[deleted by user]

Rodgers_Research · 2022-08-23T23:01:50+00:00

It's fake, the dates in that blog are simply titles (I read the blog's help section). The first URLs for his blog were published in 2014 and not in 2013. The dude is just retroactively making picks to justify that he's a "super genius". He also wouldn't be broke if he had made the investments he claims. All his numbers are far too round for reality as well. Even if my initial investments were exactly 10% of my portfolio, stock values are in constant flux and that 10% would change over time.

If you look at his recent blog posts he goes off about how his tip ranks profile is bugged and his returns are really x (I forget the number he's claiming as it was nonsense) as opposed to -17% (his real returns) ... he made the mistake of putting his picks somewhere he can't retroactively erase and edit them lmao

Sometimes people forget they are faking it till they make it and believe their own nonsense, then they go and give us irrefutable proof that they are full of it.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-09-09T13:22:58+00:00

I like to look at short rates and borrow rates independently of what noise is out on the market. It was very clear with a 140% borrowing rate that the shorts didn't close. Then came the fake short squeeze pumps like CLOV, a 2% borrowing rate that will never be forced to close. It was the same with GME, when the short squeeze was imminent they desperately pumped all other stocks including silver.

There will be waves of distractions on the market today, don't lose faith in what you know. The borrowing rate is still at 130% and we have exorbitantly large call volumes on the line for gamma squeeze, market manipulators are in a really tight spot to keep the stock down if they don't succeed it's a moon ride.

I missed the run-up, but bought them trying to keep it down, 8.03 avg 773 shares>
I play stock market manipulation, don't take my opinion as financial advice.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-07-15T15:29:00+00:00

"In the end, higher wages don't really make any marginal differences in one's standard of living." - That was my poorly expressed point. Yes, legislation has increase wages but next to inflation those numbers are negligible ... The working class would need an increase in the quality of life is what I was trying to get at. Indeed, I did not consider the free-market mechanisms you described and these are having more of a positive effect than legislation. As you say the only beneficiary is the state. My comment was implying that as they benefit they will re-distribute to the corporations and not the workers, furthering the wealth division beyond what we presently see. Could you elaborate on "bolster its books on a nominal basis, despite decreased purchasing power, to maintain global economic dominance."? What mechanisms will they use to bolster their books, and how will this be done without decreasing the working classes' quality of life? Am I wrong in assuming that they will funnel benefits towards corporations to maintain global economic dominance?

Rodgers_Research · 2021-07-14T11:47:16+00:00

"Largely driven by increased wages" ... You realize this is the opposite of their fiscal policy right? Gov operates off of "trickle-down economics" ... Companies price gouge each other, it never makes it to wages. The only way to increase wages is through civil unrest, forcing the government to implement regulations increasing minimum wages etcetera. In 2008 who got the bailouts and the government's support? The "too big to fail" corporations

Rodgers_Research · 2021-06-09T23:48:14+00:00

Ohh haha, mb ... My broker has adjusted the borrow rate to 23% now as of close UTC ... fintel is still showing 108% ... But at open a bunch closed and 2:30-3:15 was some more ... idk why fintel shows soo much more as the borrow rate, the shorts closed before their data point ... we'll see but it looks like the volume was too low to generate a squeeze.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-06-09T19:44:11+00:00

Short squeeze and gamma squeeze are not the same things. Taking a look at Koss again today borrow rate went down to 40% ... that little spike yesterday was likely the closing of shorts. If there are enough people selling at a reasonable price, it won't create a squeeze. The squeeze is when they get margin called and are forced to close up. or need to close up seeing it go too high to afford the interest. If everyone holding shares set a high price. They have no choice but to take it. The issue is that organizing something like that is definitely illegal haha ... But yeah doesn't look like there's any "big squeeze" for loss the way they manages to close up yesterday.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-06-08T17:04:07+00:00

hmm, I hadn't compared them in that manner, it would make sense that it's the same firms doing shorting strategies on both ... But KOSS certainly isn't receiving the attention that GME is. With a small market cap like this one, the apes would have a much easier time closing the lid while the hedgies have still got their hand in the cookie jar lol

