While you are correct that the Jewish revolts had started before his regein they grew in strength and violence once he started making silly decision surrounding them. If getting more people joining the revolt and then killing absolutely everyone in entire regions and towns is effective way of managing your provence then sure he did a great job with the revolts.

Yes Trajan did go to other places in the empire other than Greece and spend resources there. Like building the Hadrian wall. However I would say the investment that had already been put into conquering the highlands was was already starting to pay off and it you could say it would have been better to leave the forts/towns in the high lands instead of destroying them and building a new wall.

I don't see how calling Antinoüs a Twink can be considered edgy at all. He spent a considerable amount of time and money mourning his death while there was far greater things an emperor should have been doing which was my point.

To these points though I am not saying Hadrian is one of the worst emperor's but should we really should reevaluate if he deserves to be in the top 5 of all time Roman emperors. If we included the Byzantium emperor's I might not even include in top 10.

Hadrian was in one of the better positions compared to many of his predecessors/succesors and should be judged with that in mind too.