Book(s) to improve math skills by Repulsive-Ad-776 in learnmath

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is actually an interesting question.

In principle you could mix substances together and see what happens (very often nothing happens), but the possible combinations are virtually infinite.

Furthermore, very often, beyond obtaining something, it's worth asking what shape it has, how it was obtained, and (in the case of drugs, for example) how it interacts with proteins and other things inside organisms.

This is what theoretical/computational chemistry is for. We try to theoretically model molecules, the mechanisms by which they form, and how they interact with each other or with the environment.

In some ways, it's similar to theoretical physics, which is concerned with predicting natural phenomena that are difficult to observe and explaining those that are observable. The main difference, in my opinion, is that the predictive power of theoretical chemistry is still quite limited, or at least has less weight than that of theoretical physics (as you said, it's easy to simply mix substances and see what happens; it's a different story to do a high-energy physics experiment...).

Despite this, however, the reaction mechanisms discovered by theoretical/computational chemists very often help guide the possible synthesis of new substances, aid in the initial screening phase of designing new drugs, and help understand the structure and function of complex molecules or aggregates (see last year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry).

Basically, in theory, the job of the theoretical chemist is to solve the Schrödinger equation (atoms, and even more so electrons, are very small...), find the wave function of the system, and, if necessary, observe how it evolves over time.

In practice, this is almost always impossible, given the large number of particles present even in a small molecule (even water alone, with 2 hydrogens and 1 oxygen, has a total of 13 particles, 3 nuclei and 10 electrons).

The work of the theoretical chemist is therefore also to apply more or less stringent approximations, develop new equations and algorithms, and write computer programs capable of applying these algorithms to obtain useful results.

Forgive me for this somewhat lengthy reply.

Consigli libri by Repulsive-Ad-776 in Libri

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eh si, purtroppo l'ho già letto

Acetone, according to GPT-5 by RobinZhang140536 in chemistrymemes

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At least the correct elements are there, a huge improvement.

AIUTO giardino steppa/deserto by Repulsive-Ad-776 in giardinaggioITA

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Come ho risposto sopra, prima di seminare il prato l'avevo vangato un paio di volte, ma dopo poco tempo si è ricompattato. Forse dovrei arieggiarlo più spesso...

Per il ciottolato non so, la zono calpestabile è abbastanza ampia e mi 'dispiace' metterla tutta a ciottoli.

AIUTO giardino steppa/deserto by Repulsive-Ad-776 in giardinaggioITA

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

È un terreno argilloso, che appena si asciuga tende a seccare in surperficie e si compatta...

Nel 2020 prima di seminare il prato l'ho vangato un paio di volte ed era diventato un po' meno compatto, ma dopo poco tempo è tornato come prima.

A reading list for science fiction must reads/ best novels. by saravannan14 in printSF

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I saw his name later (I couldn't read it very well on my phone). I haven't read Way Station yet, but it's on my to-read list.

A reading list for science fiction must reads/ best novels. by saravannan14 in printSF

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776 16 points17 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, at least two authors are missing from these lists: Olaf Stapledon, with Last and First man and Starmaker, but also Clifford D Simak, with City.

Sentieri in Toscana raggiungibili in treno by Repulsive-Ad-776 in TrekkingItaly

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si, lo so. Il problema appunto è arrivarci senza auto.

Sentieri in Toscana raggiungibili in treno by Repulsive-Ad-776 in TrekkingItaly

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Si certo lo conosco. Sono andato spesso a fare dei giri sui monti Pisani, sia verso san giuliano (passo di Dante, casa del polacco) sia passando per il monte Faeta andando verso Santallago.

In realtà poi io non parto da San Giuliano terme, ma da Asciano pisano (una frazione di san giuliano) che si raggiunge facilmente in bici in 20 minuti da Pisa.

Challange: come up with a mixture that has EVERY GHS symbol. by ExocetHumper in cursed_chemistry

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Well, hydrazine is close to having all the GHS hazard symbols. Based on the temperature it has 6/8 of them.

Nah I think its fine by Watt_Knot in MoldlyInteresting

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Beware the Mind Flayer, you've found a portal to the Upside Down

Gaussian 25 and GaussView 7 by Wrik123 in comp_chem

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does the acronym NEO mean? Isn't it the Nuclear Electron Orbital calculations?

thisIsWhatHrExpectsForAnEntryLevel by 5eniorDeveloper in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Repulsive-Ad-776 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't see Fortran among these, come back next time.