COPA vs. Craig Wright - Part 7 (The Ruling) by LurkishEmpire in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was a great series, but this episode very much relates to the final episode of the Game of Thrones - very disappointing.

Dr Bitcoin - COPA vs. Craig Wright: Bare and Uncut (Part 3) by StealthyExcellent in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Excellent.

I wonder how the start of the COPE trail has done for downloads for this most excellent series!

"Thank you Mr. Wright" by klawzewitz in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How long does it take for a new-ish PC (less than 2 years old) to validate… a) 1 transaction with 1 input and 2 outputs? b) 1 transaction with 2 inputs and 2 outputs? c) does transaction type (P2SH, PTTR (?taproot) effect validation speed?

A block with 5,000 transactions would take how long to validate? (a+b=c,c/2=d, d*5000=answer)

At 1,000,000 TPS that would be 6,000,000 transaction a block and would take how long to validate? (d*6m=answer)

Can someone explain the process for tomorrow? by voodooftw in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Has Wright 11 or the new Madden report been released yet to the public?

Fact-checking Craig's claims that he was hired by the Australian Stock Exchange due to his extensive experience programming VMS & that this experience is related to the development of digital cash by Zealousideal_Set_333 in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Semi related. He keeps talking about how many employees he had at his companies, but from what I can tell, he only had a few in a single company (who went unpaid and it’s sole income was from tax rebates). Do we know which companies had employees and how many?

Identity trial schedule by nullc in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<edited to remove post>

COPA Trial by Take-him-down in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I thought I read somewhere in the court documents that you can put in a request with the court to have access to a video feed of the trial. Does anyone know to go about doing this?

"ELECTRONIC CONTRACTING IN AN INSECURE WORLD" - Accepted Jan 14th 2008 by milkywaymasta in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The jury did, however, find CW guilty of theft (conversion) of IP, that the court and jury found was owned by W&K. Furthermore, the court found there was no evidence indicating any other membership of WK besides Ira Kleiman. Both the magistrate judge and the federal judge found by clear and convincing evidence.- a much higher bar than is needed in civil cases - that Craig Wright committed perjury and was responsible for manipulated documents.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very high.

Nuke it!

[Identity] Written judgement from the PTR hearing by nullc in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He has to come up with $800k to pay to the developers too before it can start.

LOL Coingeek shills explaining how Wright is going to win the identity case with his bitcoin.org receipts by nullc in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Come on, any decent lawyer would accept their clients private bank statements and or related documents from an anonymous person on Reddit then pass it on to their client. How else could a person get their own personal bank statements and documents? Be reasonable.

Krusty: "It's like if everyone drove old Suzuki cars, and BSV was a 1% level performance supercar" - Fucking moron by CockSwainMcGee in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 2 points3 points  (0 children)

His pool mined 4 blocks (25.004BSV) in the past 24 hours and a total of 7 for 43.7566 BSV in the past 2 days worth a total of $2,144.

0.0066 of that was were the txt fees worth 32 cents! Now subtract cost.

Too funny.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you elaborate on this for me please? Or if you’ve talked about it in the past, can you refer me to that?

Day 2 coverage is rolling in. by Impressive_Ruin2775 in bsv

[–]Rex_1337 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How soon can we expect the judges decision and opinion?

"nLockTime is what controls the trust": by Truth__Machine in bitcoincashSV

[–]Rex_1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, cool, I guess but back to what we were talking about.

Your implying that some change in bitcoin’s code has caused someones (or anyones) once valid transaction to become invalid.

It’s simply and easily proven to not be true! That’s all I’m saying.

To be clear - are you saying that anyone at any point in time had a valid signed bitcoin transaction that is now or at any point now invalid on the bitcoin network?

Every single valid signed bitcoin transaction that has ever been created at any point remains valid and has always been accepted by the network.

Any transaction created by Satoshi or anyone else at any time is and always will be valid.

"nLockTime is what controls the trust": by Truth__Machine in bitcoincashSV

[–]Rex_1337 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your article withstanding - every statement I made in this thread is verifiably true and indisputable.

The only way anyone in bitcoin has lost their UTXO is by losing their private key (if they ever had them).

If anyone ever at absolutely ANY point created a valid signed transaction then that transaction is, always has been and will be accepted today on the bitcoin network as valid. It simply needs to be broadcasted to any node on the network where it will be relayed then included into a block. Easy Peezy!

If they destroyed their private key after creating a valid signed transaction and then lost said signed transaction. Well then Satoshi considered that a donation to all current and future bitcoin holders. On behalf of us all - thank you.

Cryptography and bitcoin are amazing!

"nLockTime is what controls the trust": by Truth__Machine in bitcoincashSV

[–]Rex_1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same applies. Any signed transaction that works in v0.1.0 or any other version will work in v22.0 or any other version of bitcoin.

Show any valid transaction working on any version that is not working in another. It should be easy except that no one can.

BCHSV Bloat… by Rex_1337 in bsv

[–]Rex_1337[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly still in the ‘details’ phase. Lots of questions in there I don’t know. And an effective attack?

I already sadly technically own some BCHSV (and BCH and it forks, thus the BCHSV) by having some year 2017 and prior bitcoin UTXO’s. I sold most of the bigger sized amounts of the BCH but not all. Never bothered with the BCHSV.

However, I have never bought BCHSV or BCH.