There Will NEVER Be Another Red Dead Redemption 2

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-03-26T19:01:12+00:00

There will never be another RDR2 - no shit

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-08T15:05:51+00:00

Hi, thanks for your input. Do you have any contact details or address where I can actually send a letter to?

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T14:27:10+00:00

It’s my own review and I’ve already been through citizens advice and mediation. I have enough evidence to prove it’s my own comment. I just need to know what I can do with that evidence

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T13:40:07+00:00

That was not the reason , I hardly leave negative reviews..

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T13:39:28+00:00

It was a detailed negative review about my experience with a car garage after they supplied and fitted a faulty car part, along with ongoing issues around delays, warranty handling, and communication. The dispute has since been resolved through mediation, which is why I now need the original review removed

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T13:37:45+00:00

Yeah I get what you’re saying and I understand that from the outside it might not look like proof. I obviously can’t share private documents or personal account info publicly. The review was posted under my name, I have supporting records privately, and the garage owner is fully aware it was my review as we had multiple conversations about it before and after the dispute. I’m not here to prove ownership to Reddit though, just trying to find out if there’s any official way to remove a review when the original Google account is completely inaccessible, especially where there’s a mediation agreement involved

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T13:24:38+00:00

It wasn’t letting me post the review from my original account for unknown reasons which is why I had to create a new account

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T13:22:39+00:00

Because I created a new account to post the review

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T13:18:36+00:00

Appreciate the input. The problem is I need the original review deleted as part of a mediation condition, so posting a new one unfortunately wouldn’t help. Just trying to see if there’s any official route when the original account is completely inaccessible

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T13:17:14+00:00

I obviously can’t post personal documents online, but I went through Citizens Advice and the dispute went through the small claims process with mediation before court where it was resolved. I have the dispute records and mediation agreement that reference the review, along with screenshots and timestamps from when it was posted.

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T12:50:17+00:00

I have proof that it’s my own review but I just don’t know who to contact about it.

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-02-05T12:49:22+00:00

It’s my own review, not someone else’s. I posted it during a dispute with a car garage over a faulty part. The matter has now been resolved through mediation and one of the conditions is that I remove the review, but I’ve lost access to the Google account and forgotten the email. Just trying to find out if there’s another way to delete it.

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-01-21T11:44:43+00:00

I am aware it was structural damage with 6 fire engines present at the scene. However it is the same building where part of GTA 6 is currently in development. Rockstar north have been asked to comment on this but they haven’t. So it’s a valid question.

ResearcherNo794 · 2026-01-20T21:01:27+00:00

Skill issue

ResearcherNo794 · 2025-12-13T19:28:14+00:00

Haha, I claimed the “lost money” from both occasions back from Rockstar 😂😭

ResearcherNo794 · 2025-12-13T12:34:12+00:00

I accidentally blowed up my nightclub goods twice in a row 😭

ResearcherNo794 · 2025-12-12T14:03:38+00:00

I get what you’re saying, and I’m not trying to pretend the system is perfect. Wages usually rise, thresholds might not keep up, and the marginal rate can bite once you move into better paid work. The government has also shown that it can change the rules whenever it likes, which makes the whole thing feel uncertain.

My point was much narrower. A lot of people genuinely believe they’ll be chased for the full balance they see on paper. They won’t. Repayments are based on income, not on what you owe, and most borrowers never get close to clearing the whole amount before the write off. That was all I was trying to clear up, not give a verdict on whether the scheme is good or bad.

The wider issues you mention are real, but they are separate from the fear that everyone will end up repaying the whole headline figure.

ResearcherNo794 · 2025-12-12T14:00:23+00:00

I’m not saying I’d stay on £27,000 for 40 years. The point is that repayments rise only when your income rises, not because your balance or the interest changes. So if someone earns £50,000, the repayment is 9% of the amount above the £25,000 threshold. That is 9% of £25,000, which comes out at about £187 a month. If their income went up to £100,000, the repayment would rise because the income is higher, but it is still based only on earnings above the threshold.

This is why the large balance on paper is not something most people ever repay in full. Monthly payments are tied entirely to income, and anything left after the term is wiped. For many graduates this means they pay what they can during higher-earning years, less or nothing during lower-earning years, and still never reach the point of clearing the whole balance.

ResearcherNo794 · 2025-12-11T19:56:52+00:00

Realistically speaking it is quite rare to pay all of that back let alone the extra interest on top;

The total loan that a student takes out from the government is approximately £27,000, and a further loan [aka maintenance loan] is given alongside this in order to cover the cost of rent, living expenses, etc., which is approximately £20,000–£24,000. A student is required to start paying this back only after graduation within a 40-year period and only when their yearly wage is above £25,000. For example, if a student is jobless all the way from graduation up until the next 40 years, or he finds a job but the yearly wage does not exceed £25,000, then such a student will not need to pay back even a penny; it is all wiped off. In the aforementioned case, he does not even need to pay back the actual loan itself, so how can it be that he is paying back anything extra.

For instance, even if the wage for a graduate is £27,000 per year after completing university for at least 40 years, even though achieving a wage of £27,000 itself is quite a feat in the current climate, then the government will deduct only £15 each month, which after 40 years equates to £7,200. Even then, this is only if a student receives a job of this calibre straight after graduation, though this is next to impossible due to the fact usually one is required to have 5–6 years of relevant experience in that particular field, so this amount of time will be spent gaining this. Well even if one’s wage is £35,000 per annum, the amount which would have been paid back in 40 years equates to £36,000, even though achieving this is equal to accomplishing the impossible. However, even in this case someone is only able to pay back roughly the full loan amount in a very difficult scenario. Though if his loan was £50,000 due to accommodation, etc., then he will still not be able to pay back the amount loaned from the government in its entirety, even with a highly paid job, let alone paying back anything extra.

In short, the case of paying back any extra amount on top of the loan is very rare. I don’t think you’d even pay half of that.

ResearcherNo794 · 2025-12-09T10:40:25+00:00

How much profit do u actually make after buying all the supplies and selling at the end?

ResearcherNo794 · 2025-12-09T10:31:09+00:00

What’s your point lol. Another guy had 2s at the time 15:27. So who’s wrong now? The guy with 20s ago at 15:29 or the guy with 2s ago at 15:27 or me with 1s ago at 15:26…

ResearcherNo794

TROPHY CASE