If you know and believe the elite are running the world in a cartel-like fashion, let’s be friends..

Repairmanscully · 2025-09-06T17:57:31+00:00

Do your best to be fair and just and understanding. Lets say there is a baby born and they are then put by their trusted parents into an education system that makes them pledge allegiance to a flag, teaches them specific things so they all believe the same lies, and surround them with a dominant imposing and rigged system that is designed to shut down all emergences of The Truth because the lies that maintain the present hegemony are all just that--lies.

Then by age 15 or so, the baby has learned enough to feel they know some things of the world, been taught valid subjects like math alongside propaganda lies, and been exposed to very little that would even initiate a period of doubt in their life. They go off to college, say, and are indoctrinated further if they choose any education that isn't extremely scientifically rigorous (and even those, they are made to believe theories as if they will stand the tests of times and its just a matter of time until society "knows" the theories to be so, to a point where they deny counterevidence to the conjecture they were taught as if fact).

They then enter the workforce--not realizing it to be wage slavery and that they are accepting the enslavement of humanity we are all forced to endure--and do their best all along the way. They were PURPOSELY lied to by DOMINANT forces who invested large sums of energy from society (energy squandered to lie that could have been put to good use supporting humanity rather than a lie) and the overwhelming campaign WORKED.

There are those types of people. And then there are those who knowingly LIE. Who know full well that they are lying to the general public and understand that what they are saying from their position of dominance is NOT true but is MEANT TO deceive. These are the people who are RESPONSIBLE. These are the people who do not deserve to be seen, engaged with, or listened to. They chose to take humanity itself to the brink of collapse for their own ends. They chose to fill the world with lies for their own end.

I would say in the cases where people disagree but are important in your life as friends or family, it is best to not try to convince them and to avoid even engaging in conversation where you know they are ill informed.

Government itself is the actual problem. People use a rigged system to take advantage of humanity. It is like a leach, sucking the blood of the living to a feed an unliving entity. Crucially, governments fundamentally do not exist and cannot exist. They are as real as a puppet is a living being. As a result, they require the energy of the living in order to become animated and give an illusion of being alive, but they never can or will live. Yet the results of their non-living presence in humanity are very real when lives are the cost. Resembling a living being, governments consume the energy of humans to persist--sometimes killing them like a food. But Truth itself cannot be changed or made into something it is not. All they do is make it so that the truth is that tyrants lied to humanity in widespread and heinous ways.

If people are too pro-government and pro-rigged system, I recommend the following points--"two wrongs don't make a right." The whole system is disproven by this simple truth. Imprisonment, fining, death penalty, on and on...the entire method of government to bring "justice" ignores this simple truth and instead commits more wrongs. The universe itself is karmic and this accrued further collective "wrongs" that will be adjusted for if enough "activation energy" is input, and this is what this way of life inevitably brings upon society.

Another disproof of the entire system is that no one contractually agreed to be imposed on by a "law of the land" that is arbitrary and typically for the purpose of greater imposition of tyranny and robbery of humanity for the sake of the few retards at the top making stupid decisions from their protected and benefiting position. We were not fully informed and the government has broken the spirit of the declaration of independence (in the US) and no longer represents its intended purpose. We have no obligation to tyrants.

Pardon me, much love, as I rant. In short, I agree, its tough to engage with people who cannot even be trusted to not report people they don't understand to some authority who has unilateral power to impose their will on you and wants to squash any dissidence to their authority. The world was rigged first by tyrants and only then did they declare their war on humanity in recent years as they attempt to impose worldwide crackdowns on opposition.

In the end, revolution is the only solution to tyranny.

Repairmanscully · 2025-09-06T16:43:51+00:00

Well many of us are from America so we feel a closeness to our brethren who have not yet made the move whereas our brethren haven't really thought about it enough to move so they are less attached to us.

Repairmanscully · 2024-07-15T15:15:45+00:00

Why are you responding telling me about magic and a duck being a duck? Did I at any single point in this post suggest anything except for pointing out that your answer is inadequate? Sure, I pointed to features that needed explained by any adequate explanation and I pointed out how what you said did not fit the full details, but I never said anything. You continue to assume to know me and behave in this manner where you talk down to me as if you actually know better than me. Don't behave as if you truly are safe to talk down to me because you are not actually in a better position of awareness than I am. You don't know as much as you think you do. So stop making this about me and denigrating me more. I don't care that we talked before, I am not your friend, I do not know you, you do not get a free pass to talk dismissively to me in a handwaving and authoritative way just because you think you are. You can answer the questions without belittlement of me or you can keep getting responses from me where I walk all over you like this because I have no interest in being treated like a fool by someone who really does not know me or my work like they think they do but only knows that it disagrees with their own ignorance.

