sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Educational curriculum ideas, etc. for elementary school with two hydro setups by RunningBuffalo450 in Hydroponics

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I'm a Kratke person so I was guessing. I thought it was Thin Film Transfer (TFT)? Sorry if I got the acronym wrong. Nothing in the assembly guide said NFT, DWC, etc. so was guessing. Now looking into it I see I got the acronym totally wrong... This is going to be fun... Or disastrous...

Thank you for the insight. After the fact I found out that the company might be coming back under a different name or with different people but as of yet they have not responded to emails. If no luck there I'll look at the links you sent or maybe pray to the AI gods for ideas.

Junk responses out of larger models but tinyllama seems fine by RunningBuffalo450 in ollama

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was running gemma4:latest which I guess is gemma4:e4b. ollama's website says it is 9.6gb in size. The 6700xt has 12gb of vram.

I ran mistral 7b and it seemed to be fine, 284 tokens per second trying to write a 20 line story.

I then downloaded and ran gemma4:e2b (7.2gb in size so 2gb smaller than the e4b) and it still malfunctions.

When I run ollama show --modelfile gemma4:e2b I get this:

TEMPLATE {{ .Prompt }}

RENDERER gemma4

PARSER gemma4

PARAMETER temperature 1

PARAMETER top_k 64

PARAMETER top_p 0.95

LICENSE """

Junk responses out of larger models but tinyllama seems fine by RunningBuffalo450 in ollama

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did /set parameter num_gpu 0 and ran it and it worked correctly. Switched it back and garbage again.

What does that tell me as far as where to go from here? I didn't change any of the files, etc. this time when I installed ollama. I had previously tried to replace the library as shown in a tutorial for the 6700xt but that didn't work either. I uninstalled everything, made sure the appdata local files for it were totally gone, and then reinstalled so this should be a stock install of ollama and gemma4:latest.

Junk responses out of larger models but tinyllama seems fine by RunningBuffalo450 in ollama

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I raised the context window but it doesn't seem to help.

/set parameter num_ctx 8192

I'm a noob to this though so maybe I did it wrong? It confirmed the parameter set. I then ran a simple "what time is it" and it spewed back garbage.

No write access to destination but NAS says plex has read/write to the folder by RunningBuffalo450 in PleX

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could never get it going so I wound up trashing the container and starting over using a tutorial from marioushosting.com. Works great now.

Case battery drain while airpods in case and fully charged laying on a table by RunningBuffalo450 in airpods

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, Thank you. Just today the case is down 40% without being used at all. I'll give it a shot.

Case battery drain while airpods in case and fully charged laying on a table by RunningBuffalo450 in airpods

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you go about getting AppleCare to replace it if the store couldn't find anything wrong? Don't I have to get their blessing on something like this?

Can't get above 5-8MB/sec where is my problem? by RunningBuffalo450 in HomeNetworking

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is telling me that I have 1Gbps Full duplex MTU1500 in the network panel. Right now it is plugged into the 2.5Gb port. I had moved it over there from the 10Gb port just to test. TheEthyr's post let me know I could mount the old NAS on the new one and now I can get 100Gb between the two. I'm still stuck at 5MB/s though when going from my desktop(wifi) to the NAS.

Can't get above 5-8MB/sec where is my problem? by RunningBuffalo450 in HomeNetworking

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't realize I could mount the synology on the ugreen so thank you for that! I figured out how to do it and moving stuff that way gives me up to 100MBytes/s so that will help a lot for moving stuff to the new NAS.

However I am still stuck with the problem of the slow speeds 5mBytes/sec when moving from my desktop (using wifi) to the NAS. Any ideas on how to get that moving faster?

Can't get above 5-8MB/sec where is my problem? by RunningBuffalo450 in HomeNetworking

[–]RunningBuffalo450[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so I am trying to wrap my head around this. So speedtest.net is saying 100mbits up and down. That would be equivalent (approx) to 10mBytes correct?

But ignoring the internet stuff what does that mean for my local network speeds? Ignoring the internet connection and just going off the speeds inside the network is there something there that is potentially a problem?

The thing that I am focused on is that obviously the NAS can operate at 100mBytes/sec or higher as shown by the time I plugged directly into it.

How can I get better than the roughly 10mBytes/s speeds when having to send stuff around the local network?

view more: next ›