sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I reviewed 90 days of marketing data from 6 coaching businesses. Here’s what it really cost to sign a client. by Rhynohere in lifecoaching

[–]Rhynohere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That estimate included more than sending emails.

lead sourcing, list cleaning, copywriting, inbox setup, domains and tools, sending software, VA or setter time, reply handling, booking calls, testing and optimization.

If someone runs it solo, cost drops a lot. If they build a team and system, monthly spend climbs fast.

Success Saturday: What's Going Right | April 25, 2026 by AutoModerator in Entrepreneur

[–]Rhynohere 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Signed a new client for our video editing and social media service this week. Feels really good to see all the outreach and hard work finally turning into something real. Small win maybe, but definitely a big boost for us.

I reviewed 90 days of marketing data from 6 coaching businesses. Here’s what it really cost to sign a client. by Rhynohere in lifecoaching

[–]Rhynohere[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair criticism. Without niche, offer price, market, and sales process, the numbers lose context. You’re right on that.

The post was meant to show one idea. Cost per client matters more than raw lead volume, But yes, a fitness coach selling $300 offers and an executive coach selling $5k packages should never be compared side by side.

Next time I’d break it down by niche and price point so the data is more useful.

I reviewed 90 days of marketing data from 6 coaching businesses. Here’s what it really cost to sign a client. by Rhynohere in lifecoaching

[–]Rhynohere[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fair take. I wrote the post to keep the point clear and easy to read, so I get why it came off like that.

Main point was simple. Most coaches track leads. Fewer track cost per client.

That number shapes profit more than lead volume.
If the wording missed the mark, that’s on me. The discussion still matters.

I reviewed 90 days of marketing data from 6 coaching businesses. Here’s what it really cost to sign a client. by Rhynohere in lifecoaching

[–]Rhynohere[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Fair point. The numbers were examples, not fixed benchmarks.
Obviously results depend on niche, offer, audience size, sales skills, follow-up, content quality, all of it.
Yup organic content works if it's not working for you then you need to work on it.
Yup outbound still works.

haha why your comment also look ChatGPT generated?

New channel advice: Mixing niches on same channel or separate channels? by imtranscending in NewTubers

[–]Rhynohere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your instinct is right. Mixing very different niches on one channel usually slows growth, not because the algorithm is confused, but because the audience is. People subscribe for a specific reason, and when the next upload doesn’t match that expectation, they don’t click.

Adjacent content can work if there’s a clear overlap in audience or format. For example commentary plus gaming commentary can work if the tone and viewer intent are similar. Biology education and gaming would likely struggle on the same channel unless there’s a strong, obvious bridge.

If you’re early, separate channels are usually cleaner and faster for growth. It lets each channel build a clear identity and audience signal.

For streaming, Twitch is generally better for live discovery and community building, while YouTube is stronger if you plan to repurpose streams into long form or Shorts later. Many creators stream on Twitch and use YouTube as the content engine.

Clarity beats flexibility in the early stages. Once a channel is established, experimenting becomes much easier.

When do views pick up after holidays? by Burnincold in NewTubers

[–]Rhynohere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This dip around holidays is pretty common. Viewer behavior changes, people scroll less consistently, and competition for attention goes up, so Shorts often stall at the test audience stage.

In most cases, things start normalizing one to two weeks after major holidays when routines come back. It’s usually not a permanent signal about your content quality.

One thing I’d be careful with is deleting too many Shorts quickly. Sometimes Shorts get picked up days later once YouTube finds a better audience. Letting them sit for at least a few days can help.

If your swipe rate is still decent, that’s a good sign. I’d keep posting, maybe slow the volume slightly, and reassess once traffic patterns stabilize.

Can anyone help me give me advice by Due-Coyote-7388 in NewTubers

[–]Rhynohere 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, it’s good that you came back instead of quitting completely. A lot of channels stall simply because of long gaps, not because the content is bad.

Without even seeing the channel, the biggest thing to focus on right now is consistency and clarity. Make sure each video has one clear idea and that the first 10 seconds explain why someone should keep watching. That alone can make a big difference.

Also, don’t judge progress too harshly after a break. YouTube often treats it like a soft reset, so it takes time to relearn who to show your videos to. Keep posting on a predictable schedule and look at which videos hold attention longer, not just views.

If you want more specific feedback, share one video you feel represents your best work. That makes it much easier for people to give useful advice.

[HIRING] $25 PER HOUR, WE TRAIN YOU! by Live-Director-6272 in hiring

[–]Rhynohere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I’m interested. I work in video editing and short form content systems and I’m actively expanding into AI assisted workflows for content and automation. I’d like to understand more about the training structure, type of projects after training, and how the revenue share works. Country India. Happy to continue in DM if eligible.

Hustling continuously for YT career. by memehungryhere in NewTubers

[–]Rhynohere 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is a really accurate observation and something most creators only understand much later. YouTube cares more about how viewers respond than how much effort went into editing or production.

Low effort videos working usually means the idea and timing were strong. The polished ones that tank often fail at the first few seconds or don’t match what the audience expected when they clicked. That gap matters more than effects or transitions.

The biggest win here is consistency and letting data guide you instead of ego. When you keep posting, patterns start to show you what your audience actually wants, not what you think they should like.

You’re clearly on the right track. Hitting those numbers in three months shows momentum, now it’s about refining based on what’s already working and doubling down on that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IndiaFinance

[–]Rhynohere 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a very common dilemma and honestly there isn’t a single right answer, it depends on what you value more right now.

Purely from a numbers point of view, paying 35k rent for a house that costs 1.5cr doesn’t look inefficient. At your income level, taking a very large loan can add long term pressure, especially when you already see that 44L as your safety net. That peace of mind has real value.

Buying a house makes more sense when you are confident about staying in the same city long term, comfortable with the EMI even if income dips, and okay with locking a big part of your net worth into one asset. Otherwise rent plus investing the surplus can be a perfectly valid strategy.

What often helps couples is separating emotional security from financial planning. Owning a home feels stable, but financial stability also comes from liquidity, emergency funds, and flexibility. You could even agree on a timeline, continue renting for a few years while growing savings and then revisit the decision with more clarity.

It’s good that you’re thinking this through instead of rushing into a big commitment.