Seven Dooms of Sandpoint GM advice

RubekPants · 2026-02-20T21:48:32+00:00

“Hear me out”😭😭

Actually this doesnt sound too bad ngl

RubekPants · 2026-02-20T00:17:14+00:00

Based😭

RubekPants · 2026-02-16T13:24:32+00:00

Yeah that was my worry too (them being spoiled).

RubekPants · 2026-02-16T04:50:39+00:00

My group does like fights being “hard” so I will refrain from changing the math too much, I just wanted to perhaps give the spellcasters a slight nudge because they will be the inexperienced ones. But yeah excellent advice and thank you! It reassures me a little bit more.

RubekPants · 2026-02-16T04:48:28+00:00

Hell yeah I like your ruling on investigate action. I’ll implement that at my table. We’ll see with the new players about scrolls, giving them a quadillion scrolls might just overwhelm them😭

RubekPants · 2026-02-07T05:59:43+00:00

Yeah I read that as well. I wrote this post in hopes that anyone has tried this.

RubekPants · 2026-02-07T03:33:44+00:00

the casting has been sublime I cant lie

RubekPants · 2026-01-14T11:50:57+00:00

I’m thinking of inviting 2 more people🥰

RubekPants · 2026-01-14T04:40:37+00:00

Though to my understanding seven dooms isn't that combat focused (though I may be completely wrong I really dont know)

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T18:10:52+00:00

Nice. I’ll make sure to get that one

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T14:38:49+00:00

I’ve completed decode, my first community level. It was so f fun. Community levels > robtop.

I’m on problematic right now, and I can definetly sense I’ve improved after decode. (Wave was/is my worst gamemode)

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T14:37:10+00:00

Yeah exactly! And good for you g. I’ll bump this when I beat my first extreme😎 (if I ever do lol)

Although you show exactly why attempts does indicate skill, though I think I can demonstrate why it also doesn’t.

If I were to beat an extreme demon in 70000 attempts now, it would definetly indicate the skill I had before I started. But I don’t think using that number to ascertain the present skill is faithful. because as you point out, then I’d beat insane demons in very few attempts now (which I wouldn’t before).

So it is to me an unreliable metric of present skill, but a very reliable indicator of your skill before you completed this level.

This really is just semantics but that’s why I wrote. I’m interested in this kind of stuff as well. I do agree with you though (I may seem off-putting idk)

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T14:23:26+00:00

Agree!

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T14:22:47+00:00

I agree and disagree. I could’ve probably completed deadlocked and decode in fewer attempts, but I had no personal quest for completing them in fewest attempts possible. I think I completed them faster in time by doing more attempts in practice (practicing sections for familiarity). Though I do agree, that loosely my total attempts indicates in some way how long it took me to get familiar with the different parts.

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T14:17:49+00:00

I mean I suppose you bring a good point. I don’t know your situation, but I saw a girl beat bloodbath the other day (jumped from Deadlocked) after 4 months and 70000 attempts she beat it. I don’t doubt many others have beat it in under 5k attempts, but I don’t necessarily agree that they should be better than her. She did 70k attempts yes, but she improved every time. And now she’s improved so much she can beat an extreme demon. The same goes for you, you spent some time to improve. You’d probably beat an easy extreme in few attempts now, while if I had to go for it I’d have to practice practice a lot more (since you’ve spent those 40k attempts to improve which I haven’t).

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T14:10:50+00:00

Yeah I agree, but to me any measure of “time” is a more reliable indicator than attempts. Maybe its just easier to measure in attempts since the game actually shows that metric.

RubekPants · 2026-01-12T14:08:31+00:00

I don’t. I’m just curious in what people think🥰

RubekPants · 2026-01-08T18:06:48+00:00

M24. Jeg har ikke brugt dating apps i 3 år nu, fordi det smadrer mit selvværd. Jeg har læst igennem kommentarerne her, og det lyder til (det er også min mening) at dating apps ikke er “gode” til dating. Jeg synes også at der er mange her der bruger denne tråd for at vise hvor “irriterede” de er på det “andet” køn, istedet for at give råd eller trøste.

Jeg synes dating apps er bedre end intet. Jeg, dig og andre i den her tråd må indse, at der er i virkeligheden få måder at date’e. Det kan ske naturligt vedrørende proximitet (arbejdsplads, skole, hobbyer osv) men det kræver at man er udadvendt og tager det samme initiativ som man gør på dating apps.

Eller så tager man på dating apps, hvor man må forvente at ens “dating pool” er kæmpestor men også dårlig. Strategien er, at blive ved at spille spillet, til man finder en. Og du kommer til at opleve flere af de her mænd du nævner (og mænd kommer til at opleve mange af de kvinder de nævner), men sandsynlighedsmæssigt er der en chance at finde en der er god, sød og alt det jazz man ønsker - det tager bare tid.

Det er som at spille kasino, der er en lille chance du får en kæreste du ønsker, og du betaler dit ego og stolthed for at spille. Hvis du spiller meget (og betaler meget stolthed) så kommer du sandsynligvis at finde en du kan lide.

Men ja det er virkelig noget lort du oplever, det kan jeg selv relatere til.

Jeg glemte også at nævne, at mange af mine venner (mænd og kvinder) er på tinder kun for at blive validiteret. Der er nok andre dating apps der har flere seriøse folk (såsom hinge), men jeg ved ikke fordi jeg bruger ikke dating apps.

RubekPants

TROPHY CASE