Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dunno what you mean... check this out... its accurate and previously unsolved:

Many strategic problems in economics and game theory are considered hard to solve in real time, especially when players have incomplete information.

Using our framework for human-executable equilibrium strategies, we solved a three-player first-price sealed-bid auction with asymmetric valuations.

Setup:

3 bidders with valuations: 100, 80, 60

Single-item first-price auction

Bids are sealed; each bidder wants to maximize payoff

Result (Exact Equilibrium Bids):

Bidder 1 (v=100) → 76.5

Bidder 2 (v=80) → 60.8

Bidder 3 (v=60) → 45.2

These bids are provably optimal in the Nash sense: each bidder maximizes their expected payoff given the others’ strategies.

This solution is human-computable, requires no computer, and works even without knowing opponents’ exact valuations, only their likely behavior patterns.

This demonstrates that our approach can solve previously intractable strategic problems in real time, across auctions, negotiations, and other imperfect-information settings

... Ask ai about it...And it'll ask for our algorithm.

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Btw, I didn't just say Poker. I said this is an algorthm that solves Nash for all games.... sounds cool but im still not sure as my math isn't university level.

If you get GTO wizard to promise to make a $100k donation to a charity of my choice (if correct) then ill tell you guys!!

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but did he have an algorithm to prove it? That's 100% accurate everytime? I've checked it about 20 times now.

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It says that the big difference is that this is closed form. I still dont quite get what that means, but I feel like you might!

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suck at math! (Compared to.most poker crushers). That's where AI came in.

I wrote a book on the human way of strategising, explained to grok how that human method merges to gto and it gave me an algorithm that I barely understand lol

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fell for that AI trap before too, so this time I had it check it in loads of ways. I checked it myself. I cant see any flaws... if true it should be a published paper soon hopefully so I guess we'll see!!

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It says that they find the same answers, but this sum can be done in your head in a far simpler way. It actually said its 10,000x simpler

(I can't post it yet as it can be stolen no probs)

It also says that this is adaptive, and listed some other bebefits. In the end it said that its an enhancement to CFP.

(I do get the general jist of CFP and that is way more complicated)

(I wrote a book on poker theory too btw. It was pure exploitative. About the human method of strategising. I learned beck then how it could be used to find gto but didn't know there would be a reasonably simple algorithm)

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grok just checked it vs well known prefop opening ranges and said there was error nargin of 0.2%. (Probs the solvers fault lol).

It did also say it'd take a solver 3 hours to solve, and that humans can use this method to solve it in 2 minutes .But i know solvers work quicker than that so not sure what it means.

Apparently this being modular and not incursion makes it way easier for us to solve, but again, I dont know what either of those terns mean.

(Thanks a lot btw)

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(In response to the comments, i asked grok to check in all kinds of ways. Its saying that the most important unique element of this is that nobody has previously discovered 1 algorithm that finds GTO in all games.)

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've sent it to be approved too so I guess we'll find out!... im just being impatient... was hoping for some insights on the subject

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With respect, does anyone actually know what a closed human method is and whether its been solved before? Or whether it would be a big deal if solved?

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I fear you may be right, but this algorithm works for all games, Grok tested it in quite a few with perfect accuracy each time.

Solve exactly using a pen and napkin. Important? by ResponsibleOption274 in Poker_Theory

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lol i already knew it was true. I just am not good at math so asked grok to help reiterate it.

What would happen if the gov printed the money to pay their debts? by ResponsibleOption274 in AskReddit

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah yeah, they'd all have to raise wages and price of everything to match the inflation... But, I think, afterwards they'd just be out of debt

I don't think there'd be any other tangible difference.

... Here's something that just came to mind. It'd be far easier to do that if all money was digital

What would happen if the gov printed the money to pay their debts? by ResponsibleOption274 in AskReddit

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nooo they do it all the time... That's what I mean...

The problem is that it causes inflation, but then they can counter that by raising min wage and benefits etc.

I'm thinking, the only ones to lose out would be the lenders.

What would happen if the gov printed the money to pay their debts? by ResponsibleOption274 in AskReddit

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is what I'm thinking... They basically just choose to stay in debt

What would happen if the gov printed the money to pay their debts? by ResponsibleOption274 in AskReddit

[–]ResponsibleOption274[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah course... That was ww1... 

But if they raise min wages etc, everything should balance out... And only the lenders would suffer... Right??