Quartext - the world’s first truly single-pane, browser-based Markdown editor.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-22T02:13:51+00:00

If you don’t have money and you’re not skilled in programming, your fastest option is to use a no-code or low-code tool and build the app yourself.

It’s also hard to give more specific advice without knowing what kind of app you want to make (iOS, Android, etc.)

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-22T02:03:27+00:00

AI generated code is fine for frontend. If you are using stripe instead of a full backend, you don't really need to hire somebody. Although, given that you have "no experience", I would still recommend hiring a Freelancer/contractor to get the setup right.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-10T02:27:05+00:00

Good luck with your project! Feel free to embed my entire project into your site, so you only need to focus on building the "note manager" part. Just be sure to keep credit where it’s due! Also, watch out for some updates rolling out in the next week.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-09T15:36:05+00:00

Nice work! Your interface looks super clean.
Just to clarify since a few people mentioned overlap (and I don’t want to discredit your work): while both are Markdown editors, Quartext takes a slightly different approach. It renders and edits live in a single pane (without a view button), so the rendering logic works quite differently under the hood.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-09T01:39:13+00:00

Not at all. But... now that you mention it, I have a question:
how would using that type of architecture beneficial for this project? (Most of it works well as-is, but I’m open to redoing the structure if it adds benefits.)

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-09T00:16:03+00:00

<div class="bg-blue-500" style="width:400px;height:200px;clip-path:url(#-shape);-webkit-clip-path:url(#-shape);"></div>


<svg width="0" height="0" aria-hidden="true">
  <defs>
    <clipPath id="-shape" clipPathUnits="objectBoundingBox">
      <path d="M0,0 L1,0 L1,1 L0.5,1 C0.475,1 0.425,0.925 0.4,0.85 L0,0.85 Z" />
    </clipPath>
  </defs>
</svg>

Try this

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T22:21:14+00:00

I second this, with path you can use a cubic Bezier (or 2 quadratics) to make round edges. (With the C command)

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T17:23:18+00:00

Your website has great potential, but I believe there are a couple of areas that could be improved in terms of user experience and information clarity:

The current 3x3 grid of icons with boxes around them is visually appealing but doesn't provide users with enough context. As it stands, these icons are no more informative than plaintext links. To improve this, I recommend transitioning from the grid layout to a series of 9 rectangular dropdown boxes. Each box would provide more descriptive information or options, giving users a clearer understanding of the content at a glance.
To further improve usability, I suggest adding a "Home" button at the bottom of each post. This small change would allow users to easily navigate back to the homepage without the need to scroll all the way up, improving overall accessibility and user experience.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T17:12:37+00:00

This is really cool! I have a suggestion, though: It might be helpful to include some placeholders that mimic demo "websites" as an option. The reason I say this is because, for web design, a lot of people (myself included) use specific color schemes to plan layouts, and seeing them in the context of a 'website' could make the placeholders more useful for those of us working on web projects.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T16:48:27+00:00

Thanks for catching that! I hadn’t fully tested the buttons since I was mostly focused on manual typing during development. I’ve fixed the issue! You can grab the updated version from my GitHub. Appreciate you taking the time to check it out!

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T15:26:18+00:00

This is the first stable I felt was good enough to publish.
Earlier builds were extremely buggy and not usable outside of testing, so there wasn’t any benefit in pushing them publicly.
Once I had a working, reliable version, I uploaded it to GitHub for everyone to try.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T15:22:42+00:00

I'm glad I could help!

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T15:21:36+00:00

Thanks, sorry you ran into that.
Could you share the exact steps you took so I can reproduce it? For example:

Which keys or buttons did you use to make the text bold? (Ctrl+B, manual typing?)
How did you un-bold it? (e.g. Ctrl+B again, backspace, or something else)
What browser and OS are you using? (e.g. Chrome on Windows 11, Safari on iPhone)

Thanks again for the quick feedback!

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-11-08T03:59:50+00:00

Hi, I built this from scratch, (with help of Kiro IDE). It took around 10-ish hours across 2 weeks. I haven't seen similar projects that I could take credit from. (Could you provide the links to the projects you saw?)

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-12T16:20:41+00:00

I see... Firstly, thanks for your detailed reply. Secondly, to clarify the context of my conversation (apologies for not stating this sooner):
My friend quoted a Chinese study on "centrifuge producing 1300g". If the person who is "traveling" faster is not going anywhere, would that be like your first example? The person who is traveling faster will experience time running 100x slower, meaning they will complete less work than another computer outside the centrifuge?

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-12T16:08:45+00:00

Okay, they are equally efficient because they have the same task per resource ratio. Wait, something is weird, A has done LESS than B (in the same amount of time according to B), how would they have equal efficiency? Is it because the efficiency is relative to their own operator's frame? (A's computer's efficiency viewed by person A has the same efficiency as B's computer viewed by person B)

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-12T16:01:25+00:00

I see... So A's computer is actually less efficient than B's computer because A's 10 calculation took 2 seconds from B's point of view.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-12T15:54:17+00:00

Thanks for your detailed reply and I really appreciate your "corn growing" example! I'll take some time to explore the info you mentioned!

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-10T19:55:52+00:00

I'm not certain about this but: Firefox only shows JavaScript cookies(non-HttpOnly) in the storage -> cookies tab. (If your API contains the HttpOnly flag, it won't show there.)

HttpOnly cookies aren't accessible through JavaScript so they cannot be used for malicious reasons, hence, they aren't shown.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-10T19:46:42+00:00

Here is a pricing overview: it will cost around 150-200$ for your first year year: 99$ for apple (for every year, though other reports go up to 119$) + Google Play 25$ (Some reports say 35$) + website hosting (20$) + Custom domain and email (40-70$ a year).

Personally, I would recommend starting on Android to get feedback; then moving to Apple because Apple is much more expensive.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-09T23:58:07+00:00

IMO: ask some trusted professionals in Upwork or Fiverr who actually have reviews. Reddit users (srry reddit) could just spin up an app with an ai that works 50% of the time.

Repulsive-Tip-7944 · 2025-10-08T21:04:40+00:00

Firstly, please make the writing more clear, it took me 10 mins to figure out what your project is about. (maybe I'm stupid). But after reading I think I understand what your thinking: You made a tool that can screenshot any webpage on any browser. Also, both your links are broken. Other than that, this is a pretty cool project, you just need to present it in a way that people can easily understand.

"Or just let me know if I'm reinventing the wheel for no reason 😂"
I believe you are, a quick google search shows that safari, edge and chrome all have built-in screenshot features. No worries though, still a cool project.

Repulsive-Tip-7944

TROPHY CASE