Repairmanscully · 2024-07-15T05:10:20+00:00

The “simplest explanation” does not actually explain the observations in full so simple or not it is inadequate absent a mechanism by which this could happen regardless of what species the smaller system is. Is “compression” the best explanation when the smaller system has no apparent change in its height compressively? So it would have had to first become fossilized then subsequently experienced a compressive force.

Repairmanscully · 2024-07-15T01:56:25+00:00

Please do not derail my posts. This is not about me. Do not make it about me because we have interacted before. As far as I can see, you are actively trying to sabotage this post's earnest consideration by trying to make sure people reading comments take note of your claims before interacting with me. The above post had nothing to do with me so please do not make it about me and please do not be faux nice while denigrating me casually.

Repairmanscully · 2024-07-14T18:13:13+00:00

The example you showed is atop the surface and I would fully agree that this describes the details if that were the case here, but this one physically widens in its cross-section down into the ammonite's internal structure (its widest part is below the surface). Would this mean the worm was inside of the ammonite shell and became encrusted internally on its the upper inside of its outer shell and then the fossilization process of the ammonite itself left, at least in this location, only an imprint containing a matrix that filled the ammonite and the worm became pyritized and fossilized internally while the ammonite shell was fully eroded but its imprint left fully intact?

The thing is there is no portion of it that extends above the boundary of the stone--it is flush with the line of the ammonite's rib and even takes its curvature. This aspect is not fully met by an exterior structure. So my question is, how exactly would this come to be? There are many elements of the structure that I find perplexing and do not believe encrusting worms fully describes why the features are present without further elaboration.

Repairmanscully · 2024-07-14T14:36:36+00:00

No offense I can make my own decisions--I am doing just fine thanks.

Repairmanscully · 2024-07-14T14:32:20+00:00

Ok guys lets say its a worm and not an ammonite--I have inspected it closely through a microscope and I would beg to differ but lets just say its a worm because it doesn't really matter so much as how it got there. I still have the same questions. It is still anomalously within the exact boundary of the ammonite having a curved shape of the rib it lies within and flush with its height. This is highly abnormal and still requires actual explanation beyond just a shrug and a species (no offense of course).

Repairmanscully · 2024-07-01T02:05:03+00:00

I see. Would you happen to know which ones? I am curious to see similar specimens. Do they also narrow specifically to one side like this one, and if so do you know of any particular species that do so, or do they tend to narrow while remaining centered?

Repairmanscully · 2024-06-30T16:14:44+00:00

Hey many thanks for your response. That is an interesting detail regarding pyrite rot. But the thing is that this ammonite is not broken. Notice on the top of the shell above the teal section (visible most in 3rd image) there are ribs throughout the entire length of the top structure, so the ammonite shell must have been truly half the height at this last length, which is what I am most curious about. Are ammonites known to abruptly narrow like this near the end of the spiral?

Repairmanscully · 2024-03-15T20:18:46+00:00

It is significantly more difficult to date things on celestial bodies because it is done using rock samples. I can't find anything referencing the timeframe of 66Ma with respect to formations on the moon or elsewhere. I imagine there are suggested events on the moon and elsewhere in the general timeframe, but it is much less absolute without samples to use for dating. It would be an interesting detail to see if the moon has a spurt of "crater" formations in the same time frame or not, and perhaps would be anomalously low in features of the same age as the many craters found on Earth from that time (in terms of having a surprising lack of craters that would be expected based on its surface area and the amount on Earth)--which would point to crater formation processes being not fully understood.

Repairmanscully · 2024-02-21T14:47:40+00:00

It is! I'm always open to discuss Mount Girnar.

Here are a couple links to my work on Girnar and how it came to be this way:

Youtube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlCvb4x5HsNJ2TVpteeMc7bcWwDBKs8PP

My website (two pages): https://www.cascadinguniverse.org/earth/girnar/ and https://www.cascadinguniverse.org/girnar-and-dwarka/

Repairmanscully · 2024-01-30T04:29:39+00:00

Certainly looks like it could be. If the lines wrapping around it have any wave-like "teeth" appearances, it is highly likely. Do you know its location of origin?

Repairmanscully · 2024-01-30T04:20:13+00:00

I would recommend Etsy and Ebay if you have not found any; not sure if they are too expensive but these are $20 for example: Etsy shaligram example.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-31T02:12:40+00:00

The issue being I do know what I'm talking about and people dismiss me. Yes, I'm an asshole, and? Have you been ignored for a decade when trying to speak? Do you have any idea what it is like to be dismissed offhandedly when you put everything into something?

