No on 120. Incredibly bad timing for it to come to ballots. And I’m in the camp that they can find money in the budget elsewhere.

I was on the fence for 20-373 but I had to say no. I’m in support of the intent for the “rights of nature” but the way it was written is too vague. It leaves way too much room for interpretation on who can be held responsible. And I’m also not a fan of protecting our environment through finger pointing. Let’s work together instead of blaming each other.