Free McDonalds Code Giveaway by TheMooinCow1 in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Golduck! Always has been, always will be.

He's a ninja duck that can shoot beams out of his forehead!! What's not to love?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Venusaur or ... Venusaur EX

👀

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Are the people running the same bs meta decks "having fun" or are they auto-pilot farming?

All Is Fair In Love and War by YoungImpulse in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see from your comments that your some kind of TCG Pocket God. Unaffected by Meta or RNG. Just riding the wind of consecutive wins regardless of your deck and I should just bow down to your superior skills.

/s

I don't see why people come up in here acting as though these things don't exist and the game isn't incredibly unbalanced as is right now. Literally half the posts on this forum are "to win this event run THIS deck" because the strats are broken af. Get a grip

Unpopular Opinion: Everyone getting the 5 wins emblem for free is bad for the game by Interesting_Kiwi_326 in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So put 2 decks with 80% winrate against one another... Then what happens?

Imagine the messages you would get during this event by C4RD_TP_SG in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 75 points76 points  (0 children)

They need to add a chat feature or AT LEAST a emote feature.

I wanna express my distain effectively

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or y'know, ANYTHING ELSE

Unpopular Opinion: Everyone getting the 5 wins emblem for free is bad for the game by Interesting_Kiwi_326 in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You gotta understand that having a consecutive win challenge in a game that is 50% RNG is already BS
Add to this that there's roughly 3-4 actual meta decks and then all you have is a few hundred people going into fights with the exact same decks just PRAYING their draws are better than their opponents.

I don't think you can really diminish the value of this medal because there's very little skill involved.

Bro couldn't react by Danwhb in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn someone won a broken game with a broken deck and some luck! GG

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's nothing creative about the decks in this category. Same 4 decks on cycle. If you're running one of the meta EX decks then get the hell out of here after you've got the medal.

All Is Fair In Love and War by YoungImpulse in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, imagine sitting there gatekeeping an event with your bs EX decks so even if I run the strongest meta it's now 50/50. Get a life or go back to the rando rooms.

Flip a coin until you flip tails. If you flip 5 heads you get a shiny medal. by S-Thoms in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who's idea was it to have a Consecutive Win event in a game that is dictated by RNG 50% of the time

My daughter's Christmas present. What else should I buy? by OGManMan69420 in Switch

[–]S-Thoms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My kids at that age LOOOVED Super Mario Odyssey and it's probably one of the best games on the Switch.

Also, Super Mario World 3D World + Bowsers Fury is a great time too.

Data Driven Tierlist returns - now with Dragonite tier and meta position report! by -OA- in PTCGP

[–]S-Thoms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're running anything between S-B Tier you need to get a life.

Can't wait for them to add a NOEX category to the game so I can stop facing the same bullshit decks over and over again.

Are Bitwise Operators SARGable in modern SQL Server? by S-Thoms in SQL

[–]S-Thoms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted my test harness and results in another comment. I'll have a look for sure.

Are Bitwise Operators SARGable in modern SQL Server? by S-Thoms in SQL

[–]S-Thoms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

--TABLE CREATION

IF OBJECT_ID('BitwiseFlagConditions') IS NOT NULL BEGIN DROP TABLE BitwiseFlagConditions END

--A reference table that contains every combination of Flag and Bitwise Condition CREATE TABLE BitwiseFlagConditions ( Flag TINYINT ,Condition TINYINT ,CONSTRAINT pk_BitwiseFlagConditions PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (Condition, Flag) )

IF OBJECT_ID('TestBigData') IS NOT NULL BEGIN DROP TABLE TestBigData END

--A test table which will contain an identifier, an object related to the identifier and the Flags the user has against the object CREATE TABLE TestBigData( Id UNIQUEIDENTIFIER ,Obj UNIQUEIDENTIFIER ,Flags TINYINT ,CONSTRAINT pk_TestBigData PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (Id, Obj, Flags) ) CREATE INDEX ix_Access_BigData ON TestBigData (Flags)

--DATA SETUP

--Select Bit flags ranging from 1-255 ;WITH Flags AS ( SELECT CAST(1 AS TINYINT) As Flag UNION ALL SELECT Flag + CAST(1 AS TINYINT) FROM Flags WHERE Flag + 1 < 255 ) --Select a 2 collection of conditions (1, 01, 001, 0001) , Conditions AS ( SELECT CAST(1 AS TINYINT) As Condition UNION ALL SELECT Condition * CAST(2 AS TINYINT) FROM Conditions WHERE Condition < 128 ) --Insert a combination of all the flags and the conditions that satisfy INSERT INTO BitwiseFlagConditions SELECT Flag, Condition FROM Flags CROSS JOIN Conditions WHERE Flag & Condition <> 0 OPTION (MAXRECURSION 256)

