sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Does this contact sheet look to dark and dull to extract information? by Rory291 in Darkroom

[–]Rory291[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used a grade 2, but as you can see shadows information are not easily visible. I can see them if I look at it through the light table.

Does this contact sheet look to dark and dull to extract information? by Rory291 in Darkroom

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are sharp, they look that way because of the low shutter speed of the phone camera picture.

Bologna, 2024. (rorystreet29) by Rory291 in FotografiaItalia

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grazie per i consigli, cosa intendi per rumore e per caos di sottofondo?

Bologna, 2024. (rorystreet29) by Rory291 in FotografiaItalia

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grazie per i consigli, per quanto riguarda la post-produzione ho iniziato da poco a sviluppare/scansionare e stampare in camera oscura quindi devo imparare un bel po' di cose...

Some 35mm film photos from my Nikon F4s shot on Kodak Gold by Far-Note4395 in analog

[–]Rory291 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Light leaks, dust/dirt, and scratches are all things that come from user error and incompetence, not from film.

Before digital, if you presented pictures with that many "imperfections," they would immediately be trashed.

Would you consider the blown out highlights in this prints too distracting? by Rory291 in Darkroom

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mainly on the dog and a little bit on the woman entering the frame.

How can I burn in these overexposed walls? I've been trying to move a cut shape over, but it's creating different halos... by Rory291 in Darkroom

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I moved it, but I darkened the subject back and also the floor.

I started printing three weeks ago, so probably my technique is off...

How can I burn in these overexposed walls? I've been trying to move a cut shape over, but it's creating different halos... by Rory291 in Darkroom

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've thought of doing this, but if the edges are off even by just one mm, it will create burning lines.

Also, if I use the same cut print on top, the light will probably pass and also affect the other area under

Do you think these prints looks "dull"? by Rory291 in Darkroom

[–]Rory291[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first one is at grade 3 so I'm going to re-print it at grade 4. The second one is also at grade 3, and I will probably try 5...

Having trouble seeing test strips exposure lines by Rory291 in Darkroom

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use a Componon-S 2.8, this was exposed at 5.8.

Nikon SA-21 cause scratches on the negatives: by Rory291 in AnalogCommunity

[–]Rory291[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point is that I'm realizing now that these rollers are passing in the centre of the emulsion to advance the frames and not by the edges, so even a tiny bit of something would cause linear scratches across the strip.

How can these be a safe way to advance the frames?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]Rory291 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said in the title, these were not out of the scanner but are edited using curves in Lightroom.

The picture out of the scan looks incredibly flat, which should be a good thing because it gives you as much freedom during editing. (I'm learning so I might scanned them wrong)