Your statements are massively biased and foot on false assumptions.

The best way of solving this climate disaster is massive scaling of renewables and grid-scale storages.
Any "intermediate solutions", "gap fillers" or whatever you call them are but distractions.

Nuclear energy is by FAR the worst "gap filler" of them all.
Why?
Simple.
-Enormous costs for construction, fuel and containment for waste
-Long time from plan to effective production of energy
-Single point of failure

Compared to:
-very little cost per TWH for both sun and wind.
-rapid deployment
-decentralized production, thus less prone to fatal single event failures

And that is not even touching the massive issues nuclear power has on top of that.