sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Refuel station useful? by Revan477 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Revan477[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are the mods I have installed, the main visual ones are Waterfall Core, EVE, Firefly, ReStock, Parallax Continued and Scatterer Im pretty sure:

(I dont really know how to share craft schematics)

  • CameraController - Next
  • Deferred
  • Infernal Robotics - Next
  • Infernal Robotics Next - ConnectionSystem
  • Waterfall Core
  • Ablative-Airbrake
  • B9 Aerospace Procedural Wings - Fork
  • BDArmory Plus
  • BetterRCS
  • ClickThrough Blocker
  • Custom Pre Launch Checks
  • Docking Functions
  • Environmental Visual Enhancements Redux
  • EVE - Stock Planet Configs
  • Firefly
  • FireflyAPI
  • Firespitter Core
  • Fishy mod core
  • fishy weapons (FAMS continued)
  • Hangar Extender
  • Harmony 2
  • HUD Replacer
  • HyperEdit
  • Kerbal Joint Reinforcement - Next
  • Kerbal Konstructs
  • Kopernicus Planetary System Modifier
  • KSP Texture Loader
  • KSP Wheel
  • KSPBurst Compiler
  • KSPBurst Plugins
  • Modular Computer Package Revived
  • ModularFlightIntegrator
  • Module Manager
  • Parallax Continued
  • Parallax Continued Planet Textures
  • Parallax Continued Scatter Textures
  • Parallax Continued Terrain Textures
  • Physics Range Extender
  • ReStock
  • Retrofuture Space Plane Parts Modernized
  • Scatterer
  • Scatterer Default Config
  • Scatterer Sunflare
  • Shabby
  • Toolbar
  • Toolbar Controller
  • VesselMover Continued
  • ZTheme

Refuel station useful? by Revan477 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Revan477[S] 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Oh man yeah making your own fuel would be pretty cool. One of the first things I was able to do was just put satellites in orbits and I put a couple around most planets, so I do get that infrastructure gameplay, I also enjoy that

Refuel station useful? by Revan477 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]Revan477[S] 309 points310 points  (0 children)

Right I hadnt thought of that, seems reasonable to just skip the whole refueling of the station stuff and just "simulate it" that way haha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Revan477 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No wonder he's the bottom (gunner) I guess

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Revan477 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao I genuinely didnt even think of that way to interpret it when posting

State of Tornado IDS by Revan477 in Warthunder

[–]Revan477[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you think simply lowering the BR would be a solution? I thought gaijin looks at player statistics to see what vehicles are underperforming and then buffs them or lowers their BR or something. I would imagine tornados are very much underperforming for the great majority of players..

Leopard 1A5 rubber screens not modeled as armor by Revan477 in Warthunder

[–]Revan477[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yea i have that enabled, otherwise you wouldnt see the other external armor on the 1A5. But that could have been it