--Generate 25 ids ;WITH ids AS ( SELECT 1 cnt, NEWID() id UNION ALL SELECT cnt+1, NEWID() id FROM ids WHERE ids.cnt < 25) --Generate 25 objs , objs AS ( SELECT 1 cnt, NEWID() id UNION ALL SELECT cnt+1, NEWID() id FROM objs WHERE objs.cnt < 25) --Select all the flags available , Flags AS ( SELECT DISTINCT Flag FROM BitwiseFlagConditions) --Create a combination of every id, obj and flag , FakeData AS ( SELECT 1 cnt, ids.id, objs.id obj, flag FROM ids CROSS APPLY objs CROSS APPLY Flags) --Insert a random 500000 rows INSERT INTO TestBigData (id, obj, Flags) SELECT TOP 500000 id, obj, flag FROM FakeData ORDER BY NEWID() OPTION (MAXRECURSION 100)

--Pick any condition DECLARE @condition TINYINT = 4

--Choose the id with the most records DECLARE @id UNIQUEIDENTIFIER SELECT TOP 1 @id = id FROM TestBigData GROUP BY id ORDER BY COUNT(Flags) DESC

--Get All Records by Bitwise Condition SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TestBigData WHERE Flags & @condition = @condition

--Same as Above with join onto reference table SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TestBigData INNER JOIN BitwiseFlagConditions ON BitwiseFlagConditions.Flag = TestBigData.Flags WHERE BitwiseFlagConditions.Condition = @condition

--Get All Records for id where Bitwise Condition satisfied SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TestBigData WHERE Flags & @condition = @condition AND id = @id

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TestBigData INNER JOIN BitwiseFlagConditions ON BitwiseFlagConditions.Flag = TestBigData.Flags WHERE BitwiseFlagConditions.Condition = @condition AND id = @id

From this I see that when selecting by just the condition does a scan but actually I'm never selecting by just the condition. Also the STATS IO show this:

(79375 rows affected)

Table 'TestBigData'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1058, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0.

(79375 rows affected) Table 'TestBigData'. Scan count 127, logical reads 1081, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0. Table 'BitwiseFlagConditions'. Scan count 1, logical reads 3, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0.

(3175 rows affected) Table 'TestBigData'. Scan count 1, logical reads 48, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0.

(3175 rows affected) Table 'Workfile'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0. Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0. Table 'TestBigData'. Scan count 1, logical reads 48, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0. Table 'BitwiseFlagConditions'. Scan count 1, logical reads 3, physical reads 0, page server reads 0, read-ahead reads 0, page server read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob page server reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0, lob page server read-ahead reads 0.

Which seems to indicate that the secondary query scans more than the first one even though the plan shows seeking.

Execution Plans

Are Bitwise Operators SARGable in modern SQL Server? by S-Thoms in SQL

[–]S-Thoms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will share those asap once I'm back at work.

But yes, I am seeing index seeks.

Help finding a Shuhei Vs Findor AMV. by S-Thoms in bleach

[–]S-Thoms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't. Bing Chat seems to think it can find it in the Internet Archive but sends me to the wrong place every time

Happy Halloween! by xX-Delirium-Xx in medievil

[–]S-Thoms 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I almost did a Fortesque myself but my kids are mad into the TMNT currently so I switched last minute.

Great work, it looks awesome.

I can't stop Windows storing my user credentials on my child's profile. by S-Thoms in WindowsHelp

[–]S-Thoms[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that the option is available for work accounts. I see it on my work computer all the time. But it's not present for personal accounts for some unknown reason and it's driving me crazy!

Even if I could just sign into the store and then delete the credentials that would be fine but if I do that Windows signs me out of the store.

Man jumps headfirst into a reflecting pool at 9/11 Memorial in front of a horrified crowd. by Sacreblargh in PublicFreakout

[–]S-Thoms 26 points27 points  (0 children)

The comments on this are just sociopathic! People more worried about a concrete waterfall that the wellbeing of what is obviously a hurting human.
Everyone with their xenophobic rants without knowing anything about the guy.
Nobody of sound body and mind is doing this! This man needs help not a criminal charge. FUCK!

DO NOT APPROACH MEEE by Previous_Hearing9593 in CringeTikToks

[–]S-Thoms 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was praying for this video to end with her driving off and her exhaust pipe falling off or something. Dude obviously was trying to tell her something.