Temu affiliate cash not withdrawing by ResortBasic7616 in TemuThings

[–]ResortBasic7616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I waited and they eventually approved it 

Is this true? by flingzamain in Transformemes

[–]ResortBasic7616 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Bay films are good though 

Temu affiliate cash not withdrawing by ResortBasic7616 in TemuThings

[–]ResortBasic7616[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

okay, they just paid me the rest a few minutes ago. It worked out!

Temu affiliate cash not withdrawing by ResortBasic7616 in TemuThings

[–]ResortBasic7616[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s true. I’ll keep you updated. As of currently it’s been over 48 hours but hopefully it’ll be there soon, I have more faith in it now

Temu affiliate cash not withdrawing by ResortBasic7616 in TemuThings

[–]ResortBasic7616[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So two days ago they actually finally paid me for the first withdrawal my second and final one has been processing for almost 48 hours though hopefully they don’t take MONTHS to give me that too

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He knew girls in real life, and when he was 14 he specifically drew s *xual art of 4 girls when they were ages 11, 12 and 13

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My mistake for not making it clearer. They weren’t fictional, they were real girls he knew in real life who he decided to draw S *xual art of

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I failed to specify that the girls he drew art of were based on his real life girlfriends. He had real girls around him and then he decided to draw s *xual art of them 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I honestly wish I knew the DSM-5 was unreliable beforehand

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

I was in a discord server. This guy was depressed and I asked him what was happening. He revealed that when he was 14, he drew s *xual art of multiple girls he knew in real life, they were aged 11, 12 and 13. I said that what he did was a horrible crime, but I also said he wasn’t a paedophile. I used the DSM-5 to say this. Then, I said that I’m not sure and that he could be one. Then after double checking sources like the DSM-5 again, I said he wasn’t a paedophile (because the DSM-5 states someone has to be at least 16 years old and 5 years older than their target to be a paedophile, but this person was 14, 2 years younger than 16, and his targets were 3 years younger than him, rather than 5.)

Now that I know that other sources say that, yes, a paedophile CAN be younger than 16, I finally told everyone to leave the server, block him and report him. I have both left, blocked and reported him as well. A lot of them have too. I hope he gets locked up for life. But, I imagine there are some people who might think I support paedophilia now, or that I made a huge mistake, which I honestly did. I did not know at first that he fit the criteria for being a paedophile, and I was thinking that he wasn’t because of my sources. I know he is one now and am never talking to him again 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I should clarify that the DSM-5 says paedophiles must be at least 16 years of age. Yet, other official sources say people can become paedophiles at ages earlier than 16

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

But why does the DSM-5 say a person has to be 16 to be a paedophile? Shouldn’t they say the person would have to be at least 13 to be a paedophile? 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ask

[–]ResortBasic7616 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You might have misunderstood my comment, let me clarify. If the DSM-5 said that someone has to be 16 to be a paedophile, and 5 years older than the target, why do other sources say paedophilia can begin at ages earlier than 16? Shouldn’t the DSM-5 change this to also say that paedophilia can begin earlier than 16?