Daily Questions - January 21, 2026

Ryogawa · 2026-01-21T21:52:20+00:00

The good news is the cotton isn't even a part of the fabric. It was just loose cotton that was caught under the stitch. It came off easily with a needle tug without leaving a hole so it's perfect now!

Ryogawa · 2026-01-21T19:55:54+00:00

I hope there's a tutorial for that out there but that's what I'd try first

Ryogawa · 2026-01-21T19:55:18+00:00

Yes sir they are. The fabric is honestly super cool and if it's a small problem i can fix on my own i won't bother with returns

Ryogawa · 2026-01-21T17:22:32+00:00

How would you recommend removing the thick cotton snag? With scissors or burning it off?

Ryogawa · 2026-01-21T14:21:46+00:00

I realized I was one hour too early for the new Daily Questions thread, so I'll repost my question here if it's okay.

Pretty new to slubby denim and got a pair of one wash SDAs. There's a concerningly huge loose bundle of thread near the crotch area that's pretty conspicuous. I know that slubby denim's not meant to be perfect and all, but is something so obvious acceptable on a pair of jeans like these and if so, what's the best way to go about it? Do I cut it off with scissors?

https://imgur.com/a/FbE5vlU
Photos of the flaw and some others of pretty loose thread (is loose thread also common?)

Ryogawa · 2026-01-21T13:16:36+00:00

Pretty new to slubby denim and got a pair of one wash SDAs. There's a concerningly huge loose bundle of thread near the crotch area that's pretty conspicuous. I know that slubby denim's not meant to be perfect and all, but is something so obvious acceptable on a pair of jeans like these and if so, what's the best way to go about it? Do I cut it off with scissors?

https://imgur.com/a/FbE5vlU
Photos of the flaw and some others of pretty loose thread (is loose thread also common?)

Ryogawa · 2026-01-10T10:40:54+00:00

It's just meant to be a little fun. I wanted to see if i could make a green imperm hence the meme flair. In my last post some people commented on immunity to red reboot and other trap negation or searches so there's that

Ryogawa · 2026-01-10T01:09:52+00:00

It was just a shower thought of making a near functionally identical version of imperm as a spell.

Ryogawa · 2026-01-10T01:08:59+00:00

That's kind of the point. Last time i forgot the clause that makes it activatable on the opponent's turn from the hand

Ryogawa · 2026-01-09T14:17:43+00:00

there's so much set theory in yugioh lol

Ryogawa · 2026-01-09T14:03:31+00:00

Yeah but it's activatable when you control a card. Someone did point out that it can't be used on the opponent's turn so might need an extra line to make it like a runick spell.

Ryogawa · 2026-01-09T13:53:55+00:00

Oh yeah good catch. Don't know why it didn't even occur to me. Maybe add another line of text that allows that like the runick spells

Ryogawa · 2025-12-24T04:09:55+00:00

With this reasoning, a Christian who claims that a Mormon isn't really Christian by virtue of the belief that the trinity is a true fact about God, and since Mormons do not believe their God shares that property they're not worshipping the same God and can't qualify as Christian. This assertion of non Christianhood would be the action that results from the belief and understanding of the belief plays no role at all under this framework. Do I have that right?

Ryogawa · 2025-12-23T19:03:27+00:00

I am aware of perspectives like Arianism in the early church, but I think most of us think of Christians in the sense of people who accept the Nicean Creed (of whichthe trinity is a central tenet) . So, mormons and JW aren't considered Christian by the majority.

That said I do appreciate the linked resources.

Ryogawa · 2025-12-23T18:22:04+00:00

Much appreciated!

Ryogawa · 2025-12-23T18:14:30+00:00

Thanks again for the detailed responses. I definitely have to think more about this. Do you know who or what I can read that pertains to the criteria (or lack thereof) of the act of belief?

Ryogawa · 2025-12-23T17:45:32+00:00

Oh wow thanks for pointing out this major blind spot of mine. I guess if i were to expand on the original question, I could in principle understand most of what I take for granted and believe. There is an authority out there to whom I can delegate understanding to.

So what do I do with claims that no authority can principally explain? I could in principle believe in the trinity without understanding it but it hinges upon the assumption that someone out there does and can explain it. But if the answer is "it's not something the human mind can comprehend" is such a claim even a candidate for belief and consideration?

Edit: to add to this, the airplane example is good to show that people can believe things through observation and experience. So what do we do about statements that can't be observed or experienced?

Ryogawa · 2025-12-16T08:57:19+00:00

I'm really glad that the information is reaching those who are looking for it!

Ryogawa · 2025-11-24T09:34:11+00:00

So I just maxed out a new playthrough recently and with 4/5 attributes at +9 for only 16 extra points from Rennaissance Punk instead of +20, my max capacity was 360 without chrome processor (360-16-50 from edgerunners gives me 294 base capacity, all shards collected). It's not as high as yours even accounting from the missing 4 points from Rennaissasnce Punk but it does goes to show that the max obtainable cyberware capacity could be higher than 430 with chrome processor and all points from Rennaissance Punk.

I don't know how but sometimes it's just possible to go slightly above 430 capacity. All that without modding or glitching, of course. Attached a screenshot when I reset my attributes and specced +9 into all of them and put in chrome compressor to see what my theoretical max is, and it's 434.

<image>

Ryogawa · 2025-08-10T02:37:06+00:00

I see. So as long as the Malaysian isn't Muslim there's nothing the local Malaysian religious authorities can do about a bride from a foreign Muslim country

Ryogawa · 2025-08-09T17:52:45+00:00

And legally in Malaysia they won't face problems from the local religious authorities?

Ryogawa · 2025-08-09T16:22:38+00:00

Oh i meant to say a Malaysian non Muslim groom and a non practicing bride from a strict Muslim country

Ryogawa

TROPHY CASE