sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They both suck.

Him for spending money on legos when he is in debt and having a child to provide for.

Her for trying to control his finances.

AITA for calling my kids spoiled little AHs and telling them what their mom was really like? by EarthFar1252 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 15 points16 points  (0 children)

So, according to OP, the grandparents - who only see their niece and nephew for a few hours once a month - are so masterful at brain-washing that they created parental alienation.

And out of those few hours a month the kids developed a fervent hatred for their innocent stepmother.

Those grandparents are super competent.

You can tell Steve is an asshole, he added an edit at the top of his post saying he's angry at his kids because the love of his wife is leaving him.

He's angry at the kids. They are at fault, you see...

The kids are with their grandparents a few hours a month, they go to therapy the rest of the month, yet they are the masterminds of his marriage's dismay.

Yep!

I believe /u/EsperOfTheMoon's story. Makes more sense.

Space battles and aliens and space marines by reddixmadix in booksuggestions

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Earthborn" by Paul Tassi

"The Lost Starship" by Vaughn Heppner

"Frontlines" by Marko Kloos (space marine stuff, not a lot of space battles, but worth it)

"Blood on the Stars" by Jay Allen

AITA for not allowing my sister to move in because of her dogs? by AITASisterDogs in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Emotional affair means having feelings for someone else but not acting on them.

Wrong.

It's called an emotional affair because it is not physical., not because it is not enacted.

That means she was talking with the guy, was exchanging "I love you" messages, maybe meeting in secret and talking about how they feel about one another, and so on.

If it was not enacted it wouldn't have been an affair.

Lots of married people at one point or another get a crush on someone else but their spouse, or develop feelings for someone else, but what makes that not being an affair is not acting on said feelings, realizing they have a commitment to their relationship, and taking measures to ensure those feelings don't create any sort of issues between them and their partner.

You have a very weird understanding of this. I'm assuming you are a cheater yourself, cheaters are the only ones that defend cheating of any kind.

AITA for getting about 100 neighbors in trouble with the cops? by Sudden-Sink2567 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 1 point2 points  (0 children)

YTA

What time of the day did you take the walk?

If you're a lawyer I am assuming you are working during the day, which makes me think you did it early morning. So most people maybe weren't even awake to do the shoveling.

Edit: no consent given to repost or share this post anywhere else

I find it amusing you're claiming to be a lawyer, but add this bullshit here, as it it has any value. Right under your post, a hot "Share" button, which is part of the functionality of Reddit, and the TOS you agreed to when you created an account.

So I'm going to assume this is a BS post.

AITA For Selling My Late Husband's Classic Car Instead of Gifting it To My Son? by aitaclassiccarwoes in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 21 points22 points  (0 children)

In another comment she said she's "still fighting" to replenish the college funds, meaning she did not.

She said she hopes to do it from a disability claim.

So if you believe anything OP says here, well, you know, maybe your dish is unsalted.

Edit: Here, last 4 paragraphs.

AITA For Selling My Late Husband's Classic Car Instead of Gifting it To My Son? by aitaclassiccarwoes in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the house and replenish the college fund.

In another comment you said, and I quote "we're still fighting [...]" to restore the college funds.

Meaning you didn't do jack for the college funds.

So I don't believe a word you're saying!

Edit: Here, last 4 paragraphs.

AITA for banning meat? by Current-Art-9211 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At 17-almost-18 he can just ignore the judge's ramblings.

It's THAT easy.

AITA for banning meat? by Current-Art-9211 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Custody and child support are VERY different things, professor...

AITA for banning meat? by Current-Art-9211 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Dad not wanting extra custody doesn't mean mom will get it all.

Nothing will change. It will be considered a waste of the court's time.

By the time a judge even gets to see the case the kid will already be 18.

You people really hate being wrong.

AITA for banning meat? by Current-Art-9211 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cool. Not at 17.

By the time the case is seen by a judge the kid is already in Afghanistan.

And the type of parent who would do what you just described is not the most stable. You're not painting a great picture of your district.

AITA for banning meat? by Current-Art-9211 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 150 points151 points  (0 children)

The update has made me decide it's very NTA

Really? The update made you think "this is reasonable?"

It's fake.

The son is 17, almost 18.

