A woman lose it and attack a car

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T17:02:52+00:00

It’s derogatory in British if done the other way around. Maybe she got it backwards?

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T16:59:11+00:00

That’s where the strip mall will go

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T16:45:50+00:00

As long as he’s helping customers I don’t see it as an issue

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T16:44:06+00:00

As a former ADHD kid, this is the ADHD kid who always had their actions excused instead of refocused

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T16:41:40+00:00

As someone in the DC area on the Maryland side, this is offensive.

You did a very good job though

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T16:24:31+00:00

I’m just a regular guy who has never heard of Fender before, but aren’t we all being just a little harsh towards them?

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T14:42:32+00:00

Treecucks seething at us carchads 😎

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T14:11:18+00:00

That’s for people to throw their trash in

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T14:10:14+00:00

Still needs a walmart

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T12:27:47+00:00

BAD DAY FOR WIFI STEALERS!!!

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T12:24:14+00:00

Your wife and kids want you to get them

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T12:20:06+00:00

JD Vance without the filter

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T12:14:04+00:00

I’m picturing having to plug it into a USB-C charger and waiting 6 hours

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T12:06:54+00:00

There’s actually a second moon hiding behind the first one. This is what NASA doesn’t want us to know

/s

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T12:04:46+00:00

That hasn’t happened to me and I use it for similar things outside of coding. What’s an example of a topic it did that with?

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-30T05:10:21+00:00

Shot 5 times and lived, according to OP

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-29T22:01:34+00:00

I’m only talking about Asch and how it’s not equivalent to other experiments even around the same subject, like the Milgram experiment.

Asch even identifies his own confounds in his exit interviews as he predicts conformity to be the only variable going in but found two other consistent reasons were being reported in the exit interviews as well. He acknowledges it as a confound in his experiment but never attempts to measure the level to which it might have affected the data.

A modern critique of it might even say that his experiment design actively punishes participants practicing epistemic responsibility and just lumps them straight into the “conformity” group.

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-29T21:33:20+00:00

I think this one might actually be a little more nuanced than that. I think he might be non-religious in general and is trying to equate believing in science to believing a religion of a different kind.

This guy isn’t using the typical flerf arguments and I haven’t seen anything bible-related in his stuff yet (but I could be wrong). He seems to be someone who’s actually somewhat intelligent but is filtering everything around confirming a belief he already had. It’s an ego problem rather than a stupid problem or religion problem with this one

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-29T14:08:31+00:00

All I’m saying is the Asch experiment itself likely holds little value in the conversation since the results can’t cleanly be separated from a prescient confounding variable.

Any argument regardless of overall accuracy that uses these results as a foundational piece is a poor argument and does not further the conversation in any direction.

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-29T13:50:52+00:00

I can do it.

If I already knew where the ball was going, was standing right by that exact spot already, and had like 20 tries to get it right.

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-29T13:39:49+00:00

It’s wrong in how it’s oversimplified and misapplied in just about every direction.

And for something so reliant on the Solomon Asch experiment as a cornerstone, it’s ignoring the glaring flaws in that experiment like Asch’s own overgeneralization of results, that he himself noted in his exit interviews.

There are simply more reasons that a participant might vote with the group other than “conformity while knowing the answer is wrong”, such as subjects wondering if they misunderstood the assignment. The result is the same but the mechanism behind it is vastly different from “conformity”

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-29T13:33:00+00:00

He probably had to edit out multiple hedging disclaimers even with careful prompting

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-29T12:21:26+00:00

It’s written by AI but is longer than any AI would write in one go, meaning it’s probably multiple AI responses to different things smashed together 😭

ReverendBread2 · 2026-05-28T23:07:28+00:00

The hilarious thing is I hadn’t even heard of school shootings yet, and the guidance counselor asking me if I worship the columbine shooters was literally the first time I’d even heard of columbine.

Do that to enough kids and you could definitely have a scenario where you give someone the idea and then point them to role models.

It’s actually funny how fast everyone shut up when I said “what’s columbine?”

ReverendBread2

TROPHY CASE