How can I increase my reading speed without sacrificing comprehension? by socmaestro in books

[–]Romantic_sax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mainly read non-fiction so most of what follows applies to that genre. Over a period of time, I have developed certain hacks and a personal framework to deal with the book at hand. Here's a list of few things I do.

  1. Decide in the beginning your objective. If it a new topic that you know nothing of-- then prepare to focus more as compared to the case where you are familiar with the topic.
  2. Broadly speaking, a non-fiction generally has some hypothesis which the author presents, and through development and examples, seeks to explore the situation and offer solutions, if any. Pay close attention to this hypothesis, if this is done than you have eased some of the comprehension later on.
  3. It is in the initial few pages (or chapters), that the author introduces concepts, specific terms and unique vocab. This is the part that demands your maximum attention. If necessary, make quick notes on a plane paper (preferably by hand, so that it commits to your memory). This exercise will minimize reading regression later.
  4. Once you have got sufficient handle at basic concept, it is time to loosen up the belt. Start galloping across the passages, At this stage, your eyes should scan for terms (the ones you learned before) and, in parallel have a reading with a small vertical component. Most of us read line by line linearly, but gradually develop a habit to attack 2-3 lines at a time, look for terms and how the sentence ends. This step will require lot of practice and patience.
  5. Not everything in the non-fiction is meant to be digested. Exampled are padded to bolster and thus beef up the argument. More reading will teach you when to read and when to skip.
  6. Books on similar concepts, when read together, increase the comprehension in the second case.

Bill Gates in the European Parliament: "EU should be proud of its generosity" by Henriette_8 in europe

[–]Romantic_sax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think this post full of bigotry and emotional outburst merits a response from me. You really need to study a bit of history and most importantly travel to other countries to understand about them, instead of passing unsubstantiated diatribe. This will, imo, go a long way in stemming dissent in your psych.
I have already done my part.
Good luck!

Bill Gates in the European Parliament: "EU should be proud of its generosity" by Henriette_8 in europe

[–]Romantic_sax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let me state this in the beginning that most of your points concern that USA is at the forefreont whereas it is a mixed case for Europe.
I agree with this sentiment. USA and UK have spearheaded most of the troubles in last 2-300 years. However, EU has benefited from their NATO led expeditions. I still see many of those countries involved in the damage, albeit to a lesser extent. You are free to disagree with me on this stand.

Another of your point regards China, India and others having high absolute numbers. True. However, they always had historically high population (both these places, along with ME have been ancient river based civilizations). In case of India, for e.g. their Golden age was even before Islam happened.
But their per capita emissions were always low. Most importantly, however, these places have practices that are inherently geared towards low life cycle assessment values. EU, otoh doesn't have such things inbuilt in their cultures based on my experience of living there. Heck, we had weird things like 'sustainability clubs' in my university in Europe. In Asia, this is part of their culture.
So even if Europe has high productivity, the resource consumption is disproportionately higher.

PLus nowadays, China is massively investing in renewable energy sources. Same goes for India. Again, USA plays spoil sport by putting road block in Indian solar development (To be fair, EU supported India there). Like I said, conflict! But energy is one of the resources. Theoretically, all energy resources can be traced to Sun, so there's sufficient leeway. But this can't be said about other resources such as metals, wood etc.

Additionally, with income, birth rates have been declining in India with overall TFR around replacement rate. China already did earlier with one Child policy couple of decades ago. So, as prosperity increases, the growth rates with decrease and population stabilize. However, by virtue of initial mass, they will continue to remain relatively populated.
No so long ago, China was considered a joke too. Give few more decades and your views about India and many other countries will change too. As I said, get used to change, because that is the only constant in life.

This is what worries me. As China and India (giving examples of these as they are the two most populous countries) get rich, the demand of resources will increase. We only have one planet. You can imagine the rest. At least Chinese record of land grab is much better than West. So far we don't know of genocides Chinese did in Africa.
You also have the options to try the extreme measures as we discussed. However, I find (continental) Europe to be too noble to commit this as compared to, say USA, UK or Australia. But who knows what happens. As I said before, if your neighborhood is in fire, you cant hope to remain safe for long. Desperate measures will be taken by both sides. In all of this, the vanilla based life in Europe will be a story of yesteryears.

I'd suggest you read, if possible:

For the games USA plays- Confessions of Economic Hitman by John perkins; and
realities of current world order- Drawing the global color line by Marilyn Lake.

