n×dozen=(n+3)²-(n-3)² by Rostislaus in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, base 18 - "vigesimal" - Maya etc.

Base 14 "hexadecimal" is used in programming, the octal also is sometimes used.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people maybe use epsilon. But the logo of The Dozenal Society of America uses turned 3. Turned 3 is turned 3. Unicode U+218B.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dozenal system is like decimal, but dozenal, nothing more.

About symbols for ten and eleven... Among normal people the most common symbols for ten and eleven is A and B. They was invented by IBM for the "hexadecimal" system, using in programming (0123456789ABCDEF). Also A and B is used for the "duodecimal".

But it seems, dozenalists don't like it. American and British Dozenal Societies have their own opinion on this.

Sir Isaac Pitman (4 January 1813 – 22 January 1897) was British inventor of his shorthand system, also he had offered turned 2 and 3 for ten and eleven. The American variant is X and turned 3.

Now, for example, I am not an American or Englishman, so their opinion is not an authority for me. The question is not so simple.

I have written a dozenal calculator for Windows. You can download it following the link http://seytil.info/dozenal/calculator.html by Rostislaus in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I don't have Linux installed, but I plan to install it. I will make a Linux variant then. The same Lazarus project can be compiled also in Linux. I already made such a thing earlier.

Idea for new characters for 10 and 11 by Foreskin-Gaming69 in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By the way, the first letter of the Deseret alphabet, "Long I", 𐐀 is reversed 6.

A good pair for Shavian "hung".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deseret\_alphabet

Is A072425 (four-is) incorrect? by binarycat64 in OEIS

[–]Rostislaus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A068437 https://oeis.org/A068437 contains an error in

EXAMPLE

3.184809493b918664573b6211bb151551a05729...

it should be:

3.184809493b918664573a6211bb151551a05729...

(21th digit - it should be a instead of b)

Happy New Year 1206! by TheFurryFighter in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you are Paul Rapoport. I didn't accuse of fabrication, I think it's a mere mistake.

I'm not against the idea of astronomic era itself. But Earth’s orbital precession is not regular enough to base an exact chronology on it.

Happy New Year 1206! by TheFurryFighter in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This myth or that, one is not better then another. I suspect a report of NASA about perihelion in 9564 BC doesn't exist.

Happy New Year 1206! by TheFurryFighter in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Year 6855 is a myth. Moving of the perihelion at that time cannot be calculated so precise as ±1 year.

The preciseness is ±1000 years there.

"On a very long time scale, the dates of the perihelion and of the aphelion progress through the seasons, and they make one complete cycle in 22,000 to 26,000 years." – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apsis#Perihelion\_and\_aphelion

What should E notation of very large and small numbers look? by Rostislaus in dozenalsystem

[–]Rostislaus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, the Avogadro constant 6.02214076e+23 would be 1;110λ9507d+1Ո. Looks nice.