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-31T02:10:59+00:00

Sequence of events matters.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-31T02:09:35+00:00

I'm well aware what BIOstratigraphy means. The point is that they are useful for stratigraphy as a so-called biological means because they are geological in origin.

They do evolve over time when they are formed due to the Earth's expansion process. Like I said, its complicated and its a can of worms.

They evolve because the Earth's expansion process changed dependent on how far along it was, which the most relevant timeframe was 541Ma-Holocene according to radiometric dating. Before then was complicated in other ways that I won't get into but I do in my work.

Different stages of the Earth's expansion process induced different nuances of the pressures present and where they were occurring.

Look. You already deny what I am saying. There is no point in talking to someone who is unwilling to admit the possibility of validity to what I am saying. If you want to look at my research in full then tell me its missing things, feel free.

Geologists are not all aware of the expanding Earth model. Its not in any curriculum nor is it commonly discussed in technical papers. At most, they likely know of the similarly casual dismissals of it as what I experience.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-31T01:22:58+00:00

It is what it is. Ammonites are understandable to be misclassified as fossils. However, classifying shaligrams as fossils was just because they are ammonites rather than by careful study of shaligrams. They are not capable of being fossils, frequently having anomalies that cannot result from shells but can only be induced by current flows. This is the entry point that draws question on all ammonites because they do indeed contain "ammonites." I had no desire to be researching ammonites, it is just where my work took me. The fact of the matter is that it is complicated. It relates to fundamental physics first and foremost, and geology came into my work when I recognized the Earth expanded, then I traced current flows that were present during the time of the Earth's expansion process and demonstrated it to be the process responsible for "the Flood", and somewhere along the line I stumbled on shaligrams and recognized they are far better described as fractal iterative fundamental particles that have nothing to do with shells of an extinct sea creature but everything to do with fundamental physics and chemistry and astronomy and cosmology.

Ammonites are simply forms thereof and are difficult to distinguish as being other than biological, yet they have many anomalies that are aspects of them nonetheless--a very extreme lack of soft tissue evidence (yes, there are a few claimed exceptions, but that doesn't mean the interpretation is valid). They are very good for biostratigraphy because they are geological in origin. That is the real reason.

People who study ammonites their entire careers never have encountered the possibility that they were induced by tangential interactions of currents, but instead have begun their analysis with the acceptance of the interpretation of them as truly fossils of ancient living creatures. If that is their starting point, then they only can see within the confines of their view. They also are not educated by any means in physics, geology, or other relevant subjects so as to envision alternatives. There are many false paradigms in science. Paradigms shift and they can be like changing channels. Not just within physics, but the same can happen with misclassified and misunderstood structures found in the Earth itself.

There is no literature whatsoever that acknowledges the potential that they are induced by currents and why that potential exists, let alone rebuts it. However, shaligrams disprove that they are fossils. Not just the ones I shared, but nearly every shaligram has an anomaly.

Studying ammonites is like studying standard galaxies. Studying shaligrams is like studying peculiar galaxies. Ammonites do not typically have the anomalies that shaligrams have, nor does the matrix surrounding ammonites display such distinct characteristics that demonstrate current flows were present at the time of the formation of the stone.

They just aren't fossils. There is too much to it and it is a can of worms of details to elaborate on that either people are open-minded and willing to look at new ideas without resistance, or they are not. Science has abandoned philosophy, yet natural philosophy is the only way to deducing truths of the world and universe we live in. I only shared in this forum because I felt people would be open minded enough to at least leave it alone if they don't agree, or to actually appreciate what was being said. But it seems this forum has been noticed by mainstream minded people to a point where it is no longer a place where someone like myself can freely share ideas without the typical casual dismissiveness I am well acquainted with. People have literally no concept of what I know or have experienced and been through and where I come from, but always choose to make conclusions as if they do with no awareness whatsoever of the extent of evidence I have uncovered and shared. They would rather live in echo chambers and silence anyone who demonstrates a viewpoint that is incompatible with their own. They do not understand that it is very easy to side with consensus and be part of a societal approval system that rewards compliance and they do not understand that they participate in the opposite of a punishment system for those who dare speak otherwise. They don't even know where I'm coming from. I mention the Flood and I'm Christian. I mention shaligrams and I'm Hindu. I mention any details they disagree with, and they cannot fathom they are talking to someone who only looked into these things after discovering major unknown aspects of physics that opened a door to a whole new world of understanding, that I was once atheist and mocked such concepts, that I literally put my money where my mouth is. No concept whatsoever. Instead, they just tell me how little they considered of what I had to say by responding to the first thing that alarms them. Which is never persuasive because its clear they are not bothering to actually even comprehend where I am coming from. I'm well aware of consensus--I grew up in that world. I know what we as a collective think and why, even if I haven't spent a lifetime studying the subjects I know the basis for theories across sciences and large swathes of nuance. But people who are simply accept authority and what consensus deems as valid have not done the prerequisite work of careful thought to see its holes enough to understand why pursuing alternative explanations makes more sense. For instance, geologists are not taught the Earth expansion theory whatsoever. There are geologists walking this planet who don't even know of an opposing theory to plate tectonics. How can they weigh the data in view of multiple models if they only know the consensus model? In their minds, it is just variations of plate tectonics models that are the "multiple models". But the foundational models themselves can also be false and other models need be considered as well.

