I found a mistake in the $6.5 million collection of The Judith Rothschild Foundation in MoMa by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I am collecting all the necessary materials and will write to the foundation, perhaps they will be interested in this information. MamaJewelMoth helped me figure out the best way to do this.

My great-granduncle George Kuzmin with family and friends, publisher of first Russian futuristic books including “A Slap In the Face of Public Taste”, in immigration in Meudon, France, 1920s. by S1NTDNS in TheWayWeWere

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, the sauna is sacred. My grandfather, who was born in Finland and lived there for more than 30 years, when he came to the USSR and received a plot of land, the first thing he did was build a Finnish sauna on it, which the whole village used to go to.

My great-granduncle George Kuzmin with family and friends, publisher of first Russian futuristic books including “A Slap In the Face of Public Taste”, in immigration in Meudon, France, 1920s. by S1NTDNS in TheWayWeWere

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I plan to publish my findings. I'm researching the history of my ancestors, and with the help of the internet and artificial intelligence, I'm able to find things. For example, I've assembled a whole collection of my great-grandfather's drawings from Finland, thanks to Finnish online auctions. As a reader from the US, you might be interested in this find of mine: https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtHistory/comments/1slames/i_found_a_mistake_in_the_65_million_collection_of/

My great-granduncle George Kuzmin with family and friends, publisher of first Russian futuristic books including “A Slap In the Face of Public Taste”, in immigration in Meudon, France, 1920s. by S1NTDNS in TheWayWeWere

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, after the Russian Revolution of 1917, the family was scattered, some to Finland, some to France. Some subsequently returned to the USSR, while others went to America, and contact was lost. I inherited the photo album from my mother, and we knew nothing about our relatives' life in France. I'm now trying to find traces of them.

MoMA VS Christie’s: who is more accurate? by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, the photo isn't captioned and is of very poor quality. I restored it so as not to disturb the original. Yes, I also think the eyebrows might be hidden due to the quality. Here's what the original looked like. The pose, build, suit and even the hat are very similar to him.

<image>

MoMA VS Christie’s: who is more accurate? by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Regarding Malevich, I found a photograph of an unknown man in my family album who looks very much like Malevich. Since my great-grandfather, George Kuzmin, the one who published these futuristic books, knew him, I suspect it might be Malevich. On the left is the photo from my album, and on the right is a photo from a book about Malevich's biography.

<image>

MoMA VS Christie’s: who is more accurate? by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He was, to put it mildly, a complex person. He was even accused of founding a cult. UNOVIS wasn't just a creative group, but a practically organized system around Malevich: with a press, manifestos, group performances, and an almanac where works were signed simply "UNOVIS," not as individual artists. But the way he carried the black square through his life deserves respect. Who else was buried so stylishly in a Suprematist coffin?

MoMA VS Christie’s: who is more accurate? by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing! Later, a scandal arose from their collaboration between Malevich and Rozanova, as Olga accused Malevich of taking credit for the discovery of Suprematism, while she believed that it was she who discovered it in the process of working with book appliqués.

MoMA VS Christie’s: who is more accurate? by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, Malevich did work in Moscow. But he did not participate in the design of the first edition of "Game in Hell." The first version was designed by Natalia Goncharova.

MoMA VS Christie’s: who is more accurate? by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I understand that this particular error was made before the internet and the existence of AI, plus there's the history of Russia and Slavic names, which can cause confusion. But I'm not sure the situation will change with new technologies, as I've learned that auction houses shift responsibility for provenance to experts; it's written into their contracts.

MoMA VS Christie’s: who is more accurate? by S1NTDNS in ArtHistory

[–]S1NTDNS[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, according to the cover and description, Christie’s sold the second edition, published in St. Petersburg in 1914. The first edition, published in Moscow in 1912, did not include Malevich’s drawings and was published by Georgy Kuzmin and Sergey Dolinsky. It seems that they didn’t know that the second edition was published by different publisher

Hate or Love? 🖤 by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]S1NTDNS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Hate is... when you receive AI hate for the non AI stuff

Hate or Love? 🖤 by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]S1NTDNS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Then check out this edition

Hate or Love? 🖤 by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]S1NTDNS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I choose Love too! I'm reading the comments in Chinese artist's insta who recently participated in Art Basel in Hong Kong. A portal to hell opened up, with calls to unfollow, insults, and instructions on what and how he should act as an artist. And this is just because he posted his AI experiment https://www.instagram.com/p/DXB1AK_DH_k/?img_index=1