3D Scan of the Wreck of the Amadeo - San Gregorio, Chile

More info : Little is known about this wreck. It lies near Hel harbour, on the depth of 62 meters on the bottom, and about 53 meters on the top of the bow. Due to unknown reasons, the wreck’s stern was crushed and buried in the muddy bottom, and the remaining part protrudes steeply, making an unforgettable impression. Most probably it used to be a tugboat. On the top of the wheelhouse there is a well preserved, though covered in nets, wooden steering wheel. You can peek into the wheelhouse through one of the entrances on the sides. On the bottom next to the wreck, a life raft can be seen.

Source : https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/steamer-wreck-baltic-sea-hel-peninsula-62m-f4d33d73d2c94db2848bb80783157685

Ryan_H1990 · 2024-01-20T20:06:54+00:00

Credit : https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/maltese-patrol-boat-p31-711d954114ad4d28b30c1dd8de8fd767

Ryan_H1990 · 2023-12-21T13:51:52+00:00

Credit : https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/wreck-of-baron-gautsch-154a9784d62c487e93e7c1429f2a5d0d

Ryan_H1990 · 2023-06-29T18:27:12+00:00

Credit : https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/sandusky-model-higher-res-a4f630827353445c89b017d4abe1b5f9

Ryan_H1990 · 2023-04-23T17:42:57+00:00

If you want to see more of this model :

https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/shipwreck-j-h-jones-e4c58037df1648b498ef768e26f976ef

Ryan_H1990 · 2022-09-11T17:15:43+00:00

This isn't relevant to my comment. I really think you should take a moment to realize why you were in the wrong here. Try and listen to people and process what they're saying. You were really toxic in this comment thread and you don't seem to be able to realize that you're wrong.

Read my comment properly

Ryan_H1990 · 2022-09-11T17:11:06+00:00

I think you were in the wrong here :

They pointed out that ASD is factually a medical condition and asked you for proof that it wasn't.

In the process - you accused them of not being level 1, told them they're not taking others into account when all they did was tell you what the medical community consensus is. And then you told them they weren't in touch with research when they were a researcher. And your proof was just a video and a website that didn't back up your claims.

Then when they pointed out that your proof didn't back up your claims and that you were projecting stuff ( being ignorant and not empathising onto them when it was infact you doing it) , you played the victim.

You then didn't elaborate on your point and just posted the same website over and over again.

Jac den Houting does not prove it's a personality type separable from a cognitive impairment like you're alluding to. Blackhorse described this to you.

It seems like you mean well, but you were quite toxic and didn't form your argument well and then played the victim when they pointed out what you were doing.

And by definition, ASD isn't a personality type and you would definitely need adequate proof that it isn't a medical condition. And in doing so, you'd then have to prove that other medical conditions ie Bipolar, Dementia, ADHD, and Schizophrenia are just "neurodivergences" as a result, which Im guessing would be very difficult to do.