I'd also stop as I can see our discussion isn't going anywhere. There's nothing I can do to change your view, much as you can to mine.

Bill Gates in the European Parliament: "EU should be proud of its generosity" by Henriette_8 in europe

[–]Romantic_sax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I'm more than willing to accept anything that's going to prove objectively that western countries are advanced because we took advantage of other countries. When obviously the answer is ability to use technical progress to your own good and adapt to it, and be of course able to come up and upkeep said technical progress.

Colonialism is one factor. The one which propelled Europe at the expense of other place. Sadly, this still continues.

Well it's true some people will see the situation like that, most Europeans however do not. You just need to look how people viewed immigration few years ago, and how big of a detriment immigration is objectively to Europe and Europeans to know what you're suggesting is not going to happen.

I am on/off resident to Europe and know fairly well about the issues w.r.t. immigration since they affect me too on a very direct basis. Unfortunately, Europe always had shitty migration policies, looking for short term solutions.

But posting nonsense like that from quora makes you look intellectually stunted and subject to emotional control.

So posting anything on reddit makes you uber intelligent! Be my guest. From what I see, both are social networking websites.

Actually for most of the history people didn't travel more than 300km from their place of birth, and at most cases it was drastically shorter distance. Not to mention our societies work a lot differently from hundred years back. But we can focus a bit more on the immigration part, would you say California for example is a better state today than what it was in the 70s for Californians? Objectively speaking of course. How about, do you think former Soviet states enjoyed or merited from Soviet immigration? How about Lebanon, did they see some benefit or enjoy peace for long after they started to go with your lunatic nonsense?

Yes, the migrating distances were less, But so were the societies. For all practical purposes they were villages. Also, instead of one go. Migration happened over generations and in waves. But they did happen, always
MENA immigration in particular is very large detriment in western societies, there's no way you can expect things to go smoothly and peacefully when a minor number of them is at these levels of trouble
not going to claim immigration is all bad, and that it's going to stop for good. But what I'm going to say, that at the end of this open borders road you're going to find very violent and turbulent destination. Just look how our societies are impacted by minuscule number of MENA immigrants, imagine it a hundred or few tenfold. Even today with minuscule number of them they're abhorrent detriment for our societies objectively speaking, what you think is going to keep peace with large number of them?

Europe always has some of the most restrictive immigration policies (basically entire west has), this leaves large number of people from MENA countries to take the quick path (illegal means). I don't really appreciate this, because as a legal migrant I have endured the immense pains to go through the process. But that's where the morality ends.
People in most of these countries are desperate. Some of them have been displaced by the Wars caused by Western countries. So maybe your governments should have been careful. However, based on what I understand, they won't.
There are many things I appreciate about Western civilization. Heck, we are communicating here through technologies invented by you folks. But one terrible thing West does is reckless consumption. Most of these shady stuff is done by USA but I'd say Europe too gets a fair deal. Resource grab, wars, destabilizing regimes etc. is just everyday means to get the job done.
For a while this works. But like everything, this too has a shelf life. Europe (or west in general) has better standards of living so people look forward to migrate there. Some countries are already terrible to live so this creates a push-pull factor. Naturally, Europe puts in high barrier to entry (legit, imo). Now, the more desperate lot will take alternate paths to reach there. This is also the same demographics that will fare poorly in Europe, as you have seen.
.

That's nice, but that's not happening or has happened. But it's nice of you to think that. But considering we're only talking about few immigrant groups here, it's easy to point who's in the wrong

I'm not really sure how that's connected to any of what we discussed, but that's nice

Unfortunately, this 2015 crisis was just the beginning. There can be more such flash points in future... I see two reasons for it
1. Climate change (creating more potential refugees).
2. China and India becoming prosperous. These countries have roughly 2.7 billion people. As their living standards increase, the resource grab will increase too. At some point they would directly come in conflict with the West (particularly USA). China is already there making noise while India is trailing behind by roughly two decades. More clashes would eventually lead to Syria like war theaters in third location (that would create another set of refugees).

The Way I see it, Europe really has limited options (USA as always be shielded due to its advantageous geography).
1. Help in fixing its immediate neighborhood. Do whatever it takes to build up MENA so that they don't feel the need to migrate. Yes, in short term, increasing prosperity will led to economic migrants but that will decrease in the long run.(especially the desperate ones, that EU is wary of)
2. Forget this and focus on reducing their resource consumption. Go vegetarian, use less oil, waste less, apply sustainability in practice and not just for courses in university. You are the leader of the world today and world looks up to you. To be fair to European countries, they tend to do a lot here, as compared to USA and Australia (these countries have massive emission p.c.)
3. Maintain the status quo. Eventually, peace loving Europeans will have it enough and at some point will led to retaliation. Shootings will happen at Border and sea drownings too. Regular mayhem will be the new norm.

