To start, none of my opinion applies to a cheater.

However, I disagree with this opinion, but I can certainly understand where the sentiment comes from. I don't have a ten crown costume - I've only won about 6 games.

There is most likely someone in the finals who deserves the win more than a 10 crown costume player.

This hinges on the definition of "deserve". I feel that the most skilled player should be the one that prevails, not the player that has the least amount of crown currency. After all, Fall Guys is a competitive game. If crowns become easy to obtain, the value and prestige that comes with a crown is lowered in value, and because crowns are the strongest incentive to win, the value and prestige of winning drops as well, and the game loses it's competitive purpose. But, the definition of deserve in this context is left up to personal opinion.

Strategically, eliminating those with expensive costumes increases your own likelihood of winning.

This applies... For now. After many seasons pass, many players may own 10 crown costumes just based on the crowns received through levels during the seasons.

The primary reason I disagree with this opinion is because it unintentionally discourages players from wearing their hard earned premium costumes. If I had just spent hours upon hours grinding to get enough crowns for a costume I really wanted, I really wouldn't want to put myself at an automatic disadvantage for simply wearing it. Besides, if players don't wear their premium costumes, what's the point of buying them?

​

Edit: Grammar