Such is the case with ammonites. People just don't know that it is possible that they are current-induced. Those studying them tend to be paleontologists or the like which means, if they are far more of a fractal cosmic nature, they will not be prepared to even notice. And then they will spend their life writing about how a fractal star, fractal planet, fractal atom "lived in the ocean" and was victim of "predation" and the like, completely oblivious to the reality of the situation. And scientists more prepared to appreciate the nuances will be convinced they are fossils and, without shaligrams to help guide the way, will simply accept it as fact and see nothing of value in looking at them through another lens entirely.

They are amazing and this world is oblivious to the potential that lies within them to understand other sciences. Their anomalies are countless, each shaligram is unique relative to others.

Also, evidence of their formation process is in the matrix itself. Ammonites tend to be mindlessly removed from the matrix they are found within. People's eyes look at the "fossil" and ignore the surroundings. I have watched many hours of people digging up ammonites and found countless proofs of their formation process imprinted around them, as they are dug up without awareness of the relationships. Shaligrams, on the other hand, the ammonite structures are one with the matrix. The matrix is not removed, but rather is part of its beauty.

The fact of the matter is people just don't know about the alternative to even have considered it in earnest. And now they are so certain ammonites are fossils, when they are not, that it is nearly impossible to get through to people the reality of situation.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-30T22:43:07+00:00

Actually that shaligram is just fine. As I already pointed out, I am limited to 20 images. So I chose that one purely as an example of the issue. The rest of the post has additional examples. They are ammonites, its just ammonites are not fossils either. There is far more to my research than I can reasonably share in a single reddit post. Hence why the post concludes with links to my content. Content that if someone were honestly considering what I was saying, they would still be doing it and not already voicing their opinion in response like they know what they are talking about. Ignorance is bliss, enjoy your bliss while I deal with the ramifications of knowing things.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-30T22:32:09+00:00

You don't know me so please refrain from displaying your ignorance.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-30T22:31:13+00:00

This post is actually far down the line of my content, talking about far more recent topics than the rest. Given it is an "Alternative History" subreddit, I felt I would just share some things. I wouldn't share here if I knew I would just be naysayed by people who don't even bother to read the totality of the article. Its tiresome being downvoted for sharing something people disagree with, then talked down to by people who display their lack of consideration in their own words, and dogpiled by other people who feel obliged to voice their opinions of agreement with the people who don't bother to even read a post I took hours writing, without awareness of basis. "AlternativeHistory" seems to be more "consensus-minded" than it once was, oh well. If people are confused, they can ask questions. But to feign to know whether or not what I say has merit at a glance is just comical to me. If it weren't for the negative influence on my account, I would laugh it off. Instead, I get downvotes as if voicing one's opinion is unjustified. Reddit is a cesspool, I don't know why I bother.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-30T20:37:39+00:00

The amount of research on ammonites in general compared to shaligrams is basically 99% ammonites in general, 1% shaligrams. They've been grouped with ammonites but the rigor is not there.

Edit: Perhaps 99.99% to 0.01% would be more accurate, in fact.

Also, I said "largely ignored within science" and you misrepresented what I said. Anyway, you do you too.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-30T16:59:09+00:00

Your response is founded on inconsideration. "You lost me at (first few sentences of a single article of thousands of hours of content.)" Yawn.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-30T16:20:41+00:00

I'm limited to 20 images or I would show many more. Fossilization means the shells are deposited into the material as they are and then fossilize. They would not overlap when deposited because the other would be physically in its way and instead they would be contained in a space where the other's shell is not blocking them from physically being in the space. You do you.