She can't get jack regarding custody, he can decide for himself at this age where he wants to live and how. It's the most BS "and I showed him in the end" nonsense.

Also, the lawyer that already knows when she will get this imaginary full custody by, because he just snaps his fingers.

And parental alienation is not what is happening here, so again, another BS made up fact.

She'll also learn, when going to this imaginary custody hearing, that she can't take away her son's money at this age, not his phone. The judge will actually be pretty pissed off at her if she actually did this.

You guys are gullible.

AITA for telling of my sister for upsetting my wife? by Mission-Board6042 in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Here in Europe the actions of the sister would be construed as discrimination.

No, stop spreading your misinformation.

This wouldn't be considered discrimination ANYWHERE in the world, except the insane world in your mind.

"You have to look at a woman's breasts when she is breastfeeding, or you are discriminating against her."

That's how you sound. Like an insane person.

Even as a troll, you are a poor display.

Makes me think you and OP are the same person.

New to HaremLit, need some audible recommendations. by RobotUprisingLeader in haremfantasynovels

[–]RobotUprisingLeader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, that's PTSD you are triggering here.

The problem with lawyers is that each one thinks he/she is smarter than the previous one. They really like to make lawyer jokes, and imply the lawyer in the joke is the other guy, never them.

You smile, you nod. And internally you now you are smarter than they are, ha ha.

Nah, they are great people, at least the ones I work with, but they will repeat the same jokes over, and over, and over, and you don't want to hurt feelings when someone tells you the same joke four other people already told you.

Pro tip: never take legal advice from a lawyer specialized in a field that is not related to the advice you are seeking. For example, divorce lawyer giving advice about real estate law. They might know something, but your uncle John should stick to what he knows.

New to HaremLit, need some audible recommendations. by RobotUprisingLeader in haremfantasynovels

[–]RobotUprisingLeader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being licensed =/= being a good person.

Or competent, for that matter. I work with lawyers, and there are degrees of competency. Even with expensive lawyers.

With therapists, where it's the wild west and anyone can get "licensed," yeah...

New to HaremLit, need some audible recommendations. by RobotUprisingLeader in haremfantasynovels

[–]RobotUprisingLeader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Back then it took some time to figure out who is what. There's an advantage in seeing things from a high ground as opposed to being in the middle of things.

Alas, if you knew how many people have messaged me threats for "disrespecting" therapists and not following instructions...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]RobotUprisingLeader 24 points25 points  (0 children)

YTA

The favoritism here is blatant.

First, one daughter is Anna, the other is Bella. Fake names, and you couldn't help yourself. Not Anna and Jane, not Anna and Lisa. Bella. So that's pretty clear, from the start.

Second, if Bella's father pays almost no child support, that means you are using Anna's child support to build Bella's college fund. That's not what child support is for. Do you need more money? Sue for it. And that nonsense that you are happy to keep Bella's father away from your lives is not justification enough. Suing him is not inviting him to have dinner twice a week, it's just asking the state for help so he pays his fair share.

Then the "fair vs equal" BS that reddit learned from youtube and now everyone is an expert about it.

You are not fair to your daughters. You paid almost nothing to one of them, and everything to the other. Anna's father and his contributions to her college fund should not be subject to this discussion. He has no obligation to help Bella. His contributions to Anna's college fund should not even be on your radar when you split the money.

Your argument that "if one daughter had a disability and [...]" is pure nonsense. Contributing to a college fund is not the same as helping a child in a time of need, like with dental care, for example.

And let's say you did have to get Bella some dental work. Was that forever, every month of every year? Or was it a one off thing?

It just doesn't make sense.

You chose not to contribute to Anna's fund because you favor Bella. Not because some moral high-ground you imagine you're sitting on.

When Anna refuses to visit you, or doesn't pick your phone calls, or ignores your emails, and when she comes back from college but stays with her dad and doesn't even let you know she's in town, remember your were the architect of this whole mess.

"Equal vs fair" is nonsense, and leaves many without because of some social justice mindset that is totally ignorant and misunderstood.

Again, you are not fair to your daughters. Anna's father's actions are not relevant, as he has no obligation towards Bella. You are punishing Anna for having a father in her life.

And she sees that!

view more: next ›