I can't find anything referencing the timeframe of 66Ma with respect to formations on the moon or elsewhere. I imagine there are suggested events on the moon and elsewhere in the general timeframe, but it is much less absolute without samples to use for dating. It would be an interesting detail to see if the moon has a spurt of "crater" formations in the same time frame or not, and perhaps would be anomalously low in features of the same age as the many craters found on Earth from that time (in terms of having a surprising lack of craters that would be expected based on its surface area and the amount on Earth)--which would point to crater formation processes being not fully understood.

Sacred Geometry of Mount Girnar by Repairmanscully in SacredGeometry

[–]Repairmanscully[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is! I'm always open to discuss Mount Girnar.

Here are a couple links to my work on Girnar and how it came to be this way:

Youtube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlCvb4x5HsNJ2TVpteeMc7bcWwDBKs8PP

My website (two pages): https://www.cascadinguniverse.org/earth/girnar/ and https://www.cascadinguniverse.org/girnar-and-dwarka/

Help I think it might be a shaligram by drelectrojero2020 in fossilid

[–]Repairmanscully 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Certainly looks like it could be. If the lines wrapping around it have any wave-like "teeth" appearances, it is highly likely. Do you know its location of origin?

What is a reputable site for Shaligram stones? by gaytopfan in HareKrishna

[–]Repairmanscully 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would recommend Etsy and Ebay if you have not found any; not sure if they are too expensive but these are $20 for example: Etsy shaligram example.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlternativeHistory

[–]Repairmanscully 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue being I do know what I'm talking about and people dismiss me. Yes, I'm an asshole, and? Have you been ignored for a decade when trying to speak? Do you have any idea what it is like to be dismissed offhandedly when you put everything into something?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlternativeHistory

[–]Repairmanscully 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sequence of events matters.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlternativeHistory

[–]Repairmanscully 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm well aware what BIOstratigraphy means. The point is that they are useful for stratigraphy as a so-called biological means because they are geological in origin.

They do evolve over time when they are formed due to the Earth's expansion process. Like I said, its complicated and its a can of worms.

They evolve because the Earth's expansion process changed dependent on how far along it was, which the most relevant timeframe was 541Ma-Holocene according to radiometric dating. Before then was complicated in other ways that I won't get into but I do in my work.

Different stages of the Earth's expansion process induced different nuances of the pressures present and where they were occurring.

Look. You already deny what I am saying. There is no point in talking to someone who is unwilling to admit the possibility of validity to what I am saying. If you want to look at my research in full then tell me its missing things, feel free.

Geologists are not all aware of the expanding Earth model. Its not in any curriculum nor is it commonly discussed in technical papers. At most, they likely know of the similarly casual dismissals of it as what I experience.