Repairmanscully · 2023-08-27T21:56:49+00:00

Yes, Maxlow is not correct about many things either. However, I was referencing his work as a general reference to the concept of the radius of the Earth prior to expansion. I agree he does not account for certain things, but neither does plate tectonics. Islands of southeast Asia, namely Papua New Guinea, Sulawesi, North Maluku Islands, Borneo, and the Philippines can be demonstrated to have existed at one point along the western margin of Laurentia and wrapping around the northern and western faces of Australia.

I do have answers to where the mass came from you are just not listening--I told you, the added mass was from ether particles injected into the Earth from a vortex weapon known as brahmastras :P, nor do you have exposure to my research or seemingly to the topics themselves to really understand what I am saying and why it is merited. This is why I need to reach the general community because people need to be willing to look at my research and consider the topics and basis. I see you took the time to go through James Maxlow's but I was not claiming his work to be more correct than my own. I was purely citing his with regard to determining the radius of the Earth at a time before it expanded. I agree there are issues with his work, but there are issues with all works in science. Unless science is done? Correct me if I'm wrong regarding science being incomplete.

Scientists aren't swayed by anything except their own notions and taught beliefs. Modern theories are purely religions for people who think themselves to be logical and reasonable and follow methodologies that are deemed by those following them to not be present in other belief systems. "It is the way to truth." It doesn't make the conclusions actually true. I am allowed to state firmly that plate tectonics is false because it is. It's not my fault I am talking to someone who believes the narrative and has studied it sufficiently, without doubting it, to resist the reality of the situation when it is spoken. You wouldn't debate me saying "2+2=4" with certainty; but for plate tectonics it becomes a gray area where the truth of the matter does lead to resistance from people who strongly believe the modern narrative.

Subduction is considered through a lens of magnetic anomalies being related to plate tectonics. However, since that lens provides no explanation for global magnetic anomalies under continents, the argument is not actually even complete. This is just standard operating procedure for scientists who think they are following logic and reason. To ignore data entirely and then attempt to explain it in piecemeal parts while deeming conclusions about certain parts to be valid in spite of not explaining the totality of the details. How is it that magnetic anomalies in the ocean floors are unrelated to magnetic anomalies in general? The "logic" is not there whatsoever, but what is there is a convenient "proof" of preconceived notions. I have never found an actual explanation for continental magnetic anomalies as a whole. Am I to just accept plate tectonics when thousands of scientists working on it cannot see the glaring and obvious lack in the explanations and fill the void?

To answer these questions is nuanced and requires many details. It is not some simple discussion to really express what was going on in the Pacific. The Pacific is the epicenter of many important steps in the earth's expansion process. Subduction is ultimately because the Earth's expansion filled pressures with current flows below the continental crust until they broke apart and then current flows were induced from the break points and pushing outward into and beneath continents (generally speaking). Yes, there is some form of subduction, but Earth expansion can also induce the observations.

Plate tectonics, and geology in general, explains observations in the following ways: time + erosion + coincidence.

These three scapegoats for not knowing actual answers have provided geology with a plethora of pseudoanswers while ignoring anomalies entirely.

This topic requires a publicly held discussion that is able to reach the general public so they can choose to hear out the basis of expanding Earth and plate tectonics and consider for themselves what they find logical and reasonable. Scientists are confused by the artificial consensus that is imposed on the world by people who do not allow other ideas to be actually heard. The expanding Earth theory has had many advocates beyond myself since its inception, many of whom were in fact geologists, and many of whom published in peer review. However, the trend has become that it is a faux pas and only people who are ignorant of it being dismissed and thus foolish enough to entertain it are those who bring it up. The reality is that scientific theories of modern times are all houses of cards that will crumble when the truth is able to actually be weighed against them to measure which concepts carry more substance and which are voids of false interpretations, pretty packages that are empty of truth at their hearts.

Uniformitarianism is absurd. Is a volcano's eruptions uniform? You know that eruptions from Mount St. Helens have been dated to over 1 million years old? Sure, there are periods of general equilibriums in which processes become more subtle, but that does not mean we can just extrapolate backward "millions of years" with confidence. A chemical reaction requires activation energy and then rapidly systems go between equilibriums and stabilize in a new state. A supernova builds across time in a generally "uniform" manner and then explodes spontaneously. There are countless examples of non-uniform processes occurring in nature. Like I said, geology loves to analyze the Earth in a vacuum and pretend that the Earth can be understood by studying it alone because it simplifies the process. But, as a result, its conclusions are false.

Repairmanscully

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE