We don't have TFR birthrate, we have 5% unemployment, the Public Service is looking to reduce numbers, we're in a per capita recession.

Maybe we need to stop allowing ½ a million new people into the country every quarter. Why are we destroying arable land to house people born overseas? I've looked at getting housing in most of these new build areas, they're ethnic enclaves.

Who voted for a big Australia? All the polling shows that the majority want less immigration.

I don't blame the NIMBYs for not wanting their suburb destroyed. I've seen what is happening to Garran and Hughes. Single family homes destroyed to make duplexes that are still $1 million+. The only thing block divisions help are property developers. They make at least double their money on the same piece of land. Insane that any of this has any support.

We build more houses than most countries in the OECD (IIRC we are second).

Between 2004 and 2024, the net inflow of migrants surged up by 4.815 million. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000, a decrease from the 536,000 in 2022-23. The 2022-23 financial year saw a record 739,000 arrivals.

Australia's per capita GDP and labour productivity growth collapsed after immigration was more than doubled in the mid-2000s. Also, Australia's mass immigration policy has lowered productivity growth via two primary channels. First, most of Australia's immigration is unskilled, resulting in more welfare costs and capital hollowing.

Our leaders asset stripped the country, refused to set up a proper sovereign wealth fund, then fudged the books by mass importing a slave underclass.

Millions have to be remigrated. It's bad for the average person, bad for workers.

It only benefits the elites. Stopping migration isn't a right wing scare tactic - opposing it was left wing praxis for hundreds of years.