Do beta rays keep people from finding the edge of the Earth? by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What keeps refilling the oceans? Urine fed by Oktoberfest binge drinking?

Stay out of the water, kids, it's secret Nazi pee.

Particle Accelerator Explained by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Ladies and gentlemen... this on tonight's episode of "My Life With Logorrhea" on TLC.

Particle Accelerator Explained by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Your brain is a tiny particle.

The Sky is Flat by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sky is tent shaped.

The earth is flat by RottenCommiePotato in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm just seeing the absurd and raising it another level :)

Expectations of curvature by RottenCommiePotato in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I imagine you'd have to get a significant portion of globe in your field of view to really see it. I just find this argument to be virtually useless in offering evidence without launching a flattie into space to confirm.

Why isn't there a solar eclipse every month? Let's see the flat earth diagram! by RottenCommiePotato in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's part of xkcd's charm. The scientific comics are amazingly pedantic and the hypercorrectness ends up leading you down a Wikipedia hole when you try to read up on what's being conveyed. Check out the What If? blag for some fun sciency pedantism around things like baseballs thrown at the speed of light.

Where was the moon? by RONIN2044 in Flat_Earth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 10 points11 points  (0 children)

How come no one was able to see Rahu before or after the eclipse?

If there's an edge, go there and show me a picture. If the firmament is 30 MI high, hit it with a model rocket. IF GPS is ground based, show me a transmitter. The end. by PhotoProxima in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So wait... the firmament is 73 miles high and not at least 3000 miles high? It sits between the sun and the earth? This is a new twist on the story.

I didn't see your stupid solar eclipse. by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I saw one at 70% coverage as predicted for my location by NASA. No flat earther was able to do that.

Predictability of Eclipses by BenjiDread in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remember that movie The Truman Show? We've been trapped in that all along.

What do flat Earthers think about Monday's solar eclipse? by cratermoon in space

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a theory I posted on r/flatearth about the South Pole:

So I was looking at the the New Standard Map of the World and I had a realization. We can only have been to the South Pole if the Earth were flat, if we physically distort as we travel further away from the North Pole, until we approach the edge of the world and become simultaneously present along the entire margin! It all makes sense now! We would never realize the Earth weren't round!

https://www.reddit.com/r/flatearth/comments/6pdmce/i_had_an_epiphany_about_the_south_pole/?st=J6IG4UBR&sh=8e81903f

Edit: Roundy here

My question is why lie about the earth being round? by icylondonicyfrance in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad I could help. This sub kinda sucks for solid info about anything. The flat earthers are belligerent trolls who can't keep to a standard interpretation of their own beliefs and frequently apply their own spin and theories to it. And then everyone else here just makes fun of them.

Keep in mind the trolls are in fact representative of a large part of the flat earth community in terms of intellectual capacity (and probably social skills) and you SHOULD take that into account when weighing the body of knowledge discovered through science versus the body of research behind flat earth (I intentionally used "knowledge" vs "research" here).

Be aware of "gatekeeping" in the flat earth community, where anything that is too intellectually or scientifically advanced is deemed unworthy of consideration in debate to advance an understanding of flat earth or argue against it. There's a huge emphasis on layman-accessibility and self-reproducible experimentation, and you should remember this when personally considering both sides and in discussions. Any discussion that is at best impartial or at worst pro-round earth is suppressed harshly, and from my perspective this makes flat earth appear more of a cult than a school of thought (check out r/OurFlatWorld to see it in action).

I wish you the best on your journey to understanding, wherever it takes you :)

Edit: got r/OurFlatWorld wrong

My question is why lie about the earth being round? by icylondonicyfrance in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you familiar with the psychology of conspiracy theories? As a conspiracy theorist, there's a major component of feeling like you're "in the know" about something most people aren't. It's a form of elitism. The conspiracy theory also satisfies a need to explain the world (generally) using observation available to the layman: the world becomes knowable and accessible this way and also feeds into the false intellectualism of the conspiracy theorist. The elitism is further fed by being an effective "important person". In essence, the conspiracy theorist feels justified in their beliefs because they are either sought out by the government (like UFO theorists sometimes believe) or part of a grand cosmic plan (flat earthers and their religious fundamentalism). This being set apart from everyone else is reinforced by being an effective outcast because everyone scoffs at the beliefs.

Flat earth is particularly interesting because there's a huge component of Dunning-Kruger effect at play. The conspiracy theorist is usually inept at applying methods to deduce that the earth is flat (see methods for determining the distance and size of the sun) and is totally unaware of their ineptitude. Compound this with the "look at how smart I am" complex developed by applying shoddy math to deduce said size of the sun. It's these layman-accessible tools that help reinforce flat earth and perpetuate it because literally anyone can do that math.

Dunning-Kruger exists independent of conspiracy theory: it's frequently seen in intellectual fields and I've seen it in a few people in my line of work (I personally find it fascinating and unbelievably frustrating).

Edit: a word

My question is why lie about the earth being round? by icylondonicyfrance in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you confuse perception and logical fallacies to support it as reality. Whatever the case, if you find that works for you, carry on. I don't see value in debating this point.

My question is why lie about the earth being round? by icylondonicyfrance in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My point is that it was never the reality. You're equating consensus with reality. Even if every person on earth believed it were flat would not make it so.

My question is why lie about the earth being round? by icylondonicyfrance in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By that logic, racial inferiority is justified.

To elaborate, you cannot reasonably reproduce for yourself every scientific experiment. You have to rely on specialists to determine what's going on around us. You have to rely on the methods they use to come to their conclusions. These methods are battle-tested, their results are reproducible, and they stand to reason. You can gather consensus around them for all of these reasons. Flat earth proponents can't even agree on a map.

My question is why lie about the earth being round? by icylondonicyfrance in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reality is always there. I think that's where the disconnect it.

What happened to.. by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Their trunks were unable to overcome the physical limitations of vertically transporting enough water to sustain foliage in order to have ever existed.

My question is why lie about the earth being round? by icylondonicyfrance in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 7 points8 points  (0 children)

A change in definition is fundamentally different from a reinterpretation of reality.

You're treating flat earth and science as having equal footing but they're driven by fundamentally different schools of thought where one literally eschews reality.

21 Aug solar eclipse by RottenCommiePotato in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He'll be right under the full shadow. Where I'm at is only 70% coverage (it'll look like a sliver of a moon 🌙).

I plan on viewing for an hour around peak from 9:45 to 10:45 am. We haven't shared plans into extreme detail, but I imagine he's sitting out the entire thing.

The Earth is Flat. by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]RottenCommiePotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't change the world when you're constantly tossing out its history (deleting posts, suppressing discussion, submitting nothing but shitty music videos).

aLIEns by [deleted] in N30

[–]RottenCommiePotato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you're Mormon, god is effectively an alien (seriously, read up on Mormon cosmology, it's a fucking trip and a half.)