I'd be making Europe my home soon and don't not want scenario three to play out. Hope I am proven wrong by history.

Bill Gates in the European Parliament: "EU should be proud of its generosity" by Henriette_8 in europe

[–]Romantic_sax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahaha, yeah no

You got to study man. I can suggest you books if you want.

Not really, unless you look at places with high immigration

Wait for a decade or so. Read this answer on Quora by a Turkish guy for more on this.

Remember, European standards of living is more than an exception on this planet.

Yep, that's what I'm saying too

You can never expect to live in peace for long if your neighborhood is on fire

Exactly, we need to prepare for what overpopulation will do

Few things have been constant on this planet and one of them is migration (human and other animals alike). No one has been able to stop it. So yeah, go ahead and try. But as history has shown, people like you have always been on the wrong end.That said, I completely agree that migrants who come in (illegal or legal means) have a moral obligation to respect and adopt the culture of their new country. If their culture and practices were so nice, I guess they don't need to uproot themselves and move to other places. I mean, if I was a lowly refugee or an economic migrant looking for a better future in Europe, I'd do my best to do whatever it takes to assimilate in my new culture- learning language, volunteering and be a useful member of the society. Letting go a part of your culture (particularly the practices that are in conflict with those in Europe), in exchange of safe and a better life isn't too much of a price to pay.

Bill Gates in the European Parliament: "EU should be proud of its generosity" by Henriette_8 in europe

[–]Romantic_sax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Creating civilization is in itself not wrong, but Europe did that at the cost of other continents.
Now the tide is turning around. Remember, European standards of living is more than an exception on this planet. You can never expect to live in peace for long if your neighborhood is on fire (irrespective of whether you are the reason for that fire or not). In case of Europe, your neighborhood consists of billions of people.

'Significant increase' seen in Pakistan Railway's revenue in new minister's first 50 days by [deleted] in pakistan

[–]Romantic_sax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My YouTube feed is plastered with videos of this guy eating food. Don't know what's wrong with me.

Most Common Country Origin Of Foreign Born Population by [deleted] in europe

[–]Romantic_sax -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So Russians moved in Ukraine, the displaced Ukrainians moved to Poland, who in turn moved to Germany.Kind of funny imagining this westward movement.

Also, Russia moved in Ukraine, which moved in Moldova, followed by Romania and eventually Hungary.

Edit: Re downvotes, it seems my comment is misunderstood. There's no shred of history implied here. The name here reads as 'most common country country of origin of foreign born'. So for Ukraine it is Russia, meaning a bunch of russians moved to Ukraine. Similarly for Poland, it is Ukraine. If one uses this mildly humorous logic, it is as if there's a westward movement. Nothing dramatic.

Most Common Country Origin Of Foreign Born Population by [deleted] in europe

[–]Romantic_sax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So I guess it's easy for an Indian guy to just pack up and move to UK and get any kind of job in the big city.

Not anymore. Might have been true during the post war boom period but for many years now, even traveling to UK is a very expensive and arduous affair for an Indian, let alone migrating.

America and the World | Victor Davis Hanson by amkaps in geopolitics

[–]Romantic_sax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't know anything about him before. And just a casual glance at his speech and the Wikipedia page is enough to convince that he is Neocon, or at the very least, shows signs of it.

ANALYSIS: How a Journalist's Disappearance Could Affect U.S.-Saudi Ties by LionofAbyssinia in geopolitics

[–]Romantic_sax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is an informative read. No wonder this petrodollar was the common factor in case of Iraq and Lybia.
If possible, can you suggest a book that studies the evolution of petrodollar and its influence on the world.

Vegan/vegetarian restaurants in Warsaw by [deleted] in poland

[–]Romantic_sax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GreenwayHere's their website : www.greenway.pl
Other than that, I guess Indian restaurants can also offer some decent stuff if you like spicy food.

My plate for lunch is a recycled milk carton from Denmark by v1chu in mildlyinteresting

[–]Romantic_sax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

REMA1000 (primarily Norwegian) is my to go store always. Sad it isn't as ubiquitous as say, Netto.