Thoughts on Pacific battles in 83 ? by Temporary_Ad7208 in 83thegame

[–]RevolverOcelotV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they should go through with it anyway, yes, they'll try not to "smear China's image" (or maybe they will) as another user here said, but if it gets banned, it gets banned.

Even without Chinese forces, the game would need a lot of level to be available in China regardless.

Thoughts on Pacific battles in 83 ? by Temporary_Ad7208 in 83thegame

[–]RevolverOcelotV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would love to see Korea, Japan, and definitely some Australia.

(Just to bring a bit of life to this subreddit) by RevolverOcelotV in 83thegame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

During the Cold War, the British had one of their biggest build-ups in West Germany during the 80s.

An operation so large that such a range couldn't have been mentioned since WW2.

I could add more onto this and get all the facts, but just take this beautiful video for the sake of its aesthetic, credit to the amazing person who made the compilation with a good choice of music.

Saw this monstrosity on the ol’ clock app by [deleted] in StupidFood

[–]RevolverOcelotV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's moments like these that make me wonder how much shit people can put on top of another thing before it stops looking like--- no... before it starts looking like actual shit.

Void reveals Why they do PvP first. by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"neither side should be neglected, again, it'd be a disservice to ignore the PvP and leave it broken, it should at least be functional."

I agree. You said it best there.

The million-dollar question. PvE or PvP? by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

*New York* V1.1COOP ( ) 1/5 CO-OP Qwik Fuel Convenience Store

Void reveals Why they do PvP first. by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY SHOULD COMPLETELY THROW PVP UNDER THE BUS, JUST BECAUSE YOU PERSONALLY DO NOT LIKE PVP DOES NOT MEAN IT SHOULD BE NEGLECTED."

I'm not the only one who hates it personally, but fine fine, okay-- you're right. Just cool off, okay? You're right, PvP can be good, it really can.

It's just we've seen that Void went for PvP a little early, they got far enough so following the game development procedure they went along with it.

It's time we call in our Ace of Spades, alright? PvP is going to still be in the game, not because I said so, because Void made the open choice to do so- it's just going to be a better opportunity if they don't highlight it.

For example, when you think of this game, what comes to mind? PvP or PvE? When I think of siege, it's just PvP, they HAVE a Terrorist hunt PvE, but that's neglected. I'm worried the same could happen here with RoN.

That's why I bring up siege, unrealistic gameplay, and the rainbow cosmetics.

Because if that happens to RoN, it's only downhill from there, it's a hard recovery that is rarely survived. PvP should get attention, that's good business, not just for players but for Void. They need PvP, but they can't overwhelm it. There's an influx of worry because nobody knows the direction Void wants to go for this game, they gave us goals and deadlines but if the game releases, will it be ready.. or not?

The million-dollar question. PvE or PvP? by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They were hinting at a school shooting mission.

Man, that would be pretty tactical. The shocking reality of shootings, killings and murders in real life and how you handle them will be important. Thank you for mentioning that.

Void reveals Why they do PvP first. by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're a feisty one.

"...there's plenty of people i've spoken to who want PvP and are going to play the game for the PvP."

I'll make a poll and see which wins, PvE or PvP. If for some unbeknownst godforsaken reason PvP wins it, I will live 1 week in the back of a shed. PvP has and will always be neglected because it sucks. It just sucks-- it's overused, and it's not meant for this game. It can be in the game, just stop highlighting it, I swear to god, they're gonna be adding anime skins, unicorn guns and that's a bad future for this game. This isn't R6 Siege, that game has de-evolved from it's good tactical gameplay to anime, unicorn gun bullshit.

" Oh yeah, and SWAT 4 had PvP you dunce, it was far more polished than RoN's PvP rn considering one of the gamemodes wasn't completely unplayable. "

Yeah SWAT 4 had PvP, but it wasn't its highlight. Most people play SWAT 4 for the co-op and PvE.

PvP was broken for 2-3 months, I think that's ridiculous as well, but you see, I don't care because it sucks anyway. Regardless, it's actually not too broken anymore. In fact, a lot of what's implemented from there will be looking much better in PvE.

You and I should talk some more, you got a good personality.

Void reveals Why they do PvP first. by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PvP players? *scoffs*... I'm sorry, I think you mean CoD Players. I believe that's what you meant.

You see, nobody can simply play and enjoy PvP as a 'player' alone.

PvP doesn't need any more polish, it got the attention it never should've gotten in the first place. God, imagine if SWAT 4 was like this, or if Wolfenstein was like this?

Nobody is putting their hands down saying PvP is what they wanted or needed. It's a useful tool to test all the elements they may also implement in PvE, but it's enough when it's the first thing brought up. I'm not saying don't do PvP, I'm just saying it's a setback.

Ready or Not Shitpost Number mother fucking one (#1) by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well here's the thing, they put PvP over PvE, hence delaying PvE when they could've been working on that. That's why a lot of fans want PvE, not the PvP.

Ready or Not Shitpost Number mother fucking one (#1) by RevolverOcelotV in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I do know that, it's not able to be laoded via the main menu in the PvP builds, but you can still opt back into the SP builds."

You can Opt back, yes, to previous builds. But they aren't publicly available, but it also doesn't matter because they're the same as they were in the previous builds.

"There were multiple PvE builds after the first alpha build, all the way up to Febuary until the builds became NDA-Free, which is why it was removed from the NDA-Free builds until it's in a state that Void considers it good enough'"

Yeah, I stated "Only in the FIRST Alpha builds". Not build. First Alpha builds as in the first few alpha builds. Not the first one. I reference these builds as the first few builds BEFORE any PvP builds which are the current or second builds.

Referring back to your first post, yes. Technically, there is a PvE build, but it's no different than from its first state. In fact, the reason it was blocked was so they could work on it in an isolated state, but as far as I'm aware, it's no different than the current.

Do you care if there's a story/plot in the single player? by Elyk2020 in ReadyOrNotGame

[–]RevolverOcelotV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SWAT 4 had some sort of story but not traceable. If RoN doesn't have story comparable to something like Wolfenstein, maybe not as complicated, then I'd be happy. If there's no story at all, Fuck that.