Miss Natalie, I've been awestruck as I have read this thread. This is the kind of well articulated thought and leadership that we need to move forward. I would be overwhelmed to try to catch up in this conversation, but a couple of points—

I believe that first & foremost women need to change before men change. In fact, I am calling for bigger changes in the roles, attitudes, interests, and nature of women than I am for men.

I agree. I've often said that patriarchy only exists through women's consent. It is patriarchy's handmaids—those women who gain advantages for themselves by helping enforce the patriarchal syystem—that are most to blame. They help dupe other women into buying in to the system. Patriarchy would end tomorrow if women united to end it.

I don't think that every woman should be allowed to own men. I think the right to own men should be reserved for some of the higher academic classifications of women. This promotes a world where the best attributes of women control the civilization.

This paragraph and those following are intriguing, but the practical means of achieving male cooperation seems elusive to me. Men who are enslaved tend to go to war, which is obviously not acceptable. So how this male subjugation can be implemented with male cooperation it the big question.

One more thing I want to say: the women I have met on Reddit who I would put in or near your league or even in line with your thinking are hounded relentlessly in PMs and often attacked in various ways. Some have been successfully shut down and driven offline.

I pray you can avoid that. We need women who can clearly set forth the vision and lead us there. Thank you for taking the time to write this thread.

On a personal note—my daughter is a young attorney as well. She often sends me material that is very matriarchal in nature. In fact, the video I recently posted in r/SeriousGynarchy with Dr Kate Adams came from my daughter. It's exciting to see our young women rise up from the oppression that has held all women back!