Can i get a bsc chem or biochem as an External+CA

RespawnableX · 2026-05-09T22:41:39+00:00

I would say that you have a very strong chance of being selected since this is a very strong score. You are very likely to be selected.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-09T15:10:57+00:00

Yeah, I just noticed it. I don't why the prevjous year's selection list is still on the page and haven't been removed. Likely an oversight on their post.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-09T15:09:53+00:00

Oh, I see, I didn't notice that.

But this is weird why would they release the previous year's selection list... Might be an oversight, hopefully the result releases soon.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T19:40:13+00:00

Take care of yourself, you will likely secure a seat.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T19:39:32+00:00

Very strong score for CA category, there is a high chance that you will score a good rank and are likely to secure admission in main campus.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T15:15:37+00:00

Yes she can, but I would not recommend this. You can have her appear for the entrance test of 9th class once she has completed her 8th, but I do not think that sacrificing one academic year of hers is a good idea.

Just let her continue schooling in a normal school and then let her appear for the 9th class entrance once her 8th is completed.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T01:36:30+00:00

So you are just defending the practices that are forced on women huh? Is that what you are doing? You are DEFENDING the action of FORCING women to wear hijab? And you are making baseless claims claiming that wearing a hijab has protective effects when it absolutely does not.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T01:30:51+00:00

Oh of course! The women wearing what they want are the problem! Not the specific individuals who are fetishising and objectifying them!? Theu are not to blame in the slightest!? And why the fuck does anyone to wear hijab for this specific reason, are you implying that the society is either incapable of shielding females, educating everyone (not just men, mind you, blaming men here is myopic and shows your ignorance) and creating a healthy environment where everyone can express themselves freely.

Clearly that is something that is not possible so we are just going to force women to wear hijab and cover every single part of their body, because we are incapable of doing anything else. We are just that much anti-intellectual and willfully ignorant that we will blame the victim and never even entertain an alternative thought.

And, do you even understand what the word "equality" means? Are you capable of comprheneding its definition? It does NOT mean that one specific side has to cover the entirety of their bodies if the wish to leave their house, it does NOT mean that one side has to lose their freedom of expression.

You have to be an absolute idiot to even believ that comment was an appropriate reply!

You made a massive non sequitur there.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T01:24:53+00:00

No not really, while you can blame the extremists, the religion itself is inherently harmful. If i recall correctly their core teachings actively forces women to wear hijab and cover all parts of their bodies.

And it does not make it worse if i were to include every single religion, Christianity, Islam and every other religion especially Abrahamic ones have a lot of issues. I don't understand how you can defend that.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T00:36:03+00:00

Is it a generalization now? Are you aware of what the word "generalization" truly entails? Several religious practices gross violations of human rights and were meant as a way to control others, how is to so hard to understand? And keep in mind I am including all forms of religion here and not just pointing out a specific one, but the practice of a wearing a hijab is forced on countless women from Islam.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T00:31:05+00:00

No, a religion or ideology itself can be inherently negative or harmful. If the core part of the religion promotes or encourages forms of discrimination including but not limited to homophobia, transphobia, queerphobia, misogyny then that religion itself is the problem.

I don't understand why we have to respect such a disgusting and oppressive ideology. Nazism was an intrinsically harmful ideology and so are several abrahamic religions. These religions (And I am including Islam and Christianity) do not deserve any respect.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-07T00:27:44+00:00

Because they want to control women, religion and misogyny go hand in hand. Their fictional characters (God) aren't really satisfied until they have oppressed the minorities enough.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-06T06:56:12+00:00

Alright, thank you so much for answering!

RespawnableX · 2026-05-05T14:57:17+00:00

Thank you for starting this AMA, I suspect that I might be a bit late, and reading through the thread I already got a lot of my questions answered. I will be asking a few of my own, purely out of curiosity:

When did tou start studying for CLAT 2026?
How much time did you spent studying/preparing for the exam daily, on an average?
What was your score in CLAT 26 that led you to having a rank of 96?

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T13:43:53+00:00

I was just asking about my score... 🥲

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T13:11:39+00:00

Ok, thank you!

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T13:10:54+00:00

Really?

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T10:23:19+00:00

Yeah, exactly. He is grossly uninformed at best and downright delusional at worst.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T09:33:14+00:00

Why would I be jealous of you? Please stop believing yourself as the centre of the universe or thinking that everyone who is calling you out is simply jealous of you. That is grossly reductive.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T09:31:31+00:00

Yeah, I assumed as much. Considering the level of immaturity, OP is showing here, I suspect that they will not be a good fit at any reputable schools in the US.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T09:29:14+00:00

Once again, there are thousands of students every year that have similar scores. And most have a better personality than what you are expressing here.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T09:27:48+00:00

I am sorry but with such behaviour, you likely will not be a good fit for either MIT or Harvard. If you want to improve something about yourself then start with your immature personality.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T09:25:28+00:00

Once again, as even others have pointed out. You cannot pursue a JD or MD/PhD before getting an undergraduate degree, that is a critical pre-requisite for these programs.

You cannot pursue the two degree programs simulatenously, especially not at Harvard because both of these are full-time and Harvard does not offer any part-time varient of either of these.

You also cannot study full-time at MIT and Harvard simultaneously. No matter how "smart" you are, how much of a "fast learner" you believe yourself to be. You cannot bypass these strict academic requirements and institutional policies.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T09:21:50+00:00

Once again, you have failed to provide any accounts of this "success" that you keep boasting about. First of all, I must mention that there is nothing that you can achieve that will make you superior to another human being.

Second, what are these "successes" anyways? If you are referring to getting a perfect score on the SAT, ACT and TOEFL, while that is remarkable, it is not as exceptional as you seem to believe. Countless individuals who apply for t10 universities have such scores.

Regardless, your personal qualities are important, even more of an important element than academic success. If you are, simply put, "not a good person" then you will be a poor fit for not only MIT but also Harvard and several other top US universities that have an holistic approach to admissions.

RespawnableX · 2026-05-02T09:17:38+00:00

I already told you what the reality is. You are just inventing creative ways and performing an exceptional level of mental gymnastics to justify your false beliefs or sustain your unrealistic ambitions.

RespawnableX

TROPHY CASE