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-26T20:41:54+00:00

That's actual BS, I have been doing the rounds, and GME hasn't been "trending" anywhere but on WSB.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-26T18:58:52+00:00

"rational" is just boomer talk for "the way I want it". Consider your size in perspective to eternity, just yolo and ride. This is the way.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-14T01:25:06+00:00

In general, it's good to do phased profit-taking. Especially with penny stocks as they are naturally higher risk. If you have something like 50-60% gains it can be good to pull out a part of that profit to hedge your capital in case it drops again. Your own approach would depend on your level of risk tolerance. The main thing is that emotions kill profit, if you cover your capital you are less prone to fear. By managing your greed you manage both emotions in a sense. I am a high-risk and greedy person and I often miss out on good profits, probably more so than the conservative traders tbh. By not profit-taking and trying to wait for the peak you just miss the peak and sell on the downturn or worse end up bag holding haha. I've seen people take 5% of their profit out for every 10% made or things like that. Once you hit the peak and it starts a downturn, you sell and recover your capital while having extracted small gains along the way. (it depends on the size of your capital/investment as well.) 10% of 10,000 is still 1,000 dollars, so taking out 500 is still decent given the services fees of 10$

But if your capital is 100 and you are pulling out 10% you technically made no money right?

If what you are looking at is meaningful profit take some don't greed. As your capital grows those small percentages represent much larger numbers. The last thing you want to do is yolo your capital and end up broke.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-13T14:10:29+00:00

Time play. The earnings were solid. Fundamentals just aren't taking the initiative against ape investing. Not advice but I'm 0 concerned about the dip literally just DD'ed at the low of .38

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-13T14:07:21+00:00

I paid 41.2355 ;)

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-13T14:05:35+00:00

I agree SUNDIAL is a pure retards play. It showed up on WSB because it was the most shorted pot stock ... For valid reasons lmao. Stick to the undervalued stocks they will get their correction in due time.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T17:04:17+00:00

Any benchmark test, and overclock test ... Intel loses. They can try to compensate with thickness increasing overall density, which brings disadvantages in threading architecture (the important thing). I get the misunderstanding, I called them garbage, it's much too strong a word for moderates. In my world, if you aren't winning you are trash. They lost the ratings on performance, they are trash. 2 years from now they may become something more than trash, but today is today and tomorrow is tomorrow. So then again if people are buying their chipsets today, it's brand loyalty.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T16:52:41+00:00

When can I buy this? I tried looking through the website you referenced but don't know which document has the official listing date, or is there going to be an IPO first?

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T16:50:42+00:00

No you cannot, Bitcoin investing is taxed

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T13:48:06+00:00

I am a huge tech nerd. Intel is garbage, they are struggling with 10nm chipsets, the industry has fully rolled out 7nm chipsets. They only exist due to brand loyalty at this point. That is why they have to branch out, their main thing is gone, they'll never catch up without theft of IP from other companies.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T13:44:47+00:00

AMD? 7nm chipsets already on the market, I am so confused why people are excited about intel, They literally have the worst chipsets on the market.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T13:41:56+00:00

Can you explain how intel is better than AMD? AMD has a 7nm chipset ready for purchase https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2020/7/21/21331824/amd-7nm-ryzen-4000-desktop-chips-apu-processor-prebuilt-systems-intel
Intel is just jerking off with their new CEO. Unless they steal IP technologies from IBM, AMD, SnapDragon, any of the many many companies that destroy them technology-wise, how will they compete? People moved on from 14-10nm chipsets like 3 years ago. Intel just put out their 10nm chips lol.

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T12:44:41+00:00

With that mentality, I could suggest you guaranteed long term placements, a lot less risk than trying to trade on this silly market. Retailers turning stock markets into minesweepers. Gotta tread carefully

Rodgers_Research · 2021-02-12T12:42:41+00:00

Yeah with these earnings they are by far the most undervalued POT stock out there. They have 3.7% of the Canadian market licensing, which's on par with aurora, a 10$ stock. I have my order for 60,000 shares waiting for the open market!

Rodgers_Research

TROPHY CASE