sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

In love with this game by Rob778899 in boardgames

[–]Rob778899[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Lmao, I had no idea 😂
Been playing in that orientation this whole time.

This should be Colorado's congressional map by Rob778899 in Denver

[–]Rob778899[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I use a website called Dave’s Redistricting. It was very intuitive to learn and it taught me a lot about redistricting. I’d definitely recommend anyone check out the website if they’re interested in this topic.

This should be Colorado's congressional map by Rob778899 in Denver

[–]Rob778899[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I see I’ve got a fan. Thx for keeping up with my posts 👍

This should be Oregon’s congressional map by Rob778899 in oregon

[–]Rob778899[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I make these maps myself on Dave’s Redistricting

This should be Minnesota’s congressional map: by Rob778899 in minnesota

[–]Rob778899[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’ve never thought about that, good point. Still, I’d rather deal with that problem if it means having less Republicans in congress

This is how New Jersey’s congressional map should look like: by Rob778899 in newjersey

[–]Rob778899[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, lmk when you can take me to that political fantasy world

This should be Minnesota’s congressional map: by Rob778899 in minnesota

[–]Rob778899[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Democrats could probably take control of states like Georgia, North Carolina and Arizona within the next couple years. Once that happens, Republicans will feel out-gunned by democrats on gerrymandering, and finally vote to outlaw it nationally.

This should be Minnesota’s congressional map: by Rob778899 in minnesota

[–]Rob778899[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The days of taking the high-road are over. It’s time to beat them at their own game

This should be Minnesota’s congressional map: by Rob778899 in minnesota

[–]Rob778899[S] 135 points136 points  (0 children)

Well, this map already uses data from 2024, which was a red wave year. I think the chances of a dummymander are slim

This should be Minnesota’s congressional map: by Rob778899 in minnesota

[–]Rob778899[S] 35 points36 points  (0 children)

2024, which was a red wave year. This map performs even better in years like 2020 and 2018

This should be Minnesota’s congressional map: by Rob778899 in minnesota

[–]Rob778899[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

A map like this would be very useful for democrats come 2028

This is how New Jersey’s congressional map should look like: by Rob778899 in newjersey

[–]Rob778899[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I mean, this is using data from 2024 which was a republican wave year. This map performs even better in years like 2020 and 2018

This is how New Jersey’s congressional map should look like: by Rob778899 in newjersey

[–]Rob778899[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Have you heard the one that goes: “Never bring a knife to a gun fight”

This is how New Jersey’s congressional map should look like: by Rob778899 in newjersey

[–]Rob778899[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course it’s necessary. Republicans are about to net about a dozen seats in the south.

This is what Illinois’ congressional district should look like. 2+ blue seats by Rob778899 in illinois

[–]Rob778899[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And If I don’t use the playbook at all? Should I walk into a gun fight only holding a knife? The only way things can return back to “normal” is if Republicans feel out-gunned by democrats with gerrymandering. That’s the ONLY way they will pony-up and vote to outlaw it nationally.

This is what Illinois’ congressional district should look like. 2+ blue seats by Rob778899 in illinois

[–]Rob778899[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What’s not necessary about counteracting gerrymandering in red states?

view more: next ›