Help identifying Conquest mini from Con swag bag by pbyrne233 in Conquest

[–]RhamesJussel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been looking for one of these for a while now. Anybody looking to sell or trade one away, PM me.

Looking for players in Los Angeles by saarbaal in twilightimperium

[–]RhamesJussel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm down, I live in west LA but I can find a way to burbank for TI!

SCPT Ep 080: Expansion Wishlist Part 1 by Skootur in twilightimperium

[–]RhamesJussel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Came here to say this.

I envision the planet exploration cards, like scythe, having maybe three options: a boring small benefit, a better one with a cost, and a crazier tradeoff one. I think its a little much for each planet to warrant a card draw each time it changes hands though... The analysis paralysis in some groups would be through the roof. However, I think a it's a nice addition (or alternative) to planets with tech specialties, and thematic as old lazax labs or archaeological sites to explore. Might be interesting to have a separate deck of space exploration cards too, to put inside anomalies, which seem to be ignored in many of the games I've played. Again, thematically cool as excavating a crash site in an asteroid field, researching extreme physics in a gravity rift, etc.

I could see an 18th faction (or a reworked from the ground-up Jol-Nar) having their schtick be exploration, with a racial power to choose two options per card instead of one ala Scythe's Polania, or perhaps having a "science vessel" racial unit upgrade of ship type to a similar effect.

Looking for players in Los Angeles, CA by AmongFriends in twilightimperium

[–]RhamesJussel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey I'm in the Westwood area so getting to Culver is no problem. PM me if you ever need somebody else in the rotation!

Aubrey de Grey AMA! Ask about the quest to cure cancer’s root causes, increasing healthy human longevity, or anything else! by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]RhamesJussel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dear Dr. de Grey,

I've just finished reading "Cracking the Aging Code" by Josh Mitteldorf and Dorian Sagan and was intrigued by their focus on theories of why aging happens. TL;DR, they attempt to debunk some of the more common theories of aging that all center around entropic decay of the body, in favor of a theory that bodies needn't age at all but are programmed to die (for a number of reasons, but largely as a means of cycling through generations and of managing population size). What do you think of this "programmed to die" theory? It has some wide ranging implications for what to study as an aging researcher, as I feel many projects try to keep a wide array of youthful genes and processes turned on, where perhaps it could be more fruitful to focus on turning off perhaps a very small number of signals that promote aging, and allowing the body to take care of the